New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

MEAN GIRLS

Renee said:
Exactly! We hold females to higher standards. In my class I pretend that my husband and I go to a party and get drunk , and first i act like him , falling down and cursing, then I walk out acting the exact way. I then ask my group, "who looked worse" and it is always me ...exact behavior.i don't think we should lower the standards for women, but rather raise them for men.
Click to expand...

Your husband gets falling-down drunk at parties? That's a warning sign of a problem...
 
Renee said:
Perhaps where you live......maybe you should get out and see the world outside of your environment, women and girls still hit with words and exclusion..,, look at yourself
Click to expand...

Don't be silly....where I live, nobody fights and, ummm....I've seen more of the world than most people, possibly even you.....

Have you read a newspaper lately? Watched the news? Here ya go....that's YOUR "neighborhood", isn't it?



http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news...ight-Black-Friday-Philadelphia-233855601.html
 
drivebyheckler said:
Lately I have seen a lot of talk about "Mean Girls". Obviously, this needs to be discussed in a generic sense as to comply with forum rules.

But like, oh say "The Affordable Care Act", which has resulted in health care being less affordable overall (of course, it' s windfall for moochers, but that's an entirely different thread and story), I think we have a serious case of mislabeling.

On one side, we have a few vicious people, whose major goal in PJ life is to make sure lots and lots of babies are killed. Even a top cheerleader equates freedom with lots of abortion clinics! In addition to having a lust for dead babies, that side engages in vicious, often false and straw man attacks against others.

On the other side, we have individuals who have respect for life. To these people, it's not about fighting to make sure more babies are killed. It's about individuals living a proper life. But what does proper mean? Sadly, in this day and age of big government, "society owes me!", "pay for my birth control and subsidize my abortion or I'll have this baby and REALLY mooch of you!" mentalities, we have to actually define what that means.

A proper life means you educate yourself, support yourself, manage your own reproductive organs. As a side note, Barack Obama thinks women are inferior and values them less. He thinks men can manage their reproductive organs just fine on their own, but that women are inferior and need government to step in and help. But what would one expect from a president who babbles about equal pay for women out of one side of his mouth, while paying them 13% less out of the other. But I digress...

A proper life means doing all the above, PLUS not having children until you can afford them. Many people have children unexpectedly. Normal, rational people raise those kids or put them up for adoption. And if a "mother" is so hellbent on killing her baby because it's an inconvenient time, FINE! That's an elective medical procedure. And as with any other elective medical procedure, cough up your money and pay for it.

So let's get back to the original point. I submit to you the REAL "Mean Girls" are the ones who think killing a baby for the crime of being conceived at the wrong time is fine. Is there anything meaner than killing a baby who's done nothing wrong? I think the REAL "Mean Girls" are the ones who attack others who simply propose having a little respect for life. I think the REAL "Mean Girls" are the people who think freedom means lots of abortion clinics, with these abortion clinics being subsidized by our tax money. I think the REAL "Mean Girls" are those who think certain women are inferior, can't take responsibility for their lives, and need to be told something like, "there there you little loser. You're dumb. You can't manage your own reproductive organs. Here loser, take this free birth control. Have this abortion at the place we force suckers to subsidize with tax dollars. Oh and loser, here's some food stamps. Just remember to vote Democrat. See those mean people over there? They think you're actually capable of, and expect you to, manage your own reproductive organs and can be a productive member of society. They're MEAN!"

Just who is it that is the "Mean Girls"?
Click to expand...
The word you're looking for is "fetus."
 
Jen said:
Fetus is a word liberals like to use when referring to an unborn baby in order to remove the sense of guilt of killing an innocent unborn human being.
Click to expand...

Fetus is the correct word. It is not a child anymore than an acorn is an oak tree. You use the incorrect word to personify a zygote to instill guilt.
 
Barbella said:
Don't be silly....where I live, nobody fights and, ummm....I've seen more of the world than most people, possibly even you.....

Have you read a newspaper lately? Watched the news? Here ya go....that's YOUR "neighborhood", isn't it?



http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news...ight-Black-Friday-Philadelphia-233855601.html
Click to expand...

Wow...thanks for showing me that girls fist fight ....I had no idea. ((Sarcasm alert) I keep forgetting you can only think literally and not in nuances or generalities. I doubt if you saw more of the world than I have.....and if you did, it was with narrow prejudiced glasses
 
drivebyheckler said:
Odd, I've never heard a woman say "I just felt my fetus kick". I guess you know better than billions of mothers?
Click to expand...

No , you hear people personify it because they fantasize about it being a baby. Why so you suppose medical schools call it a fetus?
 
Jen said:
Fetus is a word liberals like to use when referring to an unborn baby in order to remove the sense of guilt of killing an innocent unborn human being.
Click to expand...
A few years back, I had an ugly mole removed from my back. This was living human tissue, and I killed it. Genetically, it was every bit as much human as my brain. And every single cell in that ugly mole had the potential to grow into a full human being, under the right conditions -- a clone of myself, in fact. Yet, I didn't feel even a little guilt about killing that mole. And I wouldn't have felt one bit more guilt about it if you called that mole a "baby." Your word games make absolutely no difference in the fact that all I did is got rid of an unthinking lump of unwanted cells.

