New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Embassy Attacks

What cover up? Everytime Rice was on TV she said an investigation is under way, but our preliminary info is that it was a mob...So what?

What was the impact of not saying it was a terrorist attack? You guys keep saying that it was a political problem to admit it was Al Qaeda? It wasn't Al Qaeda, but please tell me who do you know that might have voted for Mitt if it had been? It is nonsense to say that even if it had been that it would change the situation. Al Qaeda is a mess and that they could fire a few mortar rounds at the consulate doesn't equate to an organization able to bring down the WTC.

No matter how you look at it, there was no downside to anything that Rice had to say.
 
BRU, do you know the meaning of 'covert'? You know, how we were able to kill bin laden?

Do you think it's possible that our intelligence depts. had a plan to find those responsible for the attacks on Benghazi using covert tactics by throwing the perpetrators off by claiming a false scenario? McBush, his bitch Lindsey, you and your ilk, have no idea about what happened, but here you all are.....endangering our security further by putting up a road block in the President's and counter-terrorism efforts to catch those bastards.

WTH is the matter with people like you? Is your hate for Obama greater than your love of country?
 
I am not certain that Obama knows the meaning of the word "covert" since he (in his desire to look like the hero) blabbed about the informant in Pakistan who enabled him to get Osama......... you know..........the guy who will die in a Pakistani prison due to Obama's indiscretion. Does Obama know the meaning of the word "covert"? Doubtful.

BRU, do you know the meaning of 'covert'? You know, how we were able to kill bin laden?

Do you think it's possible that our intelligence depts. had a plan to find those responsible for the attacks on Benghazi using covert tactics by throwing the perpetrators off by claiming a false scenario? McBush, his bitch Lindsey, you and your ilk, have no idea about what happened, but here you all are.....endangering our security further by putting up a road block in the President's and counter-terrorism efforts to catch those bastards.

WTH is the matter with people like you? Is your hate for Obama greater than your love of country?
 
BRU, do you know the meaning of 'covert'? You know, how we were able to kill bin laden?

Do you think it's possible that our intelligence depts. had a plan to find those responsible for the attacks on Benghazi using covert tactics by throwing the perpetrators off by claiming a false scenario? McBush, his <img src=images/smilies/animated/censored.gif> Lindsey, you and your ilk, have no idea about what happened, but here you all are.....endangering our security further by putting up a road block in the President's and counter-terrorism efforts to catch those bastards.

WTH is the matter with people like you? Is your hate for Obama greater than your love of country?

Love of country? That's rich, I didn't start loving/being REAL proud of my country until we elected a half black muslim commie metrosexual who despises the British and southern gun toting gringos.

Throwing off the perpetrators??? You mean subterfuge??? Try political correctness and wishful thinking born of the same warped liberal brains who took equal offense to the video in question as the muslim pig humping bastards who burnt the embassy.

Here is an offensive video maybe you'll start a violent demonstration in response to it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgFgEqm3o60

The pen is mighter than the sword. The key board is a light saber!
 
You're lying, wookie-leeks. The administration never called it innocent or justified. If you had any sense of honor you'd hang your head in shame. But, of course, you are unabashedly immoral, so I'm not expecting any better from you.

Also, you misspelled Wookiee.
 
since he (in his desire to look like the hero) blabbed about the informant in Pakistan who enabled him to get Osama.........

More bs propaganda you heard on fox or read on some wingnut blog.

Show everyone here where Obama, himself, told of Shakil Afridi aiding in our attempt to kill bin laden.

It's a bald face lie.
 
I figured you would contort what happened to cover for your Messiah. No need for propaganda when the players out themselves with their own words. But those words fall on deaf ears that hear only the way the MSM spins them. Carry on..........you're no more awake than the sheep in this country that voted for Obama and refuse to hear anything that paints him in a bad light .

More bs propaganda you heard on fox or read on some wingnut blog.

Show everyone here where Obama, himself, told of Shakil Afridi aiding in our attempt to kill bin laden.

It's a bald face lie.
 
