New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Bots running your lives

Days

Commentator
Bots = chaos

there are far more bots than humans on this planet.

but I also found this interesting...

“We’re prioritizing the removal of COVID-19 content when it has a call to action that could potentially cause harm,” according to a statement from Twitter. “As we’ve said previously, we will not take enforcement action on every Tweet that contains incomplete or disputed information about COVID-19.”


Twitter introduced these new policies on March 18, and the company said it has removed more than 2,600 tweets. The company said its automated tools have also challenged more than 4.3 million accounts that were targeting discussions around coronavirus with “spammy or manipulative behaviors.”


“We permanently suspend millions of accounts every month that are automated or spammy, and we do this before they ever reach an eyeball in a Twitter Timeline or Search,” wrote Nick Pickles and Yoel Roth, the company’s director of global public policy strategy and development and head of site integrity, respectively, in a blog post this week.


... so what does that mean? As I read it, they removed 2600 tweets that were from humans. So, it is censorship.
 
there are far more bots than humans on this planet.

but I also found this interesting...

“We’re prioritizing the removal of COVID-19 content when it has a call to action that could potentially cause harm,” according to a statement from Twitter. “As we’ve said previously, we will not take enforcement action on every Tweet that contains incomplete or disputed information about COVID-19.”


Twitter introduced these new policies on March 18, and the company said it has removed more than 2,600 tweets. The company said its automated tools have also challenged more than 4.3 million accounts that were targeting discussions around coronavirus with “spammy or manipulative behaviors.”


“We permanently suspend millions of accounts every month that are automated or spammy, and we do this before they ever reach an eyeball in a Twitter Timeline or Search,” wrote Nick Pickles and Yoel Roth, the company’s director of global public policy strategy and development and head of site integrity, respectively, in a blog post this week.


... so what does that mean? As I read it, they removed 2600 tweets that were from humans. So, it is censorship.
It's not censorship when you agree to their ToS.
 

RickWA

Senator
50%... I'm sure that's an unbiased, scientific number.

I wonder how they came up with it.

And, how many bots are encouraging shutdown?

zero?
Naturally, no lefty will seize on the salient point here - that “bots” will be uniquely found distributing/proliferating “pro-opening” sentiments. This is as it always is. Categorize undesired messaging not for discussion or debate...but dismissal out of hand. Preempt.
 

Days

Commentator
Naturally, no lefty will seize on the salient point here - that “bots” will be uniquely found distributing/proliferating “pro-opening” sentiments. This is as it always is. Categorize undesired messaging not for discussion or debate...but dismissal out of hand. Preempt.
IOW, the government has their bots and the press has their bots, and the press is running software to eliminate the government bots from posting on their sites.

knew that

but now, they touting their censorship of the political right as part of the effort... which it is not, because the censorship of human voices is a totally different matter.
 
Naturally, no lefty will seize on the salient point here - that “bots” will be uniquely found distributing/proliferating “pro-opening” sentiments. This is as it always is. Categorize undesired messaging not for discussion or debate...but dismissal out of hand. Preempt.
Why are pro-premature reopening crowd so reliant on troll bots?
 

Days

Commentator
Private corporations can't censor anybody. They can kick you out of their house, but that isn't censorship now is it?
I have no idea what you just posted. Try finishing your thoughts.

Political partisanship of the free press is a serious threat to democracy and our freedoms. Censorship of opposing political views by the press is a symptom of the political state slipping into fascism. The press is supposed to be unbiased for a reason, our forefathers relied on the press to keep the government honest. Today, we see the press colluding with one party or the other... that's not good. One of the things that comes from that is censorship of opposing views... which equals the snuffing out of our freedom of speech. That article confessed that the press was publishing the citizens comments that agreed with their political view and censoring the comments they didn't agree with... that is a giant red flag for democracy.
 

Mick

The Right is always right
Bots = chaos

And these 500 doctors were all magic "bots" too?


ROFL
 
I have no idea what you just posted. Try finishing your thoughts.

Political partisanship of the free press is a serious threat to democracy and our freedoms. Censorship of opposing political views by the press is a symptom of the political state slipping into fascism. The press is supposed to be unbiased for a reason, our forefathers relied on the press to keep the government honest. Today, we see the press colluding with one party or the other... that's not good. One of the things that comes from that is censorship of opposing views... which equals the snuffing out of our freedom of speech. That article confessed that the press was publishing the citizens comments that agreed with their political view and censoring the comments they didn't agree with... that is a giant red flag for democracy.
You have no constitutional right to use social media.
 

JuliefromOhio

Senator
Supporting Member
Russian bots spewed propaganda for Trump in 2016.
It worked.
These anti-safety measure bots/messages are to help Trump in 2020.
Won't work.
Only the unmasked Trumpies are stupid enough to fall for it. Plus Trump is losing voters by the day.
 
Top