Democrats’ new worry: what if Trump makes MORE successful foreign trips?

[as seen on tv]

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/12/politics/joe-biden-book-tour/index.html

Well, THAT didn’t take long. Before democrats could even take a victory lap for holding onto the Virginia governorship and their majority in the state legislature, they were pushed off the front page by Trump’s asian tour of important allies and trading partners.

The press is struggling to find a downside in this trip, and came up with two:

• North Korea’s lil’ Kim snarked that Trump was “old”. Trump tweeted back that Kim is “short and fat”, omitting the additional descriptor: “mentally deranged”. Our president didn’t want to needlessly provoke the boy king by reminding the world how Kim executed all his “old” relatives (including a half brother) by means such as poisoning, point blank anti-aircraft gunfire, and feeding them alive to wild dogs. Proof positive that “Game of Thrones” is somehow reaching North Korea, despite the firewall intended to block free information?
  
  
• The second “catastrophe” is even more serious. Someone caught Trump – yet again – making a funny face during a photo op. OMG, we thought this nightmare was finally over, once Obama and his endless smug/eyes closed mugging for the camera was no longer "a thing".

During his trip Trump signed 57 trade deals which had been negotiated in advance by Chinese and American profit oriented underlings. Although Trump is the (putative) author of the (ghost written) “Art of the Deal”, I doubt he read a single word of the 57-varieties of trade deals before he initialed them. And that’s a good thing. History has shown that he’s not a “reader”, and foreign trade is not his strength either. Chalk up a win for the swamp, here.

Back to the democrats’ dilemma.

How bad is it? It’s gotten SO BAD that some really old guy (older than Trump, Lil Kim!) named Joe Biden is claiming he’s going to run for president in 2020. No fooling – you can’t make this stuff up. Check out the link.

I see a hand at the back of the classroom. Yes?

“Miss ASOT – is this the same Joe Biden who dawdled in 2016 as fellow democrats beseeched him to save the party from Hillary? And who has all but stated outright that he was bullied into not entering the race by the “mean girls club” of Hillary, Debbie Wasserman Shultz, etc?”

Yes, my friend. That would be the one. A guy who was scared off from running by a couple of girls is now attempting to convince the nation that he’s the best guy to stand up to Lil Kim, Iran’s ayatollahs, Cuba, Russia, Syria’s Assad, ISIS . . . .

Of course, it might be Terry McAuliffe running in 2020. The guy who vacated the Virgina governorship to take a full time job creating PACs, campaign exploratory committees, and fund raising. Before Terrence was governor, though, his full time job was spear-carrier for the Clintons, so there’s THAT to consider. The Clinton brand is now seriously tarnished.

Ok, if not Biden or McAuliffe, how about Cory “do nothing” Booker? Democrats would be hard pressed to find someone more Obama-esque: virtually no paper trail. He's “articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking” (Biden’s 2008 description of Obama). What else could they want?

Or if you think millenials are more important to democrats’ 2020 prospects than improved black voter turnout, why not resurrect Bernie Sanders? Half of all young graduate with worthless liberal arts degrees believe socialism is a better system than the democrat or republican parties. Bonus factor – Bernie is REALLY old! So if someone hasn’t fed Lil Kim to his own dogs by then, a Sanders candidacy will drive short-round really crazy. (“Hey! Round eyes! Pay attention to me! You’re all begging for nuclear war if you make Sanders president!”)

Whom do I NOT expect the democrats to nominate in 2020 after the next iteration of crooked primaries? Not a woman (been there, done that, too soon for a replay); not a hispanic; not an LBGT; or a jew (Schumer, in case you’re not paying attention); not Jerry Brown; not Mark Cuban, or any other corporate CEO. No . . . it’s going to be an insider the democrat establishment can control. Not a Trumpian figure who would run on making a clean break from failed policies. Legacy failed policies are the only thing which democrats have: ballooning entitlements; drug legalization; ceding control of public schools to teachers unions; higher taxes. Without those policies democrats no platfform.

America does seem ready for a (stronger) 3rd party. However, I'm NOT saying 2020 is the year we’ll have a president who is neither "salt or pepper". But if a charismatic habanero, or vegan tofurky, or socialist makes a strong bid, the GOP might just luck out and be able to re-elect Trump, and again prevail over a divided left. The politics of racial identification may go from being the democrats' safety net to its Achilles heel.

