Mm hmm.
Draconian sentence threatens journalists and news consumers
freedom.press
It is true that the U.S. has historically offered greater scope for democracy than many other countries, due to the long history of fights against the capitalist government led by the plebeian masses, the leftist stamp they put on its founding revolutions, and the extent to which the hoarded wealth gained from superexploitation of the colonial and semicolonial world created a population with more modest demands while allowing elasticity for strategically timed concessions. But the burgeoning dictatorship associated with Trumpism suggests that such is no longer the case.
It is also the case that people had more rights in the socialist German Democratic Republic than under Hitler’s capitalist regime, far more in Cuba than under the Somozas, Duarte, Duvalier, etc., more under Ho Chi Minh than under the successive South Vietnamese dictatorships, etc. Furthermore, when Chile attempted to build socialism through democratic elections and scrupulous observance of civil rights, the capitalists (through the U.S. government) organized a fascist coup that killed their leader and brought untold misery to their people, and when Nicaragua attempted to do the same, the capitalists (again through the U.S. government) organized a relentless terrorist war on its people that would not cease until their candidate … who restricted civil rights … was in power. This is what I mean when I say the growth in a workers’ state of a dictatorship that the enemies of socialism can use to undermine it reflects the external pressure of the capitalists.