Ummmhmmm......enjoy making up crazy stuff and assigning it to others randomly. You are an expert at that.

hardly -- it was common knowledge to everyone not a deranged Obama-hater.

Some of them have been so victimized by that particular mental malady, which is why some are so CONfused and CONfounded that they don't realize that the cause of that particular "act of terror", whether due almost solely to a video (as was alleged by some on the scene) or was a pre-planned attack, it was still an "act of terror" as BHO noted.

Apparently those that deranged either have never known or have forgotten the definition of terrorism.

ter·ror·ism/ˈterəˌrizəm/Noun: The use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.

and killing people as they did, if over the video, was intended to do what to make a political point?

This is why it's largely futile to debate this issue with the deranged -- they don't even have full knowledge much less an understanding of all the relevant facts in the matter, and generally ignore them when their deranged interpretation of events is threatened.

As I understand it, those that also have high hopes and desires that BHO succeed in his second term are particularly susceptible to ODS and adhering strictly to their fabricated script on the matter.
 
Read this and weep all you Cons on Embassy Attacks.Guess who was President then?

Isn't Google Great?

http://www.allvoices.com/contribute...ed-during-the-bush-years-before-benghazi-many
Wow I didn't know this happened, why wasn't their a clammor in the press calling for thye heads of Bush ADM including him and that other elmer fudd guy who was the vice p. at the time?

Many embassies attacked during the Bush years before Benghazi



Benghazi : Libya | Nov 05, 2012 at 8:11 AM PST

By VeronicaS


The number of embassies attacked before Benghazi were many, so is Republican outrage now purely political?
Partisan politics has so polarized America that normal, honest behavior seems to be the oddity that stands out these days. Much ado is being made of Gov. Chris Christie’s common sense communication with President Obama during Sandy’s aftermath. Christie and the president working together for the good of the citizens who elected them for that very reason is seen as spectacular when it should have been the ordinary, the norm.

The attack of our embassy in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11,which resulted in four Americans being murdered, is now used as an opportunity to gain political points. Washington Republicans and the partisan pundits beyond have slapped on the war paint, donned the camouflage and are armed to the hilt—out to get Obama’s blood at all cost.

Now there is loud clamor for transparency and investigations, accusations of a cover-up and incompetence, with those doing the talking all the while professing to only want the truth as concerned Americans and conscientious politicians. Give me a break. The only conscientious concern here is self-serving partisan BS.

Where was all that concern for our men and women serving in embassies and consulates across the globe when all the other attacks and killings occurred?

Like in 2002 when the US Consulate in the Karachi, Pakistan, was attacked and 10 were killed?

Or in 2004 when the US embassy in Uzbekistan was attacked and two were killed and another nine injured?
How about in 2004, when the US Consulate in Saudi Arabia was stormed and 8 lost their lives?
There is more: In 2006, armed men attacked the US Embassy in Syria and one was murdered.

Then in 2007 a grenade was thrown at the US Embassy in Athens.
In 2008, the US Embassy in Serbia was set on fire.

In 2008, bombings in the US Embassy in Yemen killed 10.

Notice the dates, all before the Obama administration.

Not yet convinced that all the noise over Benghazi has nothing to do with love of countryman? How about the biggest, most catastrophic attack and murder of Americans? As a New Yorker, Sept. 11, 2001, is indelibly imprinted on my psyche and I’m sure on the rest of the country. 3,000 perished in the most brutal act of terror in our recent history—all under a Republican administration. George W. Bush and his team had nine warnings that al-Qaida would attack within the United States, but they did absolutely nothing. No one in that administration’s head rolled for that stunning incompetence.

But Republicans now want President Obama’s head for Benghazi.

Here is an excerpt from the Ninth Public Hearing of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States, held Thursday April 8, 2004, where Bush adviser Condoleezza Rice, is being questioned:
MS. RICE: I remember very well that the president was aware that there were issues inside the United States. He talked to people about this. But I don't remember the al Qaeda cells as being something that we were told we needed to do something about.
“MR. BEN-VENISTE: Isn't it a fact, Dr. Rice, that the Aug. 6 PDB warned against possible attacks in this country? And I ask you whether you recall the title of that PDB.
MS. RICE: I believe the title was "Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States." Now, the PDB --
MR. BEN-VENISTE: Thank you.

