D
Deleted member 21794
Guest
I didn't say it was a secret. I said there's no reason to think Ukraine knew.
Adam Schiff Pressured Witness To Change His Story & Accuse Trump
- Thread starter Nutty Cortez
- Start date
EatTheRich
President
The witness was dissembling.
EatTheRich
President
Nope, it was a closed-door hearing by the House Intelligence Committee.
EatTheRich
President
Why would they know publicly available information about whether their desperately needed aid would be coming or not, right?
Nostra
Governor
Bullshit. The witness answered the question directly.
Schifferbrains was upset that direct answer didn't fit his fairy tale, so he tried to force the witness to lie.
D
Deleted member 21794
Guest
Yes a secret, Soviet-style hearing. No need for all that legal wrangling.
D
Deleted member 21794
Guest
Why do you think it was desperately needed?
EatTheRich
President
Because they were defending against a Russian invasion.
Just when did you think they might discover the appropriation was going to be available?
when you are getting shot at you may find the next delivery of US gear to be important.
D
Deleted member 21794
Guest
I don't know.
so was the last republican closed door hearing on immigration ok?
we can add this to the long list of shit you don't know.
D
Deleted member 21794
Guest
Yep. But you do know?
Mick
The Right is always right
Right. Schitt lives in "hypotheticals" and "parodies" and "misquotes" and "make believe scenarios". The rest of us deal with FACTS. We have the transcript. We don't need Schitt's distorted "parody". We have the facts as stated by Volker. We don't need Schitt's make believe "hypotheticals". We are sane. You are mentally diseased.
Any questions?
Mick
The Right is always right
By stating the facts? You are a funny guy.
EatTheRich
President
By refusing to answer the question whether if someone did what the president did, it would be wrong.
Mick
The Right is always right
He was clear that the President did nothing wrong. Discussing fairytale scenarios that Schitt wanted to be true has nothing to do with the facts in this case. Volker's testimony dealt with only what actually HAPPENED not what Schitt wanted to have happened. See what we are dealing with? You're dealing with parodies and hypotheticals. The rest of us are dealing with the actual word for word comments and facts.
EatTheRich
President
If Schiff’s hypothetical didn’t apply to the President’s actual behavior (as it obviously did), Volker would have had no problem acknowledging it would have been wrong if any president had done that. The reason he didn’t want to is that he didn’t want to be on record condemning what the WH has since admitted the president did.
Mick
The Right is always right
What is with you brain dead tools that prevents actual quoting of the facts and transcripts? Volker did AGREE with it but he made it clear the President didn't do it:
[Schiff] asked Volker whether he would agree that “no President of the United States should ever ask a foreign leader to help intervene in a U.S. election.”
“I agree with that,” said Volker.
===========
Is there something that your puny brain can't register here? Is this like a mental disorder in your diseased left wing brains that prevents actually QUOTING someone? I get it. You hate the fact Volker got up under oath and told the truth. You hate that he wouldn't play games with Schitt and kept slapping the little lying pencil neck down. You hate that the qid pro quo about aid claim was a left wing conspiracy that has been thoroughly and utterly debunked. But you are just embarrassing yourself now.
Some of us live in a world of facts. Others live in a world of hypotheticals and parodies. Which one do you live in and which one is reality? Clown.