In the meantime, look to Trump and team to try and swiftly capitalize on their asian success in the middle east.

That process has already begun in fact. The USA just opened its first permanent military base in Israel (yeah – like youI thought we probably had at least one already). Trump is aligning himself closer with Sunni regimes like Egypt (an army running a country) and Saudi Arabia (vowing to go moderate). The Iran deal is about to be buried. If Trump can broker some sort of Palestinian peace deal (a long shot still, at this stage) he will have achieved something that has eluded every US president from Truman to Obama.

Realpolitik has certain advantages over appeasement. History is clear on that point. However, China and Russia play Realpolitik much more skillfully than we do.

 

[Arkady]

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/12/politics/joe-biden-book-tour/index.html

Well, THAT didn’t take long. Before democrats could even take a victory lap for holding onto the Virginia governorship and their majority in the state legislature, they were pushed off the front page by Trump’s asian tour of important allies and trading partners.

The press is struggling to find a downside in this trip, and came up with two:

• North Korea’s lil’ Kim snarked that Trump was “old”. Trump tweeted back that Kim is “short and fat”, omitting the additional descriptor: “mentally deranged”. Our president didn’t want to needlessly provoke the boy king by reminding the world how Kim executed all his “old” relatives (including a half brother) by means such as poisoning, point blank anti-aircraft gunfire, and feeding them alive to wild dogs. Proof positive that “Game of Thrones” is somehow reaching North Korea, despite the firewall intended to block free information?
  
  
• The second “catastrophe” is even more serious. Someone caught Trump – yet again – making a funny face during a photo op. OMG, we thought this nightmare was finally over, once Obama and his endless smug/eyes closed mugging for the camera was no longer "a thing".

During his trip Trump signed 57 trade deals which had been negotiated in advance by Chinese and American profit oriented underlings. Although Trump is the (putative) author of the (ghost written) “Art of the Deal”, I doubt he read a single word of the 57-varieties of trade deals before he initialed them. And that’s a good thing. History has shown that he’s not a “reader”, and foreign trade is not his strength either. Chalk up a win for the swamp, here.

Back to the democrats’ dilemma.

How bad is it? It’s gotten SO BAD that some really old guy (older than Trump, Lil Kim!) named Joe Biden is claiming he’s going to run for president in 2020. No fooling – you can’t make this stuff up. Check out the link.

I see a hand at the back of the classroom. Yes?

“Miss ASOT – is this the same Joe Biden who dawdled in 2016 as fellow democrats beseeched him to save the party from Hillary? And who has all but stated outright that he was bullied into not entering the race by the “mean girls club” of Hillary, Debbie Wasserman Shultz, etc?”

Yes, my friend. That would be the one. A guy who was scared off from running by a couple of girls is now attempting to convince the nation that he’s the best guy to stand up to Lil Kim, Iran’s ayatollahs, Cuba, Russia, Syria’s Assad, ISIS . . . .

Of course, it might be Terry McAuliffe running in 2020. The guy who vacated the Virgina governorship to take a full time job creating PACs, campaign exploratory committees, and fund raising. Before Terrence was governor, though, his full time job was spear-carrier for the Clintons, so there’s THAT to consider. The Clinton brand is now seriously tarnished.

Ok, if not Biden or McAuliffe, how about Cory “do nothing” Booker? Democrats would be hard pressed to find someone more Obama-esque: virtually no paper trail. He's “articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking” (Biden’s 2008 description of Obama). What else could they want?

Or if you think millenials are more important to democrats’ 2020 prospects than improved black voter turnout, why not resurrect Bernie Sanders? Half of all young graduate with worthless liberal arts degrees believe socialism is a better system than the democrat or republican parties. Bonus factor – Bernie is REALLY old! So if someone hasn’t fed Lil Kim to his own dogs by then, a Sanders candidacy will drive short-round really crazy. (“Hey! Round eyes! Pay attention to me! You’re all begging for nuclear war if you make Sanders president!”)

Whom do I NOT expect the democrats to nominate in 2020 after the next iteration of crooked primaries? Not a woman (been there, done that, too soon for a replay); not a hispanic; not an LBGT; or a jew (Schumer, in case you’re not paying attention); not Jerry Brown; not Mark Cuban, or any other corporate CEO. No . . . it’s going to be an insider the democrat establishment can control. Not a Trumpian figure who would run on making a clean break from failed policies. Legacy failed policies are the only thing which democrats have: ballooning entitlements; drug legalization; ceding control of public schools to teachers unions; higher taxes. Without those policies democrats no platfform.

