New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Musing a little

Boca

Governor
Given there is no logical reason for restricting so called assault weapons for law abiding citizens, when non-law abiders (criminals, gangs, imbedded drug cartels, and probably terrorist sleeper cells) would ignore and laugh at the advantage they gain, why in hell would our COOTUS and AG be hell bent on doing just that, even as COOTUS and the AG engaged in supplying said weapons, with a reasonable expectation they would end up in the hands of those very groups?

If there were some way to prevent the mentally ill from access to such weapons, that's a no-brainer. Do it now! But why disarm the vast majority of responsible, law abiding, citizens?

Seems to be but one answer. And in the context of the historical record as well as Fast & Furious it's been exposed.
 
Let's see............the AG is supplying arms of the semi-automatic variety to criminals
The POTUS is taking guns of the semi-automatic variety away from law-abiding citizens.
It's pretty obvious whose side they are on.
A no-brainer.
 
Given there is no logical reason for restricting so called assault weapons for law abiding citizens, when non-law abiders (criminals, gangs, imbedded drug cartels, and probably terrorist sleeper cells) would ignore and laugh at the advantage they gain, why in hell would our COOTUS and AG be hell bent on doing just that, even as COOTUS and the AG engaged in supplying said weapons, with a reasonable expectation they would end up in the hands of those very groups?

If there were some way to prevent the mentally ill from access to such weapons, that's a no-brainer. Do it now! But why disarm the vast majority of responsible, law abiding, citizens?

Seems to be but one answer. And in the context of the historical record as well as Fast & Furious it's been exposed.

So you are saying you and your other nut cases in the republican party should not be able to be armed?
 
Let's see............the AG is supplying arms of the semi-automatic variety to criminals
The POTUS is taking guns of the semi-automatic variety away from law-abiding citizens.
It's pretty obvious whose side they are on.
A no-brainer.

yes I can see how one who thinks that this is the way things are being done would be considered one who is without a working brain.
 
Righties blame Obama and those who want "gun control" for THEM BUYING MORE GUNS!

Like they have NO free will! Like they were FORCED to buy more guns!

Righties refuse to accept responsibilities
 
Given there is no logical reason for restricting so called assault weapons for law abiding citizens

Given that you begin with the stupidest false premise imaginable.....I must ask what is the "logical reason" for "law abiding citizens" to stockpile high volume, semi-automatic weapons.

Why not just get a Teddy Bear and a security blanket? They work just as well against the boogeyman.
 
Yo

brainchild....pay attention!

While I have no logical reason for purchasing a semi-automatic rifle, thousands of other law abiding citizens apparently do. Hint; everytime someone in government starts talking about banning them sales spike. Figure that out for yourself if you can.

Moreover, people become suspicious when government and the media fail to come clean with the facts. What are they hiding from us? Why?, doesn't engender a lot of public trust in government
It's only human nature.

As an example....I bet you didn't know that the Newtown shooter only had 4 handguns...not an AR 15 or some other spooky looking whatever. Those that do know become naturally suspicious of the motive for going after military style assault rifles.

Is that too hard to understand?
 
I remember 4 years all the Right Wing Ding Bats claiming "Obama was forming a secret army"......Fvckin Babbling morons
 
Yeah...I know, there are many voices in his head.

It's a crack thing. You'd think one of those voices would have whispered the right year for him when he was signing the guest register at Westminster Abbey?

They say that shit makes you feel invincible. I gotta believe it after Bill Clinton's liitle war in Waco that killed 68 men women and children.

The irony of ironies is that started over the suspicion of illegal weapons in the Branch Davidian compound. It's like God is trying to tell us stuff but we won't listen.
 
Yeah...I know, there are many voices in his head.

It's a crack thing. You'd think one of those voices would have whispered the right year for him when he was signing the guest register at Westminster Abbey?

They say that shit makes you feel invincible. I gotta believe it after Bill Clinton's liitle war in Waco that killed 68 men women and children.

The irony of ironies is that started over the suspicion of illegal weapons in the Branch Davidian compound. It's like God is trying to tell us stuff but we won't listen.

Wow this coming from a member of a party that killed 50,000 iraqis and got 4500 americans killed because they made up a story about Saddam has WMD and they knew where they were. You are one funny man Boca.
You do understand that they has people who were members in waco but left that said they did, and after the fire they found 60 rifles and 400,000 rounds of Amo.
 
Right wing dings ONLY seem to hate or fear the GOV when a BUSH or REPUBLICAN is NOT in the White House.

Some weird kinda' coincidence thing.

Others would call it hypocritical and blind blatant partisanship.
 
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
 
Back
Top