Rice, in uncharacteristic obtuseness, for she is an academically brilliant and accomplished woman, gave the above unbelievable answer. We all now know they knew of imminent danger facing American citizens, but buried their head in the proverbial sand, ostrich style. (Read the official transcript on that hearing here: Thursday, April 8, 2004 - National Commission on Terrorism).
 
The difference is that the administrations when those other attacks occurred didn't try to cover up the fact that they were terrorist attacks. This administration did that.
It's not that we were attacked.
It's the lies that came out afterwards and are still coming out.
It's not that hard to understand unless a person is conveniently being obtuse to cover for his/her "God and Savior"'s administration.
'nuff said.

These attacks happened on the Bush watch,Jen. You can parse words all you want. They happened and nothing any of the right can say will change that many died under Bush.

And your insult to Obama is laughable when you backed the biggest liar ever to be in the White House!
 
Yeah..........and he did it in such a sneaky fashion that nobody realized it until he said it in a debate with a moderator who was willing to actually enter the debate as a debater and support him, and then he denied it almost as soon as he admitted it and................left poor Susan Rice (who also apparently didn't realize it had been stated as "terror" by the President) hanging out there stating unequivocally that it was a VIDEO and NOT terrorism days after that sneaky little (pseudo) admission by the President in the Rose Garden.

I place you firmly wedged up that thimble with this administration, Mytzlplk.

So that is why you are so upset about the Terror bit?

Obama said it quite plainly from the Rose Garden. I heard him.And Romney got his head handed to him in the debate by none other than Candy Crowley:eek:) "'Proceed Governor!"
I had forgotten that until you reminded me!
 
well hells bells, now all you gotta do MaryAnne is show us where the prior administrations blamed it on a protest knowing FULL well it was a planned terrorist attack. Lefty always goes off the road when trying to defend their messiah. In fact I remember quite well how PISSED lefty used to get that the past administration even reported these terrorist attacks. screaming they were hyping terrorist attacks.
Apples and Oranges dear....sorry no cigar

Sorry,Bru! Dead people are not ,"Apples and Oranges!" Those people died in attacks on GW's watch,as did so many other innocent people,starting with the 3000 in the WTC.Then proceeding on to at least 4500 of our young. Innocent Iraqi's by the hundreds,Men,women and children.

If you guys want to keep up this pretend outrage I will show this again and again!
 
well, I share your sadism...lol Watching them squirming and floundering is a real pleasure I wouldn't have missed for the world...

I was more than willing to give the other side a chance,but not now. I will shove the victory back every chance I get when they lie like dogs.

I am so happy we have a good man in the White House for another 4 years to repair the damage Bush and his cronies did I have had a smile on my face ever since at 11PM on that Tuesday they announced that Ohio put Obama over the top! Say what you wish about my state we came through for Obama,and I love it!:eek:) See.my smile?
 
And does any of you commies remember the "vigorous debate" in Iran???

Probably not.

Note here,Wookie! My top post is about attacks while Bush was in office,not about Obama as all you righties have changed the subject,as usual when the truth hurts!
 
So...once again, why did the story change?

This is why there's a controversy surrounding Rice.
 
Let me be the fourth to call you a liar who puts party over country.

McCain, whose grudge is because of losing an election to Obama, and Graham, whose claim to fame is giving closing arguments in a phony impeachment production, lead the charge. Get a clue.

Morons who believe anything liars tell them are the problem in this country. Out the other side of their faces, they say "Obama is trying to divide the country." The 2012 Republicans are redefining hypocrisy. Thanks for doing your part.
 
What did McCain and Graham...let's not forget Ayotte- it ain't all white men- say that was untrue? What are the "morons", as opposed to you dedicated foot soldiers, wrong about?
 
Back
Top