A fetus is the same way. You can call it a baby. It makes no difference what label you attach to it. What matters isn't whether it's living genetically human tissue, nor whether it's POTENTIALLY a future full-fledged human being (something that every cell in your body has going for it). What matters is whether there's something about it that should be regarded as having a right to life -- something that sets it apart from and above all the other living things you don't regard as having an individual right to life. There's a productive discussion to be had about what, exactly, that is, and then we can decide whether a given fetus has that thing or not. But the discussion isn't helped by using the term "baby" to try to conflate the born with the unborn.
 
Renee said:
Wow...thanks for showing me that girls fist fight ....I had no idea. ((Sarcasm alert) I keep forgetting you can only think literally and not in nuances or generalities. I doubt if you saw more of the world than I have.....and if you did, it was with narrow prejudiced glasses
Click to expand...

YOU're the one who said "girls fight with words", and "boys fight with fists". I was merely showing you the error of your thinking. I wouldn't want you to spread false information to your students, after all....

As for "narrow, prejudiced glasses"....if you say so, it must be true, right? Because you know me so well....LOL

In fact, wherever I go, I love, absolutely LOVE, mingling with the natives. I eat where they eat, I shop where they shop, I talk to them, make friends, see how they really live....

That's one of my passions. But I must be wrong. You know me better than I know myself, because you're soooooooooo damn smart.
 
drivebyheckler said:
Odd, I've never heard a woman say "I just felt my fetus kick". I guess you know better than billions of mothers?
Click to expand...
I often call my daughter a "rugrat." I assure you, however, she is not actually a rat, and if we engage in specific policy discussions about proper treatment of rats, it would be useful if we didn't deprive ourselves of language distinguishing between rats and human children.
 
Arkady said:
A few years back, I had an ugly mole removed from my back. This was living human tissue, and I killed it. Genetically, it was every bit as much human as my brain. And every single cell in that ugly mole had the potential to grow into a full human being, under the right conditions -- a clone of myself, in fact. Yet, I didn't feel even a little guilt about killing that mole. And I wouldn't have felt one bit more guilt about it if you called that mole a "baby." Your word games make absolutely no difference in the fact that all I did is got rid of an unthinking lump of unwanted cells.

A fetus is the same way. You can call it a baby. It makes no difference what label you attach to it. What matters isn't whether it's living genetically human tissue, nor whether it's POTENTIALLY a future full-fledged human being (something that every cell in your body has going for it). What matters is whether there's something about it that should be regarded as having a right to life -- something that sets it apart from and above all the other living things you don't regard as having an individual right to life. There's a productive discussion to be had about what, exactly, that is, and then we can decide whether a given fetus has that thing or not. But the discussion isn't helped by using the term "baby" to try to conflate the born with the unborn.
Click to expand...

potato/ potahto............. it's a baby any way you look at it (and I don't mean your ugly back mole).
 
Arkady said:
I often call my daughter a "rugrat." I assure you, however, she is not actually a rat, and if we engage in specific policy discussions about proper treatment of rats, it would be useful if we didn't deprive ourselves of language distinguishing between rats and human children.
Click to expand...

Irrelevant gobbledygook. Try again.
 
Arkady said:
I often call my daughter a "rugrat." I assure you, however, she is not actually a rat, and if we engage in specific policy discussions about proper treatment of rats, it would be useful if we didn't deprive ourselves of language distinguishing between rats and human children.
Click to expand...

Yeah, but do you ever call her a "living fetus"? Because that's what she IS, right?
 
Arkady said:
A few years back, I had an ugly mole removed from my back. This was living human tissue, and I killed it. Genetically, it was every bit as much human as my brain. And every single cell in that ugly mole had the potential to grow into a full human being, under the right conditions -- a clone of myself, in fact. Yet, I didn't feel even a little guilt about killing that mole. And I wouldn't have felt one bit more guilt about it if you called that mole a "baby." Your word games make absolutely no difference in the fact that all I did is got rid of an unthinking lump of unwanted cells.

A fetus is the same way. You can call it a baby. It makes no difference what label you attach to it. What matters isn't whether it's living genetically human tissue, nor whether it's POTENTIALLY a future full-fledged human being (something that every cell in your body has going for it). What matters is whether there's something about it that should be regarded as having a right to life -- something that sets it apart from and above all the other living things you don't regard as having an individual right to life. There's a productive discussion to be had about what, exactly, that is, and then we can decide whether a given fetus has that thing or not. But the discussion isn't helped by using the term "baby" to try to conflate the born with the unborn.
Click to expand...

Let me know when you remove a mole that has its own beating heart. Until then, you pecked out paragraphs of irrelevant nonsense.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top