Raoul_Luke
"Wait, it's all Marxism?" "Always has been."
He is laughing at your idiotic statement...
In your (idiotic) opinion.
He is laughing at your idiotic statement...
I think it sad that you need to discredit the FBI to avoid actually addressing Trump's theft of 42 boxes of documents from the White House.
Yet again..you are making shit up.I think it's sad that you think the government is as pure as the driven snow.
INVALIDATION is hard-wired into liberals. Ho hum. Yawn****Actually it's a g*ddamn shame that people use these kinds of kook sites and pretend that they publish actual news. The ridicule is all that stories from sources like these deserve. It pisses you off because I won't waste my time debunking them. Too bad.
If you want substantive discussion then post something real. But face it Rick - you don't.
I think it's sad that you think the government is as pure as the driven snow.
I think it sad that you need to discredit the FBI to avoid actually addressing Trump's theft of 42 boxes of documents from the White House.
Since I never posted anything like what @Raoul_Luke claimed...i find it amusing that you come along to agree with him.I love when they make statements that are supposed to be factual but are actually based on speculation or outright lies.
You have no evidence of the "theft of 42 boxes of documents", yet you keep repeating it as if it has been established.
As for discrediting the FBI, they have done that on thier own:
![]()
Think The FBI Deserves The Benefit Of The Doubt? Think Again
Can the FBI be trusted? A Federalist analysis of agency lies over the last decade is an unequivocal no.thefederalist.com
Newsweek? a kook site? Wow...DING DING DING!!! - KOOK site sighting zerohedge.com
"If this is even partly true.." - HAHAHAHAHA
Which court of law has said they were stolen and or illegally removed?Since I never posted anything like what @Raoul_Luke claimed...i find it amusing that you come along to agree with him.
As far as needing proof that Trump stole those documents...they were removed from the White House...and illegally at that. What more proof do I need to call them stolen?
Which court of law has said they were stolen and or illegally removed?
Shows what you know. The court said no such thing. Show me where the court said he stole the documents.The one that granted a warrant to retrieve them.
Since I never posted anything like what @Raoul_Luke claimed...i find it amusing that you come along to agree with him.
As far as needing proof that Trump stole those documents...they were removed from the White House...and illegally at that. What more proof do I need to call them stolen?
Which court of law has said they were stolen and or illegally removed?
His TV. His TV told him and that makes everything ok, no need to ask questions.
Removed illegally? Like Michael Cohen's phone being pinged in Praque? Or the Hookers peeing on the bed? Russian bounties on American Soldiers in Afghanistan, or the plot to kidnap the Governor of MI?.....Or.. well hell, Putin put Trump in the White House........
How many times do they have to LIE to you before you stop believing them.
I am sure, this time, this time they are telling us the truth, I mean they just have to be, right?
His TV. His TV told him and that makes everything ok, no need to ask questions.