no Dodge.
The way his position was characterized was dishonest.
I just pointed that out.
Beto O'Rourke
- Thread starter Sunset Rose
- Start date
The way his position was characterized was dishonest.
I just pointed that out.
marvin martian
Emperor
What does that have to do with your support for Beto's plan to have police kick in doors and deprive citizens of their civil rights at gunpoint?
Everything.
You are lying about his position again.
If you want to talk about his position you need to start by being honest about what his position is.
Of course no one supports having "....police kick in doors and deprive citizens of their civil rights at gunpoint?"
Since that is not Beto's plan there is nothing to talk about.
What you did is called "a straw man fallacy".
If you want to talk about his plan the starting point needs to be his actual plan.....not lies about it.
marvin martian
Emperor
You're the one who's lying, and it's irrelevant anyway because your little Nazi dropped out of the race. He's a has-been loser and he can go whack off to Schindler's List all he wants now.
Nope.
His plan is not to have "....police kick in doors and deprive citizens of their civil rights at gunpoint?"
That is an outright lie.
Facts matter.
marvin martian
Emperor
That was exactly his plan, but like I said it's irrelevant because he's gone now. Even your fellow Democrats were disgusted by the level of tyranny Beto was advocating.
freyasman
Senator
freyasman
Senator
No, it wasn't.
freyasman
Senator
You're lying.
You're lying about his plan.
You're lying about whether anyone supports it.
You're lying when you say it was mis-characterized.
You have been doing nothing but lying for the last couple days around here. And we can all see it.
freyasman
Senator
Not to you, apparently.
No. That was not his plan.
You are mis characterizing it.
Classic Straw Man fallacy.
marvin martian
Emperor
Why don't you explain his plan?
Yes, it was.
Utter nonsense.
He did not say he was going to rob anyone nor did he say he wanted to have "...police kick in doors and deprive citizens of their civil rights at gunpoint"
Those are lies.
If you want to discuss his actual position you need to be honest about what his position actually is.
Perhaps try quoting it.
marvin martian
Emperor
Yeah, his confiscation plan is right there in point #5. Why would you lie about it, then document your lie? Do you just not understand what a "mandatory buyback" is?
BTW, you can't "buy back" something you didn't sell. That's called fraud.
His plan is a buy back plan.
Not "....police kick in doors and deprive citizens of their civil rights at gunpoint"
Nor robbery.
If you want to talk about his actual plan we can do that but you have to be honest about what it is
marvin martian
Emperor
"Mandatory buy back". Do you understand what that means? What happens if I choose not to participate in his "mandatory buy back"?
freyasman
Senator
Do you work in government?
Because this desperate defense of their bad actions is making me think you do..... you're fighting like a guy trying to save his meal ticket.
Then you own an illegal weapon and will be charged with a crime if you are caught with it.
That is not robbery nor is it "......police kick in doors and deprive citizens of their civil rights at gunpoint"
