Bots running your lives

[voyager]

Good for you - The same holds true for me.

Ergo, no bot problem.

It's always so simple for the cult.

 

[Days]

Na, the troll bots are vandalism. You don't have the right to vandalize Private property.

I know it is tough to keep track of conversations without thread view. But we were talking about the censorship of human tweets.

 

[ObamacareForever]

I know it is tough to keep track of conversations without thread view. But we were talking about the censorship of human tweets.

No, we are talking about bots. Bot's don't have constitutional rights. and secondly we are talking about vandalism. Nobody has the right to vandalize Twitter's platform with misinformation and bullshit.

I can't go spray paint "Trump's a russian manchurian Candidate" on your house and then proceed to claim I am acting as a agent of the free press. Same thing with Trolls on Twitter.

 

[Zam-Zam]

It's always so simple for the cult.

Is it more difficult for you?

 

[Zam-Zam]

No, we are talking about bots. Bot's don't have constitutional rights. and secondly we are talking about vandalism. Nobody has the right to vandalize Twitter's platform with misinformation and bullshit.

I can't go spray paint "Trump's a russian manchurian Candidate" on your house and then proceed to claim I am acting as a agent of the free press. Same thing with Trolls on Twitter.

Not exactly the same thing.

One is vandalism, a prosecutable offense. One is clearly not vandalism.

No one is compelled to go onto social media, and those who choose to are free to use their own discernment and judgement.

If anyone feels they are controlled by bots, it would be interesting to hear from them.

 

[ObamacareForever]

Not exactly the same thing.

One is vandalism, a prosecutable offense. One is clearly not vandalism.

Tweeting out misinformation is defiling Twitter's private property

 

[Zam-Zam]

Tweeting out misinformation is defiling Twitter's private property

As someone once said, "Words mean things"

Vandalism:

willful or malicious destruction or defacement of public or private property

Definition of VANDALISM

willful or malicious destruction or defacement of public or private property… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

If you can find a legitimate, generally accepted definition of vandalism from a respected source that says anything about "tweeting out disinformation", I'll be glad to review it.

Again, can anyone find an actual human being that believes their lives are being run by bots?

Anyone?

 

[ObamacareForever]

As someone once said, "Words mean things"

Vandalism:

willful or malicious destruction or defacement of public or private property

Definition of VANDALISM

willful or malicious destruction or defacement of public or private property… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

If you can find a legitimate, generally accepted definition of vandalism from a respected source that says anything about "tweeting out disinformation", I'll be glad to review it.

Again, can anyone find an actual human being that believes their lives are being run by bots?

Anyone?

Tweeting out misinformation is defacing Twitter's private property.

 

[Zam-Zam]

Tweeting out misinformation is defacing Twitter's private property.

So, a hard no on producing a valid definition that meets your criteria.

It's all good.

 

[ObamacareForever]

So, a hard no on producing a valid definition that meets your criteria.

It's all good.

They delete the misinformation because they consider it vandalism.

 

[Zam-Zam]

They delete the misinformation because they consider it vandalism.

So you say.

And fail to back up.

 

[ObamacareForever]

So you say.

And fail to back up.

You want me to back up that twitter is private property? or that they delete misinformation?

 

[Days]

No, we are talking about bots. Bot's don't have constitutional rights. and secondly we are talking about vandalism. Nobody has the right to vandalize Twitter's platform with misinformation and bullshit.

I can't go spray paint "Trump's a russian manchurian Candidate" on your house and then proceed to claim I am acting as a agent of the free press. Same thing with Trolls on Twitter.

okay, you were talking about that with other posters, but I was talking about the censorship of the human voices. forget it. This is why we need a thread view, but it isn't available. I really think the thread view software was phased out in order to make these forum conversations all confused, it was another attack on our freedom of speech.

carry on

 

[Zam-Zam]

You want me to back up that twitter is private property? or that they delete misinformation?

Back up that "they consider it vandalism". Since it is impossible for you to read their collective minds, you would have to show some evidence that they actually filed charges against someone for, specifically, vandalism, after that someone had "tweeted disinformation".

Good luck.

 

[ObamacareForever]

Back up that "they consider it vandalism". Since it is impossible for you to read their collective minds, you would have to show some evidence that they actually filed charges against someone for, specifically, vandalism, after that someone had "tweeted disinformation".

Good luck.

They don't need the police when they can self-police. If someone vandalized your fence you could go paint over it and not involve the police. Doesn't make it any less vandalism.

 

[ObamacareForever]

okay, you were talking about that with other posters, but I was talking about the censorship of the human voices.

The human voices that you are talking about are vandals.

 

[Zam-Zam]

They don't need the police when they can self-police. If someone vandalized your fence you could go paint over it and not involve the police. Doesn't make it any less vandalism.

Has someone vandalized a fence owned by "Twitter"?

 

[ObamacareForever]

Has someone vandalized a fence owned by "Twitter"?

their platform is analogous to your fence.

 

[Zam-Zam]

their platform is analogous to your fence.

It's not my fence: You were the one who brought the fence into play:


If someone vandalized your fence you could go paint over it and not involve the police.


Anyway, still nothing that indicates vandalism, other than you saying it.

Is it your intent to simply continue repeating that which you offer no evidence to support?

 

[ObamacareForever]

It's not my fence: You were the one who brought the fence into play:


If someone vandalized your fence you could go paint over it and not involve the police.


Anyway, still nothing that indicates vandalism, other than you saying it.

Is it your intent to simply continue repeating that which you offer no evidence to support?

Here is my support:
Misinformation is defiling their private property.