New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

If this is even partly true..

Raoul_Luke

"Wait, it's all Marxism?" "Always has been."
A report in Newsweek citing U.S. intelligence officials has claimed that one of the main purposes of the FBI’s raid on Mar-a-Lago was to find documents that President Trump had collected and intended to use as proof to put to bed once and for all the Russian collusion conspiracy theory.


A) It explains why the discredited "Crossfire Hurricane" unit was the one doing the raid, and;

B) This is going to backfire spectacularly in their faces.

Even those of us who don't particularly care for Trump will not stand for authoritarian political oppression by the left wing Deep State Stasi operating within the DOJ.
 
A report in Newsweek citing U.S. intelligence officials has claimed that one of the main purposes of the FBI’s raid on Mar-a-Lago was to find documents that President Trump had collected and intended to use as proof to put to bed once and for all the Russian collusion conspiracy theory.


A) It explains why the discredited "Crossfire Hurricane" unit was the one doing the raid, and;

B) This is going to backfire spectacularly in their faces.

Even those of us who don't particularly care for Trump will not stand for authoritarian political oppression by the left wing Deep State Stasi operating within the DOJ.

DING DING DING!!! - KOOK site sighting zerohedge.com

"If this is even partly true.." - HAHAHAHAHA
 
You know who goes around laughing at their own idiotic statements? The village idiot, that's who.
In a normal discussion forum, this formulaic harassment-in-lieu-of substantive content would be disallowed - and that’s a FACT. In PJ, however, if you link an actual published story sans your OWN commentary content on it - THAT is a rules violation and it will be deleted. But this idiotic boilerplate “kook source” crap without substantive content? A-ok. It’s all over this forum - dozens and dozens of instances.

It’s like this is what they WANT…and…you get what you tolerate.
 
In a normal discussion forum, this formulaic harassment-in-lieu-of substantive content would be disallowed - and that’s a FACT. In PJ, however, if you link an actual published story sans your OWN commentary content on it - THAT is a rules violation and it will be deleted. But this idiotic boilerplate “kook source” crap without substantive content? A-ok. It’s all over this forum - dozens and dozens of instances.

It’s like this is what they WANT…and…you get what you tolerate.

Actually it's a g*ddamn shame that people use these kinds of kook sites and pretend that they publish actual news. The ridicule is all that stories from sources like these deserve. It pisses you off because I won't waste my time debunking them. Too bad.

If you want substantive discussion then post something real. But face it Rick - you don't.
 
Actually it's a g*ddamn shame that people use these kinds of kook sites and pretend that they publish actual news. The ridicule is all that stories from sources like these deserve. It pisses you off because I won't waste my time debunking them. Too bad.

If you want substantive discussion then post something real. But face it Rick - you don't.
Raw Story sez “Hi”, hack.. Now…back to your idiotic canned, cut-and-paste trash. Just make sure you offer not a SYLLABLE of substantive address to the OP subject.
 
Last edited:
Actually it's a g*ddamn shame that people use these kinds of kook sites and pretend that they publish actual news. The ridicule is all that stories from sources like these deserve. It pisses you off because I won't waste my time debunking them. Too bad.

If you want substantive discussion then post something real. But face it Rick - you don't.

LOL! After the past half decade, when the mainstream news outlets published copious fake news like it was gospel, the idea that you can pretend that isn't so, and that these "kook" sites (as you call them) regularly published the counter-narratives that all turned out to be true, simply renders you, well, the only "kook" in this thread.
 
LOL! After the past half decade, when the mainstream news outlets published copious fake news like it was gospel, the idea that you can pretend that isn't so, and that these "kook" sites (as you call them) regularly published the counter-narratives that all turned out to be true, simply renders you, well, the only "kook" in this thread.

If it weren't for the KOOK sites on my list the Yabbas Dabbas like yourself wouldn't have anything to link to.

I'm pretty sure that I've made this offer to you before but in case I have not I'll make it now:

How would you like to curate a list of LEFT wing Kook sites? Since none of you righties actually have the brains to create one on your own I've already done the heavy lifting for you. You can see it here - http://pnwest.rf.gd/yabbadabba.html

I'll even set up a FREE web host that you can keep it at. All you'll need to do is add LEFT wing kook sites and change the text. Just think - YOU too could belittle all of the lefties that post from the sites you find. Wouldn't that be grand.

