"You will not replace us!" .... ?

[resident_evil]

Or was it, "Jews will not replace us?" Regardless...

Do you remember these douche bags?



Well, it turns out that a UN report dated 17 March 2000 is planning just that (i.e. replace them). You're a white guy and you see a plan, a bad plan at that, being put into effect and of course you're going to get low IQ white people all upset ... ah ha ha

Here you go, the relevant report excerpt and link to the whole thing at the UN website.




Whole report: https://www.un.org/press/en/2000/20000317.dev2234.doc.html
Pertinent section: https://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/ReplMigED/USA.pdf

 

[resident_evil]

You don't find this interesting to comment on?

This is about talking honestly and honestly I don't want the future of America to include a populations of 1.1 billion in order to pay for elderly welfare when clearly automation and AI will be productive enough to not require low skilled immigration.

This is what life with 1.1 billion people thanks to the United Nations looks like on the beach in China.

Is this what you want for your posterity. Do you want your relatives living ass cheek to jowl?

 

[ObamacareForever]

You don't find this interesting to comment on?

This is about talking honestly and honestly I don't want the future of America to include a populations of 1.1 billion in order to pay for elderly welfare when clearly automation and AI will be productive enough to not require low skilled immigration.

This is what life with 1.1 billion people thanks to the United Nations looks like.

Is this what you want for your posterity. Do you want your relatives living ass cheek to jowl?

how else do you propose paying for elderly welfare?

 

[resident_evil]

how else do you propose paying for elderly welfare?

Automation and artificial intelligence will be productive enough.

 

[ObamacareForever]

Automation and artificial intelligence will be productive enough.

Robots aren't taxed.

 

[resident_evil]

Robots aren't taxed.

That's not the way it works. Why do think conventionally. I've heard that before. What automation and artificial intelligence bring to the table isn't so much taxation as it is productivity.

If a loaf of bread is $3 today then hopefully automation and AI by increasing supply would reduce that to a $1. So when you hand out the gubermint check to grandma instead of giving her $3 you give her $1. So grandma is cheaper to maintain. Honestly it isn't taxation that feeds grandma but productivity - someone or something making that loaf of bread.

 

[ObamacareForever]

That's not the way it works. Why do think conventionally. I've heard that before. What automation and artificial intelligence bring to the table isn't so much taxation as it is productivity.

If loaf of bread is $3 then hopefully automation and AI by increasing supply would reduce that to a $1. So when you hand out the gubermint check to grandma instead of giving her $3 you give her $1. So grandma is cheaper to maintain. Honestly it isn't taxation that feeds grandma but productivity - someone or something making that loaf of bread.

In reality inflation is going the other way.

 

[resident_evil]

In reality inflation is going the other way.

What!?!?

 

[ObamacareForever]

What!?!?

In reality bread isn't going from $3 to $1. It going from $1 to $3.

 

[resident_evil]

In reality bread isn't going from $3 to $1. It going from $1 to $3.

Turn in your tiki torch. You need to be replaced white boy. I'm talking about supply and demand. You do realize that if you increase supply and demand stays the same or goes down then price goes down, right?

 

[ObamacareForever]

Turn in your tiki torch. You need to be replaced white boy. I'm talking about supply and demand. You do realize that if you increase supply and demand stays the same or goes down then price goes down, right?

Demand is increasing as well. The world's population is increasing.

 

[resident_evil]

Demand is increasing as well. The world's population is increasing.

Not in advanced societies. Human population in some places is stabilizing to fit the environment as is natural (i.e. Europe, Japan, ...). Even China and Mexico are turning down the breeding rate. Those places that aren't shouldn't be subsidized by the advanced societies unless they commit to environmental population stability.

Also, productivity with automation and AI could increase faster than the population but that would be bad for the environment.

 

[ObamacareForever]

Not in advanced societies. .

1.) The demand for bread comes from outside advanced societies as well.
2.)Countries aren't locked into being 3rd world forever. Countries you consider less advanced today will advance themselves.

 

[resident_evil]

1.) The demand for bread comes from outside advanced societies as well.

And... and!?!?

2.)Countries aren't locked into being 3rd world forever. Countries you consider less advanced today will advance themselves.

Did I mention China, Mexico, ...? Get a grip.

 

[resident_evil]

Well, it seems that the UN plan to re-populate Europe and the U.S. with third world cheap unskilled labor is well on its way.

 

[resident_evil]

@middleview

Did you even read the UN report or did you just decide to remain as you are.

 

[ObamacareForever]

Well, it seems that the UN plan to re-populate Europe and the U.S. with third world cheap unskilled labor is well on its way.

The UN has zero control over European or third world birth rates.

 

[resident_evil]

The UN has zero control over European or third world birth rates.

Have you made a point here? Because I'm not getting it.

 

[Dawg]

how else do you propose paying for elderly welfare?

Julie's thread says Seniors are the future of DNC

and you're always posting death to Seniors=perfect socialist liberal

 

[middleview]

@middleview

Did you even read the UN report or did you just decide to remain as you are.

Did you? I don't think so. This is a study, not a proposal. It is a discussion of the proportion of the population that is retired vs that which is still in the labor force.
You seem to suggest the UN is about to take over immigration policy around the globe.

-- The numbers of immigrants needed to prevent the decline of the total population are considerably larger than those envisioned by the United Nations projections. The only exception is the United States.

-- The numbers of immigrants needed to prevent declines in the working- age population are larger than those needed to prevent declines in total population. In some cases, such as the Republic of Korea, France, the United Kingdom or the United States, they are several times larger. If such flows were to occur, post-1995 immigrants and their descendants would represent a strikingly large share of the total population in 2050 -- between 30 and 39 per cent in the case of Japan, Germany and Italy.

-- Relative to their population size, Italy and Germany would need the largest number of migrants to maintain the size of their working-age populations. Italy would require 6,500 migrants per million inhabitants annually and Germany, 6,000. The United States would require the smallest number -- 1,300 migrants per million inhabitants per year.