America does seem ready for a (stronger) 3rd party. However, I'm NOT saying 2020 is the year we’ll have a president who is neither "salt or pepper". But if a charismatic habanero, or vegan tofurky, or socialist makes a strong bid, the GOP might just luck out and be able to re-elect Trump, and again prevail over a divided left. The politics of racial identification may go from being the democrats' safety net to its Achilles heel.

In the meantime, look to Trump and team to try and swiftly capitalize on their asian success in the middle east.

That process has already begun in fact. The USA just opened its first permanent military base in Israel (yeah – like youI thought we probably had at least one already). Trump is aligning himself closer with Sunni regimes like Egypt (an army running a country) and Saudi Arabia (vowing to go moderate). The Iran deal is about to be buried. If Trump can broker some sort of Palestinian peace deal (a long shot still, at this stage) he will have achieved something that has eluded every US president from Truman to Obama.

Realpolitik has certain advantages over appeasement. History is clear on that point. However, China and Russia play Realpolitik much more skillfully than we do.

This trip was a spectacular flop for Trump. But, that won't stop the usual suspects from trying to say up is down and down is up. Can you imagine if any president before Trump had called the leader of a (nuclear-armed!) foreign country "short and fat"? It would be portrayed as a complete melt-down and we'd be questioning the man's sanity. But that's just how far the bar has been lowered. When Trump manages to return from a foreign trip without actually having started a war, it's branded a success by his apologists.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/12/politics/joe-biden-book-tour/index.html

Well, THAT didn’t take long. Before democrats could even take a victory lap for holding onto the Virginia governorship and their majority in the state legislature, they were pushed off the front page by Trump’s asian tour of important allies and trading partners.

The press is struggling to find a downside in this trip, and came up with two:

• North Korea’s lil’ Kim snarked that Trump was “old”. Trump tweeted back that Kim is “short and fat”, omitting the additional descriptor: “mentally deranged”. Our president didn’t want to needlessly provoke the boy king by reminding the world how Kim executed all his “old” relatives (including a half brother) by means such as poisoning, point blank anti-aircraft gunfire, and feeding them alive to wild dogs. Proof positive that “Game of Thrones” is somehow reaching North Korea, despite the firewall intended to block free information?
  
  
• The second “catastrophe” is even more serious. Someone caught Trump – yet again – making a funny face during a photo op. OMG, we thought this nightmare was finally over, once Obama and his endless smug/eyes closed mugging for the camera was no longer "a thing".

During his trip Trump signed 57 trade deals which had been negotiated in advance by Chinese and American profit oriented underlings. Although Trump is the (putative) author of the (ghost written) “Art of the Deal”, I doubt he read a single word of the 57-varieties of trade deals before he initialed them. And that’s a good thing. History has shown that he’s not a “reader”, and foreign trade is not his strength either. Chalk up a win for the swamp, here.

Back to the democrats’ dilemma.

How bad is it? It’s gotten SO BAD that some really old guy (older than Trump, Lil Kim!) named Joe Biden is claiming he’s going to run for president in 2020. No fooling – you can’t make this stuff up. Check out the link.

I see a hand at the back of the classroom. Yes?

“Miss ASOT – is this the same Joe Biden who dawdled in 2016 as fellow democrats beseeched him to save the party from Hillary? And who has all but stated outright that he was bullied into not entering the race by the “mean girls club” of Hillary, Debbie Wasserman Shultz, etc?”

Yes, my friend. That would be the one. A guy who was scared off from running by a couple of girls is now attempting to convince the nation that he’s the best guy to stand up to Lil Kim, Iran’s ayatollahs, Cuba, Russia, Syria’s Assad, ISIS . . . .

Of course, it might be Terry McAuliffe running in 2020. The guy who vacated the Virgina governorship to take a full time job creating PACs, campaign exploratory committees, and fund raising. Before Terrence was governor, though, his full time job was spear-carrier for the Clintons, so there’s THAT to consider. The Clinton brand is now seriously tarnished.

