New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Another thread closed?

Boca said:
I'm sorry Cotton, I was so ticked at a PJ moderator's veiled implication I was racist for simple quoting a Supreme Court decision that I forgot to thank you
Click to expand...

Thank you Boca, but negative remarks about, who cares what i think was toward one of the mods!

That was NOT racist... don't care what they say!

Have a good one!
 
Cotton2226 said:
Thank you Boca, but negative remarks about, who cares what i think was toward one of the mods!

That was NOT racist... don't care what they say!

Have a good one!
Click to expand...

BOCA,what I like about is when you disagree you post why. I have no problem being corrected, I do have a problem with rudeness. I was told wrong. And made the mistake of accepting the persons words.

Thank you,too.
 
What that case established is that Minor could not vote, but she could be president of the United States.

Another case that followed Minor vs Happersett:

http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/169/649/case.html

1898, this case came into direct conflict with the Chinese Exclusion Act, but this individual born in San Francisco was ruled as a citizen, as he did nothing to conflict with the laws of the United States at the time, and while his parents were Chinese born, and even though he himself, visited China, he returned to work and abide by the laws of this Country.

But the ruling, created some havoc as it was exempt from the Chinese exclusion act.

So in conclusion, I would argue that the court, upheld the Constitution, even in the face of great adversity for the time.

Today, the court has NO CHOICE but uphold the constitution, as it becomes apparent thru venue and argument, that the only arguments written by the strict constitutionalists, would have to upheld; this isn't polemics, it's law.

Regards
Pace
 
BitterPill said:
Your avatar is fine. It's not like your glass is half-full.
Click to expand...

As I recall that was my tenth or eleventh mug, freshly drawn, served by the red-headed barmaid who took the picture. The last time I was in Texas I stopped in the place; she wasn't there anymore but the picture was still on the wall in the men's room.
 
Boca said:
Ohh that....well it was an old pic of me when I was in my prime. But I wouldn't mind raisin' one again with Cotton or you. Do you play?
Click to expand...

No,but I know Cotton lives for it.

I am reminded of the old man sitting at the bar saying,"This is my first one today" I once knew a person who began to use that. It irked me until I said,"You used to make fun of what that man said and now you are using it."

I am happy to see those who enjoy. I have not much tolerance for drunks. I had to work with too many children, but do not think I am so intolerant at Social Drinking. My family comes in with their favorite wine, or a new one. They all have a glass and discuss which one is best. I would not know one from the other.I only remember that old song about."Do They Have Mogen David In Heaven?" As I remember that was a sickening sweet.
 
Boca said:
As I recall that was my tenth or eleventh mug, freshly drawn, served by the red-headed barmaid who took the picture. The last time I was in Texas I stopped in the place; she wasn't there anymore but the picture was still on the wall in the men's room.
Click to expand...

I cannot help but wonder what you look like now!:eek:)
 
PACE said:
What that case established is that Minor could not vote, but she could be president of the United States.
Click to expand...

Yeah...ironic isn't it. Can't vote but she could have been prez because they ruled she was a natural-born citizen. Is that what they said about W. K. Ark? Do you think that's what they'll say about Obama when this case get's there?
 
If you read the purpose of this law or rule, it was to keep aristocrats from coming over to this country and using their great wealth to buy a position as President and that they might try to make it into a royalty.

I think the USSC would have a hard time ruling anyone who is born in the USA to an us citizen as not being a full us rights bearing person.

But who know's, they were the RULER who made GWB the second worst president in 2000. He was the first worst president in 2004
 
The Orly Taitz/Jerome Corsi law suits have argued that Obama had dual citizenship and that made him ineligible for natual born status....the same thing would apply to Romney.
 
I don't know about you, but I am sick to death of this Jerome Corsi guy, he's a gadfly who does nothing to help the national landscape, it must be wonderful to know you are so righteous and sancrosant in your own conscience, you can spend your days tearing at the side of others, as your fate is well established and locked.

And this Orly Taitz? the more I read about her, the more I believe this woman is mentally deranged.

Regards
Pace
 
"it must be wonderful to know you are so righteous and sancrosant in your own conscience, you can spend your days tearing at the side of others, as your fate is well established and locked."



Now that is a very ironic statement!!!!!!!
 
What your view on Jerome Corsi's continued meddling in national affairs? why would anyone take him seriously?

Regards
Pace
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top