New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Embarrassing

If you are on the left or the right or just in the middle somewhere there is little doubt that concerning the handling of the crisis in Syria Obama has become an embarrassment to our nation. Leading from behind has proven yet another failure for Obama. I was thinking trying to be objective and when I look at the Obama legacy and his overall performance as our commander in chief it struck me that his handling of Syria is a mirror image of his presidency. Mr. President you cannot have it both ways and your never ending blame game and your apologetic speaking tours have weakened America. Your fundamental change is not the kind of change most of us anticipated nor desired. Now as Obama literally sits on the side lines we are to take direction from a Russian Thug a former KGB agent and a country who assists Iran as well as Syria. This is crazy stuff. The problem is not what to do in Syria the real problem is credibility if it be Putin or Assad but the real credibility loss lies in Obama. The Congress as well as the American electorate has lost confidence and trust in our president. Are we to be dictated to by international criminals are we to trust and arm the very folks who are trying to kill all of us. This is insane. Obama needs to lead, he needs to stand up to any faction that threatens our national security. The use and spread of chemical as well as nuclear weapons is that threat. Giving North Korea, Iran. or Syria the green light is not in our best interest.
 
Last edited:
Obama, along with those who voted for him (especially twice) should be mortified at what he's managed to do. Even Jimmy Carter looks almost stellar next to Obama. I'm mortified at his performance and I knew better than to vote for him. I really don't even want to talk about how bad he is. But you have spelled it out perfectly here.
 
Obama, along with those who voted for him (especially twice) should be mortified at what he's managed to do. Even Jimmy Carter looks almost stellar next to Obama. I'm mortified at his performance and I knew better than to vote for him. I really don't even want to talk about how bad he is. But you have spelled it out perfectly here.


It's just devastating what he did.....you wanted a war and he wouldn't give it to you. You wanted him to fail and he got just what he wanted without a shot being fired. Your hatred is pathological..
 
It's just devastating what he did.....you wanted a war and he wouldn't give it to you. You wanted him to fail and he got just what he wanted without a shot being fired. Your hatred is pathological..

you must be either on drugs or lying out your a-hole..........Americans wanted nothing to do with WAR in Syria..........but your 'GOD' 'O' shot off his bird-legs mouth with his "RED LINE"...........'O' didn't get what he wanted........he got played like an idiot.........
 
It's just devastating what he did.....you wanted a war and he wouldn't give it to you. You wanted him to fail and he got just what he wanted without a shot being fired. Your hatred is pathological..

You have the "qualification" to say my "hatred is pathological"?
You are sick.
I truly have to pity anyone who has been unfortunate enough to come in contact with you in person because that you can say that sort of thing to a complete stranger indicates some sort of major and sickening flaw in you as a person.
 
...please explain why, if Russia is a "leader" they did NOT offer this "solution" BEFORE Obama's decision to intervene?

...let me help you, because before the threat, they had no reason to do anything other than continue to supply weapons to ass-ad. Obama's declaration, scared the bejesus out of pootie who then reached agreement with Obama at the G-20....

Russia/pootie leaders? Not so much...
 
You have the "qualification" to say my "hatred is pathological"?
You are sick.
I truly have to pity anyone who has been unfortunate enough to come in contact with you in person because that you can say that sort of thing to a complete stranger indicates some sort of major and sickening flaw in you as a person.


I don't have to be a therapist to know that Charles Manson is. a psychopath, I don't have to be a therapist to know you have an obsessive hatred for Obama, I truly pity anyone who has the unfortunate experience of getting on your bad side
PS do you see the humor in your hypocrisy? You have told me and others we are "sick" and aren't we complete strangers? Or are we buddies. Once again.....taking the higher moral ground while shooting from the gutter.
 
...please explain why, if Russia is a "leader" they did NOT offer this "solution" BEFORE Obama's decision to intervene?

...let me help you, because before the threat, they had no reason to do anything other than continue to supply weapons to ass-ad. Obama's declaration, scared the bejesus out of pootie who then reached agreement with Obama at the G-20....