Ok, if not Biden or McAuliffe, how about Cory “do nothing” Booker? Democrats would be hard pressed to find someone more Obama-esque: virtually no paper trail. He's “articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking” (Biden’s 2008 description of Obama). What else could they want?

Or if you think millenials are more important to democrats’ 2020 prospects than improved black voter turnout, why not resurrect Bernie Sanders? Half of all young graduate with worthless liberal arts degrees believe socialism is a better system than the democrat or republican parties. Bonus factor – Bernie is REALLY old! So if someone hasn’t fed Lil Kim to his own dogs by then, a Sanders candidacy will drive short-round really crazy. (“Hey! Round eyes! Pay attention to me! You’re all begging for nuclear war if you make Sanders president!”)

Whom do I NOT expect the democrats to nominate in 2020 after the next iteration of crooked primaries? Not a woman (been there, done that, too soon for a replay); not a hispanic; not an LBGT; or a jew (Schumer, in case you’re not paying attention); not Jerry Brown; not Mark Cuban, or any other corporate CEO. No . . . it’s going to be an insider the democrat establishment can control. Not a Trumpian figure who would run on making a clean break from failed policies. Legacy failed policies are the only thing which democrats have: ballooning entitlements; drug legalization; ceding control of public schools to teachers unions; higher taxes. Without those policies democrats no platfform.

America does seem ready for a (stronger) 3rd party. However, I'm NOT saying 2020 is the year we’ll have a president who is neither "salt or pepper". But if a charismatic habanero, or vegan tofurky, or socialist makes a strong bid, the GOP might just luck out and be able to re-elect Trump, and again prevail over a divided left. The politics of racial identification may go from being the democrats' safety net to its Achilles heel.

In the meantime, look to Trump and team to try and swiftly capitalize on their asian success in the middle east.

That process has already begun in fact. The USA just opened its first permanent military base in Israel (yeah – like youI thought we probably had at least one already). Trump is aligning himself closer with Sunni regimes like Egypt (an army running a country) and Saudi Arabia (vowing to go moderate). The Iran deal is about to be buried. If Trump can broker some sort of Palestinian peace deal (a long shot still, at this stage) he will have achieved something that has eluded every US president from Truman to Obama.

Realpolitik has certain advantages over appeasement. History is clear on that point. However, China and Russia play Realpolitik much more skillfully than we do.

More?

LOL

;-)

 

[Boca]

This trip was a spectacular flop for Trump. But, that won't stop the usual suspects from trying to say up is down and down is up. Can you imagine if any president before Trump had called the leader of a (nuclear-armed!) foreign country "short and fat"? It would be portrayed as a complete melt-down and we'd be questioning the man's sanity. But that's just how far the bar has been lowered. When Trump manages to return from a foreign trip without actually having started a war, it's branded a success by his apologists.

Short and fat is all you got? That's pretty funny considering your short and fat candidate last November called half the country everything but!

That aside, $250 billion in trade deals; shoring up Asian opposition --- they who have the most to lose nuke wise---) to the short and fat and insane little dude with a sort of Mohawk coiffure is another good deal; honored as the only U.S. President to enjoy a State Dinner in the Forbidden City gets a high mark too.

Contrast that with your boy being forced to leave by the back of his bus.

 

[as seen on tv]

This trip was a spectacular flop for Trump. But, that won't stop the usual suspects from trying to say up is down and down is up. Can you imagine if any president before Trump had called the leader of a (nuclear-armed!) foreign country "short and fat"? It would be portrayed as a complete melt-down and we'd be questioning the man's sanity. But that's just how far the bar has been lowered. When Trump manages to return from a foreign trip without actually having started a war, it's branded a success by his apologists.

in what way was it a flop? CNN and MSNBC have been unable to come up with anything more cogent than "funny face". you appear to be off the radarscope of even the most anti-trump press.

 

[as seen on tv]

Short and fat is all you got? That's pretty funny considering your short and fat candidate last November called half the country everything but!

That aside, $250 billion in trade deals; shoring up Asian opposition --- they who have the most to lose nuke wise---) to the short and fat and insane little dude with a sort of Mohawk coiffure is another good deal; honored as the only U.S. President to enjoy a State Dinner in the Forbidden City gets a high mark too.

Contrast that with your boy being forced to leave by the back of his bus.

i have to admit that i haven't read the trade deals yet. but i endorse tightly constructed bicameral deals in principle, as opposed to "35 nation, tree hugging, global warming" deals which are short on specifics but big on opening other markets to china.

