New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Gary Johnson - NUTJOB!

Anyone considering voting for Gary Nutjob Johnson needs to sit down, take a deep breath, and examine this loon's policies. Johnson has been called "garrolous" for his long-winded radio commercials attacking the Republican & Democratic parties. It is really the nutty qualities of his words though that need scrutiny, rather than the quantity.

1. Immigration - wants to provide work visas (we're currently struggling to get rid of the ones we have); he also wants non-citizens to "obtain proof of employment" EARTH TO GARY: they're not allowed to be employed. He also claims they should "assimilate with our diverse society". EARTH TO GARY: when discovered, they are supposed to be DEPORTED.
His website goes on to say >> "Making it simpler and more efficient to enter the United States legally, will provide greater security than a wall, by allowing law enforcement to focus on those who threaten our country, not those who want to be a part of it." Sure, having cops ignore immigration, would allow them to focus more on other things. And having cops ignore auto theft would allow them to focus more on other things too. Only problem is when you wake up the morning, your car is gone.
EARTH TO GARY: ALL illegal aliens threaten our country. That's why they aren't allowed to come in. That's why our ancestors provided us with immigration law to protect us.

Harms of Immigration

1. Americans lose jobs. (especially Whites due to affirmative action).
2. Wage reduction.
3. Tax $ lost (due to off books work + lower wages paid).
4. Remittance $$$ lost. ($123 Billion/year).
5. Tax $$ lost to immigrants on welfare.
6. Increased crime.
7. Increased traffic congestion.
8. Increased pollution.
9. Overcrowding in hospital ERs.
10. Overcrowding in recreational facilities.
11. Overcrowding in government offices.
12. Overcrowding in schools.
13. Decrease in funds available for entitlements.
14. Cultural erosion.
15. Overuse of scarce resources (oil, gasoline, fresh water, jobs, electricity, food, etc)
16. Introduction of foreign diseases.
17. Influx of terrorists.

2. Foreign Policy & Military -website says >> "it is difficult to see how the wars we have waged...have made us safer. If anything, our meddling in the affairs of other nations has made us less safe."
EARTH TO GARY: There is an international jihad war being waged against us. We cannot make there be no war, just by saying we won't participate. The enemy is participating in coming after you, whether you act to defend yourself or not. And the troops in Afghanistan are in place where they can quickly seize/secure the 100+ NUCLEAR warheads in Afghanistan, if that fragile regime were to be toppled by jihadist enemies. Without that, we would be gambling with the nuclear annihilation of the US. (which is exactly what Garrolous Gambling Gary would have us do)

Website also says >> "imperialistic foreign policy makes it easier for ISIS, Al Qaeda, and other violent extremists to recruit new members." There's the looney liberal "recruitment "card again. Imagine if Eisenhower was told > "You better not invade France & Italy, to go after Germany. The Germans won't like it, and more Nazis will be recruited." Pheeeeeww!! (high-pitched whistle, eyes rolling around in head)
eusa_whistle.gif
eusa_snooty.gif


Or just imagine if MacArthur had been told >> "Oh No, Mac. You can't invade Iwo Jima or Okinawa. It'd get the Japanese people mad, and they, hitherto friendly or neutral toward the U.S., will flock toward Hirihito's imperialist soldiers."

Or if Truman was told >> "Sorry Harry. You can't nuke the Japs. They'll get mad" Johnson's mind boggling proposal for the military, has been to cut its budget an incredible 43%. His thinking is that jihadists will then like us and stop attacking us. Gary: see a doctor.

3. Free Trade - Johnson has long been a supporter of NAFTA and free trade.
  • No tariffs, no restrictions;
  • Eliminate needless barriers to free trade.
This is just the opposite of Donald Trump's proposal to enact tariff's on imported goods, which would help to bring US companies back to the US, and create millions of jobs HERE in the US.

Strike 1........Strike 2.......Strike 3.

.
 
Last edited:
If this joker makes it into the debates, he'll be smashed by Trump, on the immigration issue, in the same way Hillary will be.
 
Actually no they don't. In case you haven't noticed, our economy is stagnant and our population is aging (see Japan for reference). Immigration is EXACTLY what we need. We just need to start choosing them wisely instead of letting anyone and everyone come here at will. If an illegal has been here for a long time, has a clean criminal record and a history of being employed, we should give that guy a green card before he realizes he owes $175,000 as his share of the federal debt.

Even Trump isn't anti-immigration. He just (rightly) suggests we should make sure the ones we accept are good folks who want to assimilate.

Johnson/Weld are the only adults in the race...
 
Actually no they don't. In case you haven't noticed, our economy is stagnant and our population is aging (see Japan for reference). Immigration is EXACTLY what we need. We just need to start choosing them wisely instead of letting anyone and everyone come here at will. If an illegal has been here for a long time, has a clean criminal record and a history of being employed, we should give that guy a green card before he realizes he owes $175,000 as his share of the federal debt.

Even Trump isn't anti-immigration. He just (rightly) suggests we should make sure the ones we accept are good folks who want to assimilate.

Johnson/Weld are the only adults in the race...
Nonsense. Immigration is HORRIBLE for America. And it's been that way for a very long time. I remember teaching a college Geography class in 1975, that even then it was unacceptable.