Russia/pootie leaders? Not so much...


Note.....they never answer that simple question. If Obama said nothing would syria and Russian have stopped their actions? What caused them to agree to what they agreed to?
 
You have the "qualification" to say my "hatred is pathological"?
You are sick.

I truly have to pity anyone who has been unfortunate enough to come in contact with you in person because that you can say that sort of thing to a complete stranger indicates some sort of major and sickening flaw in you as a person.

Apparently you have the qualification...

"You are sick"
"major and sickening flaw in you"
 
It's just devastating what he did.....you wanted a war and he wouldn't give it to you. You wanted him to fail and he got just what he wanted without a shot being fired. Your hatred is pathological..

You must not have noticed how often Obama indicated that he wanted to get on with firing missiles into Syria, which is an act of war btw, without permission from anybody. He ONLY went to congress for their blessing AFTER he realized that the threats about impeaching him were real if he acted alone.

He's still making noises about firing those missiles. It's ALL still on the table as they say. In the meantime there is no proof that Assad used chemical weapons on his own people. There's a lot more proof that the 'rebels' did. Some of them have even admitted it. So as a 'reward' we send them more money and weapons.

You and quite a few other folks around here really do buy into whatever pap 'they' want you to swallow.
 
:cool:Obama Obliterates The Republican Myth That Putin Saved Him on Syria
By: Jason EasleySep. 15th, 2013 more from Jason Easley
http://www.politicususa.com/2013/09/15/obama-obliterates-republican-myth-putin-saved-syria.html
526913_636623546371585_364088948_n.jpg
:rolleyes:
 
Always happy to show you the disinjenuity you bring to the table.

Public boards are a bitch, no?

~shrug~ there are certain people of low repute on the boards, yes, but the boards themselves are inanimate. I'd say that (above) shoe fits you well.;)
 
You must not have noticed how often Obama indicated that he wanted to get on with firing missiles into Syria, which is an act of war btw, without permission from anybody. He ONLY went to congress for their blessing AFTER he realized that the threats about impeaching him were real if he acted alone.

He's still making noises about firing those missiles. It's ALL still on the table as they say. In the meantime there is no proof that Assad used chemical weapons on his own people. There's a lot more proof that the 'rebels' did. Some of them have even admitted it. So as a 'reward' we send them more money and weapons.

You and quite a few other folks around here really do buy into whatever pap 'they' want you to swallow.


You are wrong by the way.....
So do you support Assad? Interesting
 
~shrug~ there are certain people of low repute on the boards, yes, but the boards themselves are inanimate. I'd say that (above) shoe fits you well.;)

I do not believe my post includes a shoe...
 
You are wrong by the way.....
So do you support Assad? Interesting


I honest,y think you are disappointed in what most of the country sees as a positive result. I think you wanted him to bomb Syria so you could do your faux impeachment. Isn't it a good thing if Russia and Syria come about because of Obama's threat? Why doesn't that please you?
 
I honest,y think you are disappointed in what most of the country sees as a positive result. I think you wanted him to bomb Syria so you could do your faux impeachment. Isn't it a good thing if Russia and Syria come about because of Obama's threat? Why doesn't that please you?

If you were still answering me.................

First I would love to see us leave Syria alone altogether and certainly not bomb them.
An impeachment would be horrible because then we'd be stuck with Biden.
As for Russia and Syria supposedly coming around because of Obama's threat, I think it's because neither one of them want WW3 to get started.
You do know that Russia has missiles that are unstoppable and could easily blow a number of our ships out of the water, right?
I think it's time that our gov't learned some diplomacy. Diplomacy is not just buying other countries or blowing them up.

diplomacy |diˈplōməsē|nounthe profession, activity, or skill of managing international relations, typically by a country's representatives abroad : an extensive round of diplomacy in the Middle East.• the art of dealing with people in a sensitive and effective way : his genius for tact and diplomacy.ORIGIN late 18th cent.: from French diplomatie, from diplomatique‘diplomatic,’ on the pattern of aristocratie ‘aristocracy.’
 
Back
Top