I'm not sure what China is going to purchase "$250 billion" of, from the USA. We really aren't competitive in tech/manufacturing right now.

Perhaps the usual agricultural suspects? corn, wheat, soybeans, chicken, beef, pork? i don't think they need coal. Maybe timber?

 

[Boca]

i have to admit that i haven't read the trade deals yet. but i endorse tightly constructed bicameral deals in principle, as opposed to "35 nation, tree hugging, global warming" deals which are short on specifics but big on opening other markets to china.

I'm not sure what China is going to purchase "$250 billion" of, from the USA. We really aren't competitive in tech/manufacturing right now.

Perhaps the usual agricultural suspects? corn, wheat, soybeans, chicken, beef, pork? i don't think they need coal. Maybe timber?

I don't know that they are all new deals as opposed to renegotiated deals?

 

[marvin martian]

This trip was a spectacular flop for Trump. But, that won't stop the usual suspects from trying to say up is down and down is up. Can you imagine if any president before Trump had called the leader of a (nuclear-armed!) foreign country "short and fat"? It would be portrayed as a complete melt-down and we'd be questioning the man's sanity. But that's just how far the bar has been lowered. When Trump manages to return from a foreign trip without actually having started a war, it's branded a success by his apologists.

So, name calling is bad, right?

Clinton's polling numbers went up in the wake of the deplorables comment. It pissed off the halfwits and the sub-human scum who were embarrassed to realize that people recognized how deplorable they were, but they already supported Trump, so it made no difference what they thought.

Question: What's the square root of negative one?

Answer: A Trump voter who isn't sub-human scum.

 

[Alinvegas]

This trip was a spectacular flop for Trump. But, that won't stop the usual suspects from trying to say up is down and down is up. Can you imagine if any president before Trump had called the leader of a (nuclear-armed!) foreign country "short and fat"? It would be portrayed as a complete melt-down and we'd be questioning the man's sanity. But that's just how far the bar has been lowered. When Trump manages to return from a foreign trip without actually having started a war, it's branded a success by his apologists.

Right from the mouth of Chucky Scummer hisself.

 

[4/15]

Dear Donald is a failure of the grandist kind. Just like the street magician who hides the pea that was never there.

 

[as seen on tv]

Right from the mouth of Chucky Scummer hisself.

schumer has remained curiously silent. could that be because - as part of the $250 billion trade deal, china will be importing $10 million worth of "MD 2020 wine", made right in upstate NY, home to senator schumer?

in a good trade deal, it's win-win, and everyone makes money, right?

 

[Dawg]

Dear Donald is a failure of the grandist kind. Just like the street magician who hides the pea that was never there.

9th Circuit disagrees with you

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/u...-effect/ar-BBEV8Iv?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp

 

[Arkady]

Short and fat is all you got? That's pretty funny considering your short and fat candidate last November called half the country everything but!

That aside, $250 billion in trade deals; shoring up Asian opposition --- they who have the most to lose nuke wise---) to the short and fat and insane little dude with a sort of Mohawk coiffure is another good deal; honored as the only U.S. President to enjoy a State Dinner in the Forbidden City gets a high mark too.

Contrast that with your boy being forced to leave by the back of his bus.

If the standard is getting some non-binding trade deals, that's a low standard indeed. There's no cost to handing Trump those talking points. If he eventually gets any binding agreements, let me know.

 

[Arkady]

So, name calling is bad, right?

For a president dealing with foreign leaders, yes. If I were president and you were the leader of a nuclear-armed foreign country, it would, of course, be wildly irresponsible for me to call attention to the fact that you're sub-human scum. But since you're utterly irrelevant in this world, it doesn't matter at all what I call you.

 

[marvin martian]

For a president dealing with foreign leaders, yes. If I were president and you were the leader of a nuclear-armed foreign country, it would, of course, be wildly irresponsible for me to call attention to the fact that you're sub-human scum. But since you're utterly irrelevant in this world, it doesn't matter at all what I call you.

It's adorable how you keep desperately trying to get anyone to believe your lie that you were only referring to me when you used the historically documented dehumanizing slurs of the Third Reich, when your quote makes it abundantly clear you were referring, Himmler-like, to nearly 64 million Americans, the vast majority of whom are totally unknown to you, as befits a Nazi of your caliber.

