New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

I think it is this simple...

Lukey

Lukey

Senator
Lukey said:
When your policies create more new people collecting disability:

Thus, so far in Obama’s term, the number of workers collecting disability has increased by 1,334,095.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/8803335-another-new-record-disability-975-day-under-obama
Click to expand...

Want some oats with that straw

Than they do new jobs:

In other words, 125,000 jobs have been created, in total, during Obama's first term...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/27/data-job-growth-obama_n_1919533.html

I don't think you deserve re-election. Period!
Click to expand...

Hmm so then you believe Obama is a magician. That coming into office with an economy shedding 0.75% of the workforce per month and losing 0.66% of GDP per month

that he would instantaneously turn it around?



Or else is it that 12.7% increase in GDP growth rate and a 950,000 jobs per month INCREASE in the jjobs rate is a bad number?

Because that's what we had the last time Obama policies were in effect


Mind you, that ended in Q1 2011.


So if you want to go on the track record of policies... given that
l
  • The current Tax policy is the GOPs
  • The current spending policies are the GOPs
  • The current military budget is the GOPs
  • The current military force complement is the GOPs


The how is it that the GOP deserves to have the WH or even the House of Representatives?
 
based on the very evident brain damage you suffer from, had you thought about applying for disability?

Before you go, would you mind telling everyone which of Obama's policies created the increase in applications for disability?
 
degsme said:
Want some oats with that straw



Hmm so then you believe Obama is a magician. That coming into office with an economy shedding 0.75% of the workforce per month and losing 0.66% of GDP per month

that he would instantaneously turn it around?



Or else is it that 12.7% increase in GDP growth rate and a 950,000 jobs per month INCREASE in the jjobs rate is a bad number?

Because that's what we had the last time Obama policies were in effect


Mind you, that ended in Q1 2011.


So if you want to go on the track record of policies... given that
l
  • The current Tax policy is the GOPs
  • The current spending policies are the GOPs
  • The current military budget is the GOPs
  • The current military force complement is the GOPs


The how is it that the GOP deserves to have the WH or even the House of Representatives?
Click to expand...

I agree with you - Obama has just continued Bush's bad big government, war mongering, economy killing policies. Lets give someone else a chance, mmkay?
 
degsme said:
Hmm so then you believe Obama is a magician. That coming into office with an economy shedding 0.75% of the workforce per month and losing 0.66% of GDP per month

that he would instantaneously turn it around?
Click to expand...

Lukey has been nothing if not persistent in insisting that Obama should have used his 'magic wand' to restore America to the economic Nirvana that we all know existed before he took office.
 
Obamacare requires all businesses with 50 or more full-time employees to provide health coverage for their workers or pay a $2,000 penalty for each employee after the first 30 workers.The employer mandate creates incentives for businesses to avoid higher costs by, for example, hiring part-time employees instead of full-time employees, since businesses will not be penalized for failing to provide health insurance to part-time employees.
Click to expand...

They got that covered Lukey....the new O-Care definition of a "full time" worker is 30 hours a week.
 
As is typical with you, you post a link to a winger site that has no mention whatsoever of the assertion you're supposedly supporting with it.
 
It's not "new", has nothing to do with "O-care" and it's not been redefined by Obama. It's defined by individual employers....by law. Other than that, your post is accurate. Oh, wait. There wasn't any "other than that".

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) does not define full-time employment or part-time employment. This is a matter generally to be determined by the employer. Whether an employee is considered full-time or part-time does not change the application of the FLSA, nor does it affect application of the Service Contract Act or Davis-Bacon and Related Acts wage and fringe benefit requirements.

http://www.dol.gov/dol/topic/workhours/full-time.htm#lawregs
 
I'm guessing Lukey thinks no one will click his links....just take it for granted that it had something to do with his post. The righties do exactly that. I don't.
 
ObamaCare Section 1513

(4) Full-time employee

(A) In general

The term “full-time employee” means, with respect to any month, an employee who is employed on average at least 30 hours of service per week.
 
So you have no evidence of a policy in the Obama administration that contributes to any increase in disability applications.
 
Lukey said:
I agree with you - Obama has just continued Bush's bad big government, war mongering, economy killing policies. Lets give someone else a chance, mmkay?
Click to expand...

No Obama's stimulus grew the economy at 12.9% GDP increase year on year. Then REPUBLICANS ENDED THAT GROWTH.

and Romney is arguing that we AMPLIFY GWB's policies... the same policies of tax cuts that gave us 22% Below average GDP growth for over 5 years.

Explain the diffeence between Romney's proposals and GWBs

Remember GWB also "promised" spending cuts.... and Romney has recently been listing all the things he will NOT cut: Department of Ed., Department of Energy, NASA.. etc.

So what IS he going to cut?
 
degsme said:
No Obama's stimulus grew the economy at 12.9% GDP increase year on year. Then REPUBLICANS ENDED THAT GROWTH.

and Romney is arguing that we AMPLIFY GWB's policies... the same policies of tax cuts that gave us 22% Below average GDP growth for over 5 years.

Explain the diffeence between Romney's proposals and GWBs

Remember GWB also "promised" spending cuts.... and Romney has recently been listing all the things he will NOT cut: Department of Ed., Department of Energy, NASA.. etc.

So what IS he going to cut?
Click to expand...

That was a simple (and normal) bounce back from over reaction to the credit crisis induced stack market crash. Growth has declined every year since Obama was elected.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top