New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Awww.....King Barry's "taster" didn't show.....

Lapcat said:
so he had to just gaze longingly at the feast, instead of chowing down as he (and Mooshelle) usually does whenever food is served. Thus proving that the life of royalty isn't always all it's cracked up to be.

BWAhahahahaha!!!!!!

I ......LOVE......IT.....!

Hey Barry....

just cause you're paranoid.....

doesn't mean they're not out to get ya!

http://dailycaller.com/2013/03/14/obama-couldnt-eat-at-hill-meeting-without-taster-audio/
Click to expand...

Is having a "taster" something that started with Obama? Is it something Obama has control over? Just curious because you apparently are all over whether this is normal or something unusual that just started in the last 5 years. What's the scoop Lappy?
 
Lapcat said:
so he had to just gaze longingly at the feast, instead of chowing down as he (and Mooshelle) usually does whenever food is served. Thus proving that the life of royalty isn't always all it's cracked up to be.

BWAhahahahaha!!!!!!

I ......LOVE......IT.....!Hey Barry....

just cause you're paranoid.....

doesn't mean they're not out to get ya!

http://dailycaller.com/2013/03/14/obama-couldnt-eat-at-hill-meeting-without-taster-audio/
Click to expand...





"What seems clear is that when the president eats somewhere other than 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., tasters — in the form of Secret Service agents or military personnel — are likely to be involved. According to a Washington Post article from July 1990, George H.W. Bush ate out at Washington restaurants a lot by presidential standards, about once a month, and when he did he brought along his own condiments, bottled water, and a taster. On at least one occasion the taster was seen to personally wash all of George and Barbara's tableware before use and subsequently monitor its whereabouts, sample the food, supervise its service, and uncork and taste the first couple's wine."

From July 2008, 4 months before the 2008 presidential election about a president 18 years earlier.

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2772/does-the-president-have-an-official-food-taster

Was HW (or GW) "paranoid"?? Do you "love it" still?

No wonder you guys keep losing.
 
KnotaFrayed said:
"What seems clear is that when the president eats somewhere other than 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., tasters — in the form of Secret Service agents or military personnel — are likely to be involved. According to a Washington Post article from July 1990, George H.W. Bush ate out at Washington restaurants a lot by presidential standards, about once a month, and when he did he brought along his own condiments, bottled water, and a taster. On at least one occasion the taster was seen to personally wash all of George and Barbara's tableware before use and subsequently monitor its whereabouts, sample the food, supervise its service, and uncork and taste the first couple's wine."

From July 2008, 4 months before the 2008 presidential election.
http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2772/does-the-president-have-an-official-food-taster

Was GW "paranoid"?? Do you "love it" still?

No wonder you guys keep losing.
Click to expand...

Thanks Knot. They're sad, really, in their rutting heat to make Obama look bad.
 
BobbyT said:
Thanks Knot. They're sad, really, in their rutting heat to make Obama look bad.
Click to expand...

Hi BobbyT,

Mr. Obama, like all of us has his faults, but as you have pointed out, the obsession is not about that and the obsession about Mr. Obama exposes an apparent lack of ability of those working hard to make him look bad, to think before "speaking".
 
KnotaFrayed said:
Hi BobbyT,

Mr. Obama, like all of us has his faults, but as you have pointed out, the obsession is not about that and the obsession about Mr. Obama exposes an apparent lack of ability of those working hard to make him look bad, to think before "speaking".
Click to expand...

anybody, who uses Dailycaller especially after the fake prostitute story and many others or breitbart after numerous fake stories ,or FOX, notorious communist party propaganda emulator, does not deserve to be regarded better than infectious parasitic bacteria
 
Lies and made up ridicule is all they have left,Knot! Should we pity them? It must be sad to have only hate to feed their weary souls!
 
What is very telling is the fact that even this silly, trivial post that you made in jest required Obama sycophants to descend upon it offering apologetics that would cause any seminarian to blush.