So, one more time for you Arkadolf:

You:

Clinton's polling numbers went up in the wake of the deplorables comment. It pissed off the halfwits and the sub-human scum who were embarrassed to realize that people recognized how deplorable they were, but they already supported Trump, so it made no difference what they thought.

Question: What's the square root of negative one?

Answer: A Trump voter who isn't sub-human scum.

Your forebear:

We shall take care that never again in Germany, the heart of Europe, will the Jewish-Bolshevistic revolution of subhumans be able to be kindled either from within or through emissaries from without.

- Heinrich Himmler

 

[Arkady]

It's adorable how you keep desperately trying to get anyone to believe your lie that you were only referring to me when you used the historically documented dehumanizing slurs of the Third Reich, when your quote makes it abundantly clear you were referring, Himmler-like, to nearly 64 million Americans, the vast majority of whom are totally unknown to you, as befits a Nazi of your caliber.

So, one more time for you Arkadolf:

You:




Your forebear:

We shall take care that never again in Germany, the heart of Europe, will the Jewish-Bolshevistic revolution of subhumans be able to be kindled either from within or through emissaries from without.

- Heinrich Himmler

Ah, look, the dear little things feelings got hurt.

Pro-tip: if you don't want people calling you out for being sub-human scum, try not to act like sub-human scum. Good luck, bitch.

 

[marvin martian]

Ah, look, the dear little things feelings got hurt.

Pro-tip: if you don't want people calling you out for being sub-human scum, try not to act like sub-human scum. Good luck, bitch.

You're not fooling anyone, Arkadolf (even your poor grammar is giving away how much this gets to you).

Your Himmler-esque slurs are out there for all to see, and I'll be sure to keep reminding you what a Nazi piece of shit you are.

You:

Clinton's polling numbers went up in the wake of the deplorables comment. It pissed off the halfwits and the sub-human scum who were embarrassed to realize that people recognized how deplorable they were, but they already supported Trump, so it made no difference what they thought.

Question: What's the square root of negative one?

Answer: A Trump voter who isn't sub-human scum.

Your forebear:

We shall take care that never again in Germany, the heart of Europe, will the Jewish-Bolshevistic revolution of subhumans be able to be kindled either from within or through emissaries from without.

- Heinrich Himmler

 

[Drumcollie]

This trip was a spectacular flop for Trump. But, that won't stop the usual suspects from trying to say up is down and down is up. Can you imagine if any president before Trump had called the leader of a (nuclear-armed!) foreign country "short and fat"? It would be portrayed as a complete melt-down and we'd be questioning the man's sanity. But that's just how far the bar has been lowered. When Trump manages to return from a foreign trip without actually having started a war, it's branded a success by his apologists.

Can you imagine if any president before Trump had called the leader of a (nuclear-armed!) foreign country "short and fat"?

Obama would have praised and sent Nuclear material.

It would be portrayed as a complete melt-down and we'd be questioning the man's sanity

And since you are not a qualified professional to make that diagnosis. we just leave it at what it really is...A haters opinion.

When Trump manages to return from a foreign trip without actually having started a war, it's branded a success by his apologists

Who is apologizing...looks more like you as the apologist:

Umm sorry Trump had to be a douche to the people who would kills us.

If you leave the wasp's nest alone....

Trump went to Chine and garnered more support from the Chinese to tell it's partner to back down. Obama never could accomplish that from his policies. Obama let North Korea go rogue.

 

[Drumcollie]

Ah, look, the dear little things feelings got hurt.

Pro-tip: if you don't want people calling you out for being sub-human scum, try not to act like sub-human scum. Good luck, bitch.

Says the white supremacist...Glass houses!

 

[marvin martian]

Obama would have praised and sent Nuclear material.




And since you are not a qualified professional to make that diagnosis. we just leave it at what it really is...A haters opinion.



Who is apologizing...looks more like you as the apologist:

Umm sorry Trump had to be a douche to the people who would kills us.

If you leave the wasp's nest alone....

Trump went to Chine and garnered more support from the Chinese to tell it's partner to back down. Obama never could accomplish that from his policies. Obama let North Korea go rogue.

The North Korean situation, of course, only exists because of limp-dicks like Barack Obama, who allowed it to fester and get worse while his supporters were cheering on his summary executions of American citizens and his blatant racism.