New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Yes

nah. i dont find the conflating of mass death and genocidal acts circa ww2 (and earlier, for that matter) as subjects that comport with the shooting of children by Lanza.

You'd have it be that each and every gun owner/dealer/etc is complicit.. in which case, we're all party to, yourself included.. which we know is not the case.

It's a sad exercise.
 
nah. i dont find the conflating of mass death and genocidal acts circa ww2 (and earlier, for that matter) as subjects that comport with the shooting of children by Lanza.

You'd have it be that each and every gun owner/dealer/etc is complicit.. in which case, we're all party to, yourself included.. which we know is not the case.

It's a sad exercise.

then I repeat:
I do hold longtime propagandists of gun absolutism as responsible for the deaths in Newtown as I do Adam Lanza.
 
in a perfect world we would have an absolute requirement for background checks. and were that the case..my belief is that Lanza still would have committed the atrocity that he did.

and same (god forbid) will occur again..whether in Bucks county or elsewhere.

Casting the majority who are law abiding under the shadow of complicity is weak at best..and a misdirect on it's face.
 
in a perfect world we would have an absolute requirement for background checks. and were that the case..my belief is that Lanza still would have committed the atrocity that he did.

and same (god forbid) will occur again..whether in Bucks county or elsewhere.

Casting the majority who are law abiding under the shadow of complicity is weak at best..and a misdirect on it's face.

majority wants background checks, phil, I am casting those gun nuts fetishists and absolutists as complicit. I was sure you did understood that, but now I see you did not
 
Back
Top