888888
Council Member
Does anyone really think that after giving the top 1% an average 80,000 a year tax break since 2001, another 80,000 a year (that's 160,000) will somehow do something different? Just how will this help, what will it do?
Now I hear that it will be offset by removal of deductions and you won't really be getting anymore. We can't be told what ones he plans on ending, or how many things will go away, only that it will make it neutral. Then why do it? And what deductions can you end that will amount to making an 80,000 a year tax cut be Neutral, is this more fuzzy math or just plain BS?
I keep hearing how Romney thinks that Americans should keep more of their own money and that is why we need to give these new rates a chance, and then he says in the next statement that NO, you won't have anymore money because we plan on eliminating deductions, the devil is in the details so we will tell you after the election.
Does anyone really believe this guy?
Now I hear that it will be offset by removal of deductions and you won't really be getting anymore. We can't be told what ones he plans on ending, or how many things will go away, only that it will make it neutral. Then why do it? And what deductions can you end that will amount to making an 80,000 a year tax cut be Neutral, is this more fuzzy math or just plain BS?
I keep hearing how Romney thinks that Americans should keep more of their own money and that is why we need to give these new rates a chance, and then he says in the next statement that NO, you won't have anymore money because we plan on eliminating deductions, the devil is in the details so we will tell you after the election.
Does anyone really believe this guy?
