ImpossiblePlease translate to English.
ImpossiblePlease translate to English.
Like only twice in historyAn impeachment is an investigation to determine if the subject have committed acts that would call for their removal from office.
Excuse me, SHEE ITE FOR BRAINS.An impeachment is an investigation to determine if the subject have committed acts that would call for their removal from office.
You guy's already investigated the Clinton's 80's with Whitewater and Ken Starr. Your wingers found nothing.Eh, they just arrested a guy for murder of a girl in 1980...……..one never knows what may pop up.
I haven't investigated anyone or the Clinton's would be in jail.You guy's already investigated the Clinton's 80's with Whitewater and Ken Starr. Your wingers found nothing.
No it does not. He disagreed on Trump being exonerated for colluding with Russia. He admits that they only could not establish that Trump & Co were involved in the hacking of the DNC and the trolling operations. Nobody has ever said they were in the GRU headquarters hacking the DNC with the Russians.This sounds like Trump is exonerated to me.
I find that hard to believe since you don't even investigate the articles you post here from those fake news sites you visit.I haven't investigated anyone or the Clinton's would be in jail.
Then why were at least three people convicted?You guy's already investigated the Clinton's 80's with Whitewater and Ken Starr. Your wingers found nothing.
Which Democratic Party member was ever in charge of that investigation.with lies as that you damn sure can't be trusted
Who ? And BTW which one of them was a Clinton.Then why were at least three people convicted?
He said specifically that he did not have the evidence to find collusion. He also said specifically that his investigation was in no way obstructed or hindered. That's a clean sweep.No it does not. He disagreed on Trump being exonerated for colluding with Russia. He admits that they only could not establish that Trump & Co were involved in the hacking of the DNC and the trolling operations. Nobody has ever said they were in the GRU headquarters hacking the DNC with the Russians.
Here you go.Please translate to English.
No he said he did not establish that the Trumpies were knowingly involved in the hacking and the trolling. That is exactly what the report says. You GOPer congressman tried to get Mueller to stretch the definition to include collusion and he refused.He said specifically that he did not have the evidence to find collusion. He also said specifically that his investigation was in no way obstructed or hindered. That's a clean sweep.
Sounds like you have some research to do. Good luck.Who ? And BTW which one of them was a Clinton.
Watch the video, he was specifically asked about collusion and conspiracy. You are trying to hold on to a lie.No he said he did not establish that the Trumpies were knowingly involved in the hacking and the trolling. That is exactly what the report says. You GOPer congressman tried to get Mueller to stretch the definition to include collusion and he refused.
What does that mean?Here you go.
I, The Thinker, have been reduced to peanut picking.
And Mueller clearly disagreed with him. How are you skipping over that part ?Watch the video, he was specifically asked about collusion and conspiracy. You are trying to hold on to a lie.
No, he didn't. After referring back to his report, he then agreedAnd Mueller clearly disagreed with him. How are you skipping over that part ?
Except for the “13 Angry Democrats”A Republican run investigation from top to bottom.
Sorry but you folk just can't be trusted.
Yeah they sat there being angry and unable to do anything for 2 yrs while the GOP went all in on Trump's cover up.Except for the “13 Angry Democrats”