Schrodinger's Platypus
Radical Constitutional Extremist
So? Stop spit balling and say something real.Yeah, it’s not like Project Veritas would misrepresent the record when self-seemingly describing it, right?
So? Stop spit balling and say something real.Yeah, it’s not like Project Veritas would misrepresent the record when self-seemingly describing it, right?
Juan Carlos Vera, who worked for the now-defunct Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (Acorn), filed a federal lawsuit two years ago accusing O'Keefe of portraying him in a false light and filming him without his knowledge.You wrote that the settlement was for defamation. Ordinarily I’d say you were mistaken. But given your record of lying I’m going to conclude you’re lying now.
The settlement was for invasion of privacy, liar. O’Keefe was “guilty” of filming somebody without their knowledge—in other words, he was guilty of investigative journalism because that’s exactly what he was doing.
Filming him without his knowledge sounds like invasion of privacy. How ‘bout making your next post all about the truth? Can’t be worse than lying your ass off for scores and dozens of posts in just the past week.Juan Carlos Vera, who worked for the now-defunct Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (Acorn), filed a federal lawsuit two years ago accusing O'Keefe of portraying him in a false light and filming him without his knowledge.
James O'Keefe agrees to pay $100,000 settlement to fired Acorn employee
Activism against Acorn in hidden camera video led to a national controversy and ultimately the organisation's demisewww.theguardian.com
Portraying him in a false light sounds like defamation to me....I can't find court docs.
How about staying on the subject...Veritas. O'Keefe is a scumbag who was busted in the Acorn sting by making seem like Vera was going to help smuggle women into the country to be prostitutes when the fact is that Vera collected enough info from O'Keefe and contacted law enforcement after the meeting...If O'Keefe hadn't made a deal for immunity to turn over the tapes he'd have gone to jail for conspiracy and human trafficking because by his little sting he exposed what was a plan to smuggle women.Filming him without his knowledge sounds like invasion of privacy. How ‘bout making your next post all about the truth? Can’t be worse than lying your ass off for scores and dozens of posts in just the past week.
Said the angry boy dropping little angry emojis here and there like Johnny Appleseed dropping his apple seeds. You're angry. Good. That gives me hope!What a sad little boy you are. CNN is far more truthful that any fux news.
So their self-serving description of events is no more a guide to reality than the videos they produce to baffle the willfully gullible.So? Stop spit balling and say something real.
Prove it.So their self-serving description of events is no more a guide to reality than the videos they produce to baffle the willfully gullible.
Prove it.
What a very odd person you are....still defending or attempting to deflect from scum like Veritas...Said the angry boy dropping little angry emojis here and there like Johnny Appleseed dropping his apple seeds. You're angry. Good. That gives me hope!
Not half as odd as someone still defending CNN.What a very odd person you are....still defending or attemting to ddflect from scum like Veritas...
Where did I offer a defense of CNN? I simply stated fact. Veritas conjured up a sting in which an equipment operator offered his opinions....and right wingers like you latched on as if he had set policy or controlled content.Not half as odd as someone still defending CNN.
Where did I ever state or assume he set policy?Where did I offer a defense of CNN? I simply stated fact. Veritas conjured up a sting in which an equipment operator offered his opinions....and right wingers like you latched on as if he had set policy or controlled content.
Then you do have a problem with CNN! Tell us all about it!Where did I offer a defense of CNN? I simply stated fact. Veritas conjured up a sting in which an equipment operator offered his opinions....and right wingers like you latched on as if he had set policy or controlled content.
So again...if he is just an equipment operator, he had no influence over stories or content and the Veritas sting is meaningless....Where did I ever state or assume he set policy?
Clearly I have a problem with Veritas and people like you who cling to their smears and stings as if they actually are useful...Then you do have a problem with CNN! Tell us all about it!
No no no no no no no. CNN! You have a problem with CNN! Let’s hear about it.Clearly I have a problem with Veritas and people like you who cling to their smears and stings as if they actually are useful...
Send O'Keefe your money so he can keep it up.
It’s not meaningless. Can’t you leave your assumptions at the door and connect the dots?So again...if he is just an equipment operator, he had no influence over stories or content and the Veritas sting is meaningless....
Good to know.
Speaking of leaving your assumptions at the door...It’s not meaningless. Can’t you leave your assumptions at the door and connect the dots?
Does he or does he not accept marching orders from people who do set policy and control content?
You lie to other people so I’m not surprised you lie to yourself. We’ve wrung out everything we’re going to wring out here. I’m comfortable calling out your lies. You’re comfortable in your lies.Speaking of leaving your assumptions at the door...
You imply something not shown to be true from the Veritas Sting.
1. I proved, more than once, that Charles is an equipment operator and not someone who sets policy at CNN. It is extremely unlikely that he even sits in on meeting between reporters, producers and upper management to discuss content.You lie to other people so I’m not surprised you lie to yourself. We’ve wrung out everything we’re going to wring out here. I’m comfortable calling out your lies. You’re comfortable in your lies.
I think we’re done here.