New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Phone Call Transcript Released!!!

  • Thread starter Deleted member 21794
  • Start date
I'm just shocked there is a verdict already from the Trumpsters.... oh, wait.

As opposed to Democrats, who had the verdict come in even before the transcript was released. Seriously bro?
 
This is what we got:

"MEMORANDUM OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION"

with this disclaimer:

"CAUTION:  Memorandum of a Telephone Convrsaton. · (TELCN)  not a verbatm transcript of adscussn The text n ths document records te ntes and ecollectons of Stuaton Room DutyOffers and-NSC polcy staff assned t_ lstenand mmoralze the conersaton n wrtten formas the cnvrsaton takes place A nume of fators can affect 'th accuracy of th reco�d,ncludng poor telecommunatons connectons and varatons n acent an/or ntepretatone ord "naudle s used to ndate portons o a onversaton that the noetaer wa naleto hear"
 
This is what we got:

"MEMORANDUM OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION"

with this disclaimer:

"CAUTION:  Memorandum of a Telephone Convrsaton. · (TELCN)  not a verbatm transcript of adscussn The text n ths document records te ntes and ecollectons of Stuaton Room DutyOffers and-NSC polcy staff assned t_ lstenand mmoralze the conersaton n wrtten formas the cnvrsaton takes place A nume of fators can affect 'th accuracy of th reco�d,ncludng poor telecommunatons connectons and varatons n acent an/or ntepretatone ord "naudle s used to ndate portons o a onversaton that the noetaer wa naleto hear"

That stood out at me. I don't see any substantive corrections coming out of that. Do you?
 
He needs to watch the Biden tape again and rethink who he applies that description to.

You should call your Senator or any republican Senator and ask them why they aren't doing an investigation of Biden. And how is the DOJ probe coming calling out the Russia gate posers... all I hear is, *cricket's*
 
This is what we got:

"MEMORANDUM OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION"

with this disclaimer:

"CAUTION:  Memorandum of a Telephone Convrsaton. · (TELCN)  not a verbatm transcript of adscussn The text n ths document records te ntes and ecollectons of Stuaton Room DutyOffers and-NSC polcy staff assned t_ lstenand mmoralze the conersaton n wrtten formas the cnvrsaton takes place A nume of fators can affect 'th accuracy of th reco�d,ncludng poor telecommunatons connectons and varatons n acent an/or ntepretatone ord "naudle s used to ndate portons o a onversaton that the noetaer wa naleto hear"

People I heard said there really were no transcripts like there usually are. It is someone listening and taking something like shorthand. It''s not like there is no info there it is just only readable by Trumpsters.
 
You should call your Senator or any republican Senator and ask them why they aren't doing an investigation of Biden. And how is the DOJ probe coming calling out the Russia gate posers... all I hear is, *cricket's*

Oh that's coming. The Ukrainians have been offering us evidence of US corruption since at least 2018. And it's not good news for DemocRATS.
 
People I heard said there really were no transcripts like there usually are. It is someone listening and taking something like shorthand. It''s not like there is no info there it is just only readable by Trumpsters.

Actually, that kinda caught me by surprise as well. I would think every call would be recorded.
 
That stood out at me. I don't see any substantive corrections coming out of that. Do you?
Trump said this in a tweet yesterday:

"I am currently at the United Nations representing our Country, but have authorized the release tomorrow of the complete, fully declassified and unredacted transcript of my phone conversation with President Zelensky of Ukraine...."

What was released today is not a transcript.
 
here were no crimes, no indication of crimes, no nothing. The only reason for Trump to solicit an investigation was politics.
There's certainly a conflict of interest in Biden's case. That's not in dispute. Whether it's worthwhile of an investigation could be up to dispute, but nobody can say there's absolutely nothing.
soliciting foreign interference into American politics= collusion.

Then why was the Russian Steele Dossier fine and dandy?
 
Trump said this in a tweet yesterday:

"I am currently at the United Nations representing our Country, but have authorized the release tomorrow of the complete, fully declassified and unredacted transcript of my phone conversation with President Zelensky of Ukraine...."

What was released today is not a transcript.
I was watching a lady on TV who used to be present during these types of calls when W was Prez.

She said standard procedure is to have 4-5 people listening and writing down what was said, then they compare notes and come up with a transcript.

Of course, you will see something wrong with this.
 
Trump did ask the Ukrainian leader to look in to the issue with Biden's son but there was no quid pro quo. I think that will be enough for the dems to continue screaming and yelling about the issue though. Remember the rule is if Trump did it, it's illegal.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/25/tru...ook-into-biden-and-his-son-in-phone-call.html
Of course the Democrats will leap on that mention of Biden's son.

However, notice how no matter what the illegal activities of the Bidens were........they are okay as far as Democrats are concerned.
 
Bring it, the suspense is killing me and I'm not getting any younger.

Hey man you're alright. Look, I think Trump has an escape hatch here. It turns out the Ukrainians have been trying to give us evidence of US corruption since at least 2018, to include:
  • Sworn statements from two Ukrainian officials admitting that their agency tried to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election in favor of Hillary Clinton. The effort included leaking an alleged ledger showing payments to then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort;

  • Contacts between Democratic figures in Washington and Ukrainian officials that involved passing along dirt on Donald Trump;

  • Financial records showing a Ukrainian natural gas company routed more than $3 million to American accounts tied to Hunter Biden, younger son of then-Vice President Joe Biden, who managed U.S.-Ukraine relations for the Obama administration. Biden’s son served on the board of a Ukrainian natural gas company, Burisma Holdings;

  • Records that Vice President Biden pressured Ukrainian officials in March 2016 to fire the prosecutor who oversaw an investigation of Burisma Holdings and who planned to interview Hunter Biden about the financial transfers;

  • Correspondence showing members of the State Department and U.S. Embassy in Kiev interfered or applied pressure in criminal cases on Ukrainian soil;

  • Disbursements of as much as $7 billion in Ukrainian funds that prosecutors believe may have been misappropriated or taken out of the country, including to the United States.
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...s-why-dont-you-want-our-evidence-on-democrats
 
I was watching a lady on TV who used to be present during these types of calls when W was Prez.

She said standard procedure is to have 4-5 people listening and writing down what was said, then they compare notes and come up with a transcript.

Of course, you will see something wrong with this.
If they're listening then it can be transcribed simultaneously just as court reporters do. That's why they are called "transcripts". Of course,you know that.
 
Back
Top