There is little doubt of the Obamacult. They can let NOTHING pass - not even silly stuff. He must be kept spotless, and they must sprint to any strand - no matter how tongue-in-cheek it may be. The constant, fierce, and unrelenting apologetics for a bloody politician tells the tale. That's how important (and revered) he is.
 
RickWA said:
What is very telling is the fact that even this silly, trivial post that you made in jest required Obama sycophants to descend upon it offering apologetics that would cause any seminarian to blush.

There is little doubt of the Obamacult. They can let NOTHING pass - not even silly stuff. He must be kept spotless, and they must sprint to any strand - no matter how tongue-in-cheek it may be. The constant, fierce, and unrelenting apologetics for a bloody politician tells the tale. That's how important (and revered) he is.
Click to expand...

Hi, Rick, i don;t want to use the word "telling", but my eyes opened wide in bewilderment, when I saw you defending "silly" post by a notorious *** edited ***
 
I defended nothing. I criticized those MANY lefties who are altogether far too uncritical of Obama to the point of apologetics for even a silly joke sort of post. I know it to be unhealthy for citizens to suspend critique and hold leaders in too high esteem.

As far as referring to lapcat as bacteria (or whatever) - that's dehumanizing and wrong. I'll have no part of that. No person should be referenced as such whether righty or lefty.
 
Damn Rick, did you just roll off the turnip truck?

You know damn well that's how the game is played around here by diehard partisans: defend your guys and attack the other guys. Labeling one side a cult and turning a blind eye toward the other is just plain silly.
 
RickWA said:
I defended nothing. I criticized those MANY lefties who are altogether far too uncritical of Obama to the point of apologetics for even a silly joke sort of post. I know it to be unhealthy for citizens to suspend critique and hold leaders in too high esteem.

As far as referring to lapcat as bacteria (or whatever) - that's dehumanizing and wrong. I'll have no part of that. No person should be referenced as such whether righty or lefty.
Click to expand...


***edited***
 
RickWA said:
Lapcat is a lady, a person - and she demonstrates no more vitriol than, say, a certain poster on the left here who's name starts with an "S" who posts the "F" word in every post, constantly talks about a bullet to the head for those against gun control, etc. Funny how that person escapes "bacterial" status.

I deal with such things - and folks who post angrily - by dehumanizing none. These are people.

And... "no" Obama aplogists? Sorry, dude. Demonstrably false. He is selected as avatar. His speech transcripts are posted religiously as are links to his addresses. Folks descend even on joke strands to defend him on all matters. These are facts. :)
Click to expand...

Besides...look at all the times that Rick has defended liberal women posters from attack from people on the Right.....uh......wait a minute......give me a second to look.....uhmmmm......I know there was ONE somewhere.....hmmmm.......uh.......I'll get back to you.
 
Read the exchange above that asserts that there are ZERO Obama apologists on this board. Not even one. Now apply reason (and your eyes).

Any thoughts on that?
 
Actually, you can ask Marylb, or Liblady (if only she were still around).

YOU, on the other hand...well - a walking violation of the rules here pretty much. Not posting to content, posting about posters rather than subjects - basically you personify what Connie said we rank and file posters cannot do.

I've never reported anyone and never will. I've never had a violation, infraction, or warning - but that can readily change as I observe truth relative to board member conduct (irrespective of title). :)

BTW: As moderator, what is your stand on the direct namecalling above (besides justifying and diluting it here)??? Any official stance on that?
 
No,no, Rick....remember that time there was a Left-of-Center female poster being attacked by a bunch of Rightys and you leaped to her defense and said.............oh, gosh....what was it....ummmm.......gee............I can't recall......


but I KNOW you leaped to her defense and chastized them because you are fair and impartial and non-partisan and above-it-all unlike us lowly sinners.
 
I already answered your insult-justifying untruth above, GG. Try threaded view, BTW. You may get better placement of your spam. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top