New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Phone Call Transcript Released!!!

  • Thread starter Deleted member 21794
  • Start date
ObamacareForever said:
Asking him to interfere in American Politics crosses the line.
Click to expand...

"interfere"?

Loaded language there.

I thought finding out crimes was a good thing. However, I guess when it's against Democrats, it's suddenly "interfering" in things.

I guess info outside of the USA doesn't count? and it's not fair? That's what we learned from the DNC hack.

And this coming from someone who supports an investigation based on a Russian Steele Dossier? LMAO
 
Addy said:
At the moment I have not heard any of the other experts speak re: impeachment w/o quid pro quo.
Click to expand...
The smart ones know there's nothing to run with, the crazy ones are running around like chicken little screaming the sky is falling.
 
Mr. Friscus said:
"interfere"?

Loaded language there.

I thought finding out crimes was a good thing. However, I guess when it's against Democrats, it's suddenly "interfering" in things.

I guess info outside of the USA doesn't count? and it's not fair? That's what we learned from the DNC hack.
Click to expand...

Using his logic, anyone running for office is immune from legal scrutiny. Well, if they're a Democrat, of course.
 
The Thinker said:
Using his logic, anyone running for office is immune from legal scrutiny. Well, if they're a DemocRAT, of course.
Click to expand...

and again, the investigation into collusion was based on a paid for Russian Steele Dossier..

That's foreign.. interference?

Suddenly it's not so evil I guess.
 
Mr. Friscus said:
"interfere"?

Loaded language there.

I thought finding out crimes was a good thing. However, I guess when it's against Democrats, it's suddenly "interfering" in things.
Click to expand...
here were no crimes, no indication of crimes, no nothing. The only reason for Trump to solicit an investigation was politics.
Mr. Friscus said:
I guess info outside of the USA doesn't count? and it's not fair? That's what we learned from the DNC hack.
Click to expand...
soliciting foreign interference into American politics= collusion.
 
Mr. Friscus said:
and again, the investigation into collusion was based on a paid for Russian Steele Dossier..

That's foreign.. interference?

Suddenly it's not so evil I guess.
Click to expand...
There is a distinction. It's not illegal to employ foreigners in a campaign, but it is illegal to accept donations from foreigners.
 
The Thinker said:
OK, now for some fun. Check out what one headline said happened during the phone call:

WSJ exclusive: Trump told Ukrainian president “about eight times” in phone call to reopen Biden investigation

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Click to expand...

Oh my....

Poor TDS Democrats messed themselves once again.
 
Bernard_Fokke said:
The smart ones know there's nothing to run with, the crazy ones are running around like chicken little screaming the sky is falling.
Click to expand...

The smart ones can read between the lines and clearly see -- Trump was asking for tit for tat in his phone call to Zelensky.
 
ObamacareForever said:
Neither of the Bidens did anything wrong so the only reason to investigate them is politics.
Click to expand...

The Ukrainians have felt otherwise, and have had evidence of US corruption all lined up for us since at least 2018. Too bad, so sorry!
 
Poor Adam Schiff. Doing conference now comparing Trump call to mafia shakedown.

He needs to watch the Biden tape again and rethink who he applies that description to.
 
Pogue Mahone said:
Trump did ask the Ukrainian leader to look in to the issue with Biden's son but there was no quid pro quo. I think that will be enough for the dems to continue screaming and yelling about the issue though. Remember the rule is if Trump did it, it's illegal.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/25/tru...ook-into-biden-and-his-son-in-phone-call.html
Click to expand...
A documented qui quo pro isn't needed.
1. Trump illegally solicited help from the Russians in the 2016 election.
2. Trump now caught illegally soliciting help from Ukraine for the 2020 election.
 
JuliefromOhio said:
A documented qui quo pro isn't needed.
1. Trump illegally solicited help from the Russians in the 2016 election.
2. Trump now caught illegally soliciting help from Ukraine for the 2020 election.
Click to expand...

Julie sweetheart, please educate yourself. The Ukrainians have been trying to give us evidence of US corruption since at least 2018. Here are some of the FACTS you'll have to deal with.

  • Sworn statements from two Ukrainian officials admitting that their agency tried to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election in favor of Hillary Clinton. The effort included leaking an alleged ledger showing payments to then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort;

  • Contacts between Democratic figures in Washington and Ukrainian officials that involved passing along dirt on Donald Trump;

  • Financial records showing a Ukrainian natural gas company routed more than $3 million to American accounts tied to Hunter Biden, younger son of then-Vice President Joe Biden, who managed U.S.-Ukraine relations for the Obama administration. Biden’s son served on the board of a Ukrainian natural gas company, Burisma Holdings;

  • Records that Vice President Biden pressured Ukrainian officials in March 2016 to fire the prosecutor who oversaw an investigation of Burisma Holdings and who planned to interview Hunter Biden about the financial transfers;

  • Correspondence showing members of the State Department and U.S. Embassy in Kiev interfered or applied pressure in criminal cases on Ukrainian soil;

  • Disbursements of as much as $7 billion in Ukrainian funds that prosecutors believe may have been misappropriated or taken out of the country, including to the United States.

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...s-why-dont-you-want-our-evidence-on-democrats
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top