So far I've made this offer to many of you righties but none of you has the courage to take me up on the offer.

Are you up to the task?
 
In a normal discussion forum, this formulaic harassment-in-lieu-of substantive content would be disallowed - and that’s a FACT. In PJ, however, if you link an actual published story sans your OWN commentary content on it - THAT is a rules violation and it will be deleted. But this idiotic boilerplate “kook source” crap without substantive content? A-ok. It’s all over this forum - dozens and dozens of instances.

It’s like this is what they WANT…and…you get what you tolerate.

Can you PLEASE stop that pathetic, boring whining. Act like a man.

Sheesh.
 
A report in Newsweek citing U.S. intelligence officials has claimed that one of the main purposes of the FBI’s raid on Mar-a-Lago was to find documents that President Trump had collected and intended to use as proof to put to bed once and for all the Russian collusion conspiracy theory.


A) It explains why the discredited "Crossfire Hurricane" unit was the one doing the raid, and;

B) This is going to backfire spectacularly in their faces.

Even those of us who don't particularly care for Trump will not stand for authoritarian political oppression by the left wing Deep State Stasi operating within the DOJ.

Preposterous for two reasons…

1. Patriotic Americans have no problem with the FBI investigating a foreign government’s interference in our elections, along with any Americans who may be involved, and

2. If Trump had any such evidence he would have released it immediately. There is no such evidence. Trump was limited through his stooge Barr to appointing that buffoon Durham, who has drilled one dry hole after another.

Give it a rest.
 
If it weren't for the KOOK sites on my list the Yabbas Dabbas like yourself wouldn't have anything to link to.

I'm pretty sure that I've made this offer to you before but in case I have not I'll make it now:

How would you like to curate a list of LEFT wing Kook sites? Since none of you righties actually have the brains to create one on your own I've already done the heavy lifting for you. You can see it here - http://pnwest.rf.gd/yabbadabba.html

I'll even set up a FREE web host that you can keep it at. All you'll need to do is add LEFT wing kook sites and change the text. Just think - YOU too could belittle all of the lefties that post from the sites you find. Wouldn't that be grand.

So far I've made this offer to many of you righties but none of you has the courage to take me up on the offer.

Are you up to the task?

Frankly, that's beneath me. I prefer to debate information, not cartoonist screed.
 
In a normal discussion forum, this formulaic harassment-in-lieu-of substantive content would be disallowed - and that’s a FACT. In PJ, however, if you link an actual published story sans your OWN commentary content on it - THAT is a rules violation and it will be deleted. But this idiotic boilerplate “kook source” crap without substantive content? A-ok. It’s all over this forum - dozens and dozens of instances.

It’s like this is what they WANT…and…you get what you tolerate.
Wait. YOU are complaining about “formulaic harassment in lieu of substantive content”? LMAO!
 
In a normal discussion forum, this formulaic harassment-in-lieu-of substantive content would be disallowed - and that’s a FACT. In PJ, however, if you link an actual published story sans your OWN commentary content on it - THAT is a rules violation and it will be deleted. But this idiotic boilerplate “kook source” crap without substantive content? A-ok. It’s all over this forum - dozens and dozens of instances.

It’s like this is what they WANT…and…you get what you tolerate.

Well, when you don't have the mental capacity to address the content, you attack the source.
 
He's laughing at your idiotic source....

These shortbussers hate it when you don't engage with their screwy "news" sources. I just belittle them every single time. Never respond to any of the crap that comes from these garbage sites.
 
A report in Newsweek citing U.S. intelligence officials has claimed that one of the main purposes of the FBI’s raid on Mar-a-Lago was to find documents that President Trump had collected and intended to use as proof to put to bed once and for all the Russian collusion conspiracy theory.


A) It explains why the discredited "Crossfire Hurricane" unit was the one doing the raid, and;

B) This is going to backfire spectacularly in their faces.

Even those of us who don't particularly care for Trump will not stand for authoritarian political oppression by the left wing Deep State Stasi operating within the DOJ.

The usual crap from Tyler Durden. It claims a report by Newsweek...but doesn't link to the article.
 
These shortbussers hate it when you don't engage with their screwy "news" sources. I just belittle them every single time. Never respond to any of the crap that comes from these garbage sites.

Since you obviously don't have the ammunition necessary to actually address the subject, What you think of us "shortbussers" is really irrelevant.
 
Back
Top