New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Catastrophe, and double entendre...

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
Catastrophe. A momentous tragic event ranging from extreme misfortune to utter ruin.

Hurricane Sandy was a catastrophe. Lives, homes, infrastructure, supply, business...disrupted or destroyed on a massive scale. Response to same cannot be achieved in moments..days..even weeks.

Tomorrow, depending on which candidate is to your liking, the outcome may not be . To wit...we're f*cked.
 
It will take a very long time to replace what was lost. But the priority should be making those people left without anything safe, warm, and fed.....That should have been taken care of during the first 24 hours. My understanding is that there are still people out there who are neither safe, warm nor fed and in this length of time after the event, that is unconscionable.

We have given that job to the federal government. That a government agency (FEMA) has failed to come through not once but twice is not acceptable. We need a change.
 
Remember last week when Romney was loading water for the victims and the libs laughed... little did the libs know that water was the most important aid needed. But, Romney knew what the priorities should be.

Obama has done nothing... people are looking for food in dumpsters, gas is nowhere, looters are abound, generators are sitting idle, water is scarce, it's 2012 and Obama is campaigning and people are freezing tonight. It's an Obama tragedy that could have been avoided.
 
Phil,

I know that it's in your nature to be somewhat cryptic, but I'll admit that I don't really get your point here. Hope all is well with you and yours.
 
Catastrophe. A momentous tragic event ranging from extreme misfortune to utter ruin.

Hurricane Sandy was a catastrophe. Lives, homes, infrastructure, supply, business...disrupted or destroyed on a massive scale. Response to same cannot be achieved in moments..days..even weeks.

Tomorrow, depending on which candidate is to your liking, the outcome may not be . To wit...we're f*cked.

Phil...even as they might not admit it today, I imagine many that're now playing for the ultimate loser, will be glad to take a load off, on Wednesday.
 
help is on the way. by no means can this all be solved in one fell swoop. you know that. I know that.
 
wasnt as much point as it was amusement.

it'll come to you. i have every confidence.


all well here. i hope it is the same with yours.
 
it's all a gotcha game. i understand.


how was, let's say..the water... to be gotten to the residents were the sand was 10 feet deep across all the roadways.. or where access was prohibited..
 
nah. wednesday will be when (at least one side)...peaks in a cacophany of gotchas...


thursday... that'll be break time.
 
wasnt as much point as it was amusement.

it'll come to you. i have every confidence.


all well here. i hope it is the same with yours.


We're okay. My youngest was affected by the storm, but it was more blizzard than hurricane where she was. I guess I just didn't quite get the double entendre?
 
It will take a very long time to replace what was lost. But the priority should be making those people left without anything safe, warm, and fed.....That should have been taken care of during the first 24 hours. My understanding is that there are still people out there who are neither safe, warm nor fed and in this length of time after the event, that is unconscionable.

We have given that job to the federal government. That a government agency (FEMA) has failed to come through not once but twice is not acceptable. We need a change.

never saw you complain the first time round
 
Catastrophe. A momentous tragic event ranging from extreme misfortune to utter ruin.

Hurricane Sandy was a catastrophe. Lives, homes, infrastructure, supply, business...disrupted or destroyed on a massive scale. Response to same cannot be achieved in moments..days..even weeks.

Tomorrow, depending on which candidate is to your liking, the outcome may not be . To wit...we're f*cked.

Thank you Phil for acknowledging that even an instant gratification world, mother nature has a way of reminding us, not only of who is more powerful, but that manmade "systems" built over many years, can become instant wreckage with a swipe of Ma nature's hand, be it earthquakes, tsunamis, blizzards, tornados or floods from any sort of storm.

It has been nice to see Democrat and Repubican alike working on solutions for a lot of people in the largest metropolitan area in the nation hit by a record breaking storm in breadth and power combined with other "perfect storm factors, like the timing of tides, location of other storm fronts, unusually warm water temperatures at such a northern latitude for this time of year. As you have mentioned and pointed out, while others from their easy chairs seem to think they know, as with the economic meltdown, just how long it "should" take to do things, having "been there" to survey the damage themselves and express their "expert" opinion on expectations.

Whether the aftermath of Katrina, blzzards, tornadoes, earthquakes, droughts or a storm like Sandy, people not only work to get people in need the basic essentials, but those people in need also need to realize that a switch cannot suddenly be flicked and all their troubles are gone.

I saw someone interviewed today while eating a hot meal from an emergency food kitchen complain about a lack of electricity. If the electricity were turned back on without checking out and fixing the damage and someone got electrocuted or a damaged gas line that leaked gas was ignited by damaged wires, would they complain about that?

Patience is considered a virtue. When mother nature or "god's nature" to some, demonstrates her power expecting all things will be back to normal in an unreasonable amount of time is perhaps contrary to learning something from life's and nature's lessons and demoinstrations and what (or who) is more powerful.

The difficulty in voting tomorrow for many who are now homeless may or may not be equally distributed amongst members of all parties. I imagine there are legions of attornies looking into how to deal with challenges to any equal accessibility and opportunities to vote. If specific districts known to be majorities of one party or another were damaged a great deal and many have sought shelter elsewhere with relatives who may not be close by or in other places, then there is likely to be some challenges to the vote based on disadvantages of some relative to those with little or no damage done to their communities.

I would hope all people have one interest in mind, fairness.

If they don't wish it for others, I don't know why they should expect it for themselves.
 
i hope that is the case as well.

though we know full well that accusations will fly whether here in PJ or elsewjhere...if not already..
 
i hope that is the case as well.

though we know full well that accusations will fly whether here in PJ or elsewjhere...if not already..

Well Phil, trust, consideration of others and mutual respect seem to be required ingredients for fairness and where there are direct contradictions in "information" there appears to be one side or the other that is not forthcoming with the whole truth or any part of it. That leaves observers or people on either side of the conflicting "information" trying to defend the "information" they agree with over the contradictory information. That in itself does nothing to lead a search for the truth for all people to know. That leaves people who take the time to look for and are interested in where the truth might lie, having found something that looks close to it, at odds with those who have not taken the time, nor have the interest in seeking the truth, only in pushing what they believe profits them, regardless of whether it is truth or not.

If we all are not interested in the truth and fairness, what sort of society does anyone think they are going to get?

Is there honor amongst thieves and liars?

Perhaps what we need is a very old idea, working together to make a better society as a whole, not working only to profit themselves.

In the words of one of the people who helped establish this nation.

Thomas Paine - 10 Jan. 1776

"In order to gain a clear and just idea of the design and end of government, let us suppose a small number of persons settled in some sequestered part of the earth, unconnected with the rest; they will then represent the first peopling of any country, or of the world. In this state of natural liberty, society will be their first thought. A thousand motives will excite them thereto; the strength of one man is so unequal to his wants, and his mind so unfitted for perpetual solitude, that he is soon obliged to seek assistance and relief of another, who in his turn requires the same. Four or five united would be able to raise a tolerable dwelling in the midst of a wilderness, but one man might labor out the common period of life without accomplishing any thing; when he had felled his timber he could not remove it, nor erect it after it was removed; hunger in the mean time would urge him to quit his work, and every different want would call him a different way. Disease, nay even misfortune, would be death; for though neither might be mortal, yet either would disable him from living, and reduce him to a state in which he might rather be said to perish than to die."

http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch4s4.html
 
Back
Top