New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Election postscript

middleview said:
The affidavit is as much evidence as is the statement from the County investigator that there was no fraud.
Click to expand...

The suspicions start the investigations. You Democrats should have said yes to voter ID and "But the state has to issue voter ID free to those demonstrating need."


But noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo you guys harbor distrust in the election system by calling racism and voter suppression to get voter id suppressed. ha ha

10 to 20 million illegal aliens and you act like the situation is the same as back in the 1970's

You should apologize for your behavior getting Trump elected. I thank you.
 
resident_evil said:
The suspicions start the investigations. You Democrats should have said yes to voter ID and "But the state has to issue voter ID free to those demonstrating need."


But noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo you guys harbor distrust in the election system by calling racism and voter suppression to get voter id suppressed. ha ha

10 to 20 million illegal aliens and you act like the situation is the same as back in the 1970's

You should apologize for your behavior getting Trump elected. I thank you.
Click to expand...

You clearly have not read my post on voter id.

By the way, the affidavit was about mail in ballots.
 
middleview said:
Is the statement from the investigation also evidence?
Click to expand...

What a shame you are not moral enough to answer a simple question that is based DIRECTLY on YOUR previous question. Yes, of course the statement from the investigation is also evidence.
 
The Thinker said:
What a shame you are not moral enough to answer a simple question that is based DIRECTLY on YOUR previous question. Yes, of course the statement from the investigation is also evidence.
Click to expand...

As I said before, you have a she said, he said situation and that is not proof. Her word is not even evidence in my view. She saw stacks of paper from a distance. An accusation is not evidence.

To be perfectly honest, the statement from the investigator isn't evidence either. If they then offered some paper trail showing those four people had been instructed to transfer mail in ballots to scanable ballots, or if they produced both the mail in ballot and the copy...that would be evidence.
 
resident_evil said:
I believe it is highly likely that Trump had votes stolen at the polls. His actual votes were much more than what he ended up with but because the theft was meant to be statistically stealthy, he was still able to win because of the greater margin the Democrat thieves could not overcome.

Question why the late reporting precincts were always the high density Democrat strong holds. It takes time to steal an election.
Click to expand...
The left won't recover for decades

Every dirty trick failed.

They have been exposed.
 
Capitalist said:
You realize those two are not mutually exclusive right?

CIA agents show up all the time at US embassies. You knew that, right?
Click to expand...

And do you have any evidence that Stevens worked for the CIA?
How about evidence that the terrorists had hacked Hillary's email or had somehow gained access to her email?

The ambassador would not make a good agent because they are too well known and cannot do any kind of covert gathering of information.
 
Wolfert Webber said:
The left won't recover for decades

Every dirty trick failed.

They have been exposed.
Click to expand...

Trump is going to make sure that "W" doesn't go down as the worst president ever.
The democrats will take congress in 2018 and the White House in 2020...

People forgot just how bad republican government proved to be...Trump will remind them.
 
Denial.

Get over it, Left gambled all with every dirty trick, and lost all.

We will deconstruct Obamaism like communism was.
 
middleview said:
As I said before, you have a she said, he said situation and that is not proof. Her word is not even evidence in my view. She saw stacks of paper from a distance. An accusation is not evidence.

To be perfectly honest, the statement from the investigator isn't evidence either. If they then offered some paper trail showing those four people had been instructed to transfer mail in ballots to scanable ballots, or if they produced both the mail in ballot and the copy...that would be evidence.
Click to expand...
So nothing would convince you.

Then why bother demanding evidence?
 
middleview said:
And do you have any evidence that Stevens worked for the CIA?
Click to expand...
You've already shown that evidence wouldn't convince you so why bother?

At any rate, "evidence" that Stevens was CIA would be classified. So do your little dance against the truth and go back to your cave of ignorance.
 
middleview said:
Valerie Plame mean anything to you? Do you actually know of any agents who had their cover blown?
Click to expand...
Nope, but then, how the heck would I? I heard from the rumor mill that quite a few had to run for their lives and a couple didn't run fast enough. It stands to reason when you expose all the nations secrets on an unsecure server that their cover was blown. Benghazi deaths are an example.

It has been widely circulated that these leaks from the DNC are all internal. payback.
 
Days said:
Nope, but then, how the heck would I? I heard from the rumor mill that quite a few had to run for their lives and a couple didn't run fast enough. It stands to reason when you expose all the nations secrets on an unsecure server that their cover was blown. Benghazi deaths are an example.

It has been widely circulated that these leaks from the DNC are all internal. payback.
Click to expand...

Who is your source to state that covert agents were killed due to leaks?

"all the nation's secrets" is a nutty thing to say. She was secretary of state, not defense.
The only confidential memos I've heard of were related to having gotten info from some members of foreign governments....one of which the author sent to Abedin with "Eyes only" in the email...whatever that means.

The Benghazi deaths have nothing at all to do with Hillary's email.
 
Capitalist said:
You've already shown that evidence wouldn't convince you so why bother?

At any rate, "evidence" that Stevens was CIA would be classified. So do your little dance against the truth and go back to your cave of ignorance.
Click to expand...

1. "evidence" from you guys amounts to blogs or bullshit from sources like Drudge or Brietbart. I've certainly responded to even silly attempts at providing facts from you with actual and verifiable information.

2. Yes, any person acting as a covert agent would be protected by the covert identities act...as was Valerie Plame's name and status with the CIA. Your little attempt at saying Stevens was an agent or that his identity was revealed by an email from Hillary is simply unsubstantiated bullshit. There is no "truth" for me to deal with in your email.
 
middleview said:
Trump is going to make sure that "W" doesn't go down as the worst president ever.
The democrats will take congress in 2018 and the White House in 2020...

People forgot just how bad republican government proved to be...Trump will remind them.
Click to expand...
Only because the Clinton News Network, ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC et al will be feverishly working to sabotage this administration. We're watching those fuckers. They better take a breath and think before they broadcast or their studio will be torn down around them.
 
resident_evil said:
Only because the Clinton News Network, ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC et al will be feverishly working to sabotage this administration. We're watching those fuckers. They better take a breath and think before they broadcast or their studio will be torn down around them.
Click to expand...

Trump will not need help to f*ck things up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top