Actually, the US passed its population optimum (relative to resource base) level in 1860, when we had 30 Million (about same as Canada now) If we had been smart enough to have an immigration POINT SYSTEM like Canada, instead of the ludicrous CHAIN MIGRATION we have, allowing people to pour in here, for decades, we might not not have been importing oil (from Canada) for so many years. Like them, we could have been EXporting it, and making lots of money, and we might not have the high debt level we have.

That's just one example/ here's the overall scope, in case you missed it the first time >>

Harms of Immigration

1. Americans lose jobs. (especially Whites due to affirmative action).

2. Wage reduction.

3. Tax $ lost (due to off books work + lower wages paid).

4. Remittance $$$ lost. ($123 Billion/year).

5. Tax $$ lost to immigrants on welfare.

6. Increased crime.

7. Increased traffic congestion.

8. Increased pollution.

9. Overcrowding in hospital ERs.

10. Overcrowding in recreational facilities.

11. Overcrowding in government offices.

12. Overcrowding in schools.

13. Decrease in funds available for entitlements.

14. Cultural erosion.

15. Overuse of scarce resources (oil, gasoline, fresh water, jobs, electricity, food, etc)

16. Introduction of foreign diseases.

17. Influx of terrorists.
 
Nonsense. Immigration is HORRIBLE for America. And it's been that way for a very long time. I remember teaching a college Geography class in 1975, that even then it was unacceptable.

Actually, the US passed its population optimum (relative to resource base) level in 1860, when we had 30 Million (about same as Canada now) If we had been smart enough to have an immigration POINT SYSTEM like Canada, instead of the ludicrous CHAIN MIGRATION we have, allowing people to pour in here, for decades, we might not not have been importing oil (from Canada) for so many years. Like them, we could have been EXporting it, and making lots of money, and we might not have the high debt level we have.

That's just one example/ here's the overall scope, in case you missed it the first time >>

Harms of Immigration

1. Americans lose jobs. (especially Whites due to affirmative action).

2. Wage reduction.

3. Tax $ lost (due to off books work + lower wages paid).

4. Remittance $$$ lost. ($123 Billion/year).

5. Tax $$ lost to immigrants on welfare.

6. Increased crime.

7. Increased traffic congestion.

8. Increased pollution.

9. Overcrowding in hospital ERs.

10. Overcrowding in recreational facilities.

11. Overcrowding in government offices.

12. Overcrowding in schools.

13. Decrease in funds available for entitlements.

14. Cultural erosion.

15. Overuse of scarce resources (oil, gasoline, fresh water, jobs, electricity, food, etc)

16. Introduction of foreign diseases.

17. Influx of terrorists.

Those are the problems that result from big government, not (properly run) immigration. I don't know where your folks came from or when but unless you are Native American your ancestors immigrated here at some point. Mine never took a dime of welfare and their progeny have produced tens of millions in wealth creation. We're no where near over crowded. Still one of the least density developed countries on the planet. And the whole forced population control position you are pushing smacks of Nazi era eugenics.
 
I remember you asking about the alt-right. Looks like you found it.
Whither Went the Wither?

Lizardtarians will inevitably establish a police state "to protect rugged individualists from mob rule." They come from the same class and will produce the same outcome as the Bolsheviks. Lenin also promised the "withering away of the State."
 
Those are the problems that result from big government, not (properly run) immigration. I don't know where your folks came from or when but unless you are Native American your ancestors immigrated here at some point. Mine never took a dime of welfare and their progeny have produced tens of millions in wealth creation. We're no where near over crowded. Still one of the least density developed countries on the planet. And the whole forced population control position you are pushing smacks of Nazi era eugenics.
Perpetual Genocide by Nomadic Neanderthals

How can you say that entering uninhabited territory is not immigration in order to let the Indians off the hook? Besides, very soon after the first tribes entered, other Siberian tribes came and either exterminated them or drove them south and east.
 
Those are the problems that result from big government, not (properly run) immigration. I don't know where your folks came from or when but unless you are Native American your ancestors immigrated here at some point. Mine never took a dime of welfare and their progeny have produced tens of millions in wealth creation. We're no where near over crowded. Still one of the least density developed countries on the planet. And the whole forced population control position you are pushing smacks of Nazi era eugenics.
No, those are the problems of too many people relative to what your resource base can afford. 8 Million jobs taken away from Americans (many of them unemployed and you call problem of "big government". It was a problem over 100 years ago when the govt was much smaller.

It has nothing to do with big govt. You only have so much FRESH WATER within a nation's borders. So what do you want to do. Start depending on other countries to send you water ?... because you overloaded you population. Kids in the 5th grade can figure this one out.

And diseases abd additional crime being brought in, comes from immigration - THAT WE DON'T NEED.

There's only 2 scenarios when immigration would be beneficial >>

1. Entepreneurs bring in large amounts of capital to open businesses, and create jobs FOR AMERICANS.

2. Immigrants bringing highly special SKILLS that we need or covet (ex. great violinist, great research scientist, etc)

These are the ones that Trump is talking about letting back in, but only them. And they are ARE, possibly less than 1% of all illegal aliens.
 
Whither Went the Wither?

Lizardtarians will inevitably establish a police state "to protect rugged individualists from mob rule." They come from the same class and will produce the same outcome as the Bolsheviks. Lenin also promised the "withering away of the State."
Yes, he did - in his most major writing, "the State & Revolution"
 
Back
Top