D
Deleted member 21794
Guest
The reasoning behind it is that foreign leaders would not be candid if they knew calls were being recorded.
Duh I can't believe I didn't think of that. Thanks!
The reasoning behind it is that foreign leaders would not be candid if they knew calls were being recorded.
Exactly what I said.If they're listening then it can be transcribed simultaneously just as court reporters do.
If they're listening then it can be transcribed simultaneously just as court reporters do.
Gives them the ability to deny something was said......at least to the home crowd.Duh I can't believe I didn't think of that. Thanks!
Trump said this in a tweet yesterday:
"I am currently at the United Nations representing our Country, but have authorized the release tomorrow of the complete, fully declassified and unredacted transcript of my phone conversation with President Zelensky of Ukraine...."
What was released today is not a transcript.
Duh I can't believe I didn't think of that. Thanks!
If this read is to be believed all digital messages/communications are stored and can be retrieved.
--------------------
Are all telephone calls recorded and accessible to the US government?
Glenn Greenwald
Let's repeat that last part: "no digital communication is secure", by which he means not that any communication is susceptible to government interception as it happens (although that is true), but far beyond that: all digital communications - meaning telephone calls, emails, online chats and the like - are automatically recorded and stored and accessible to the government after the fact. To describe that is to define what a ubiquitous, limitless Surveillance State is.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/may/04/telephone-calls-recorded-fbi-boston
I would think Pres. Trump knows what a "transcript" is. If you have a transcript,you don't need a " MEMORANDUM OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION" or a disclaimer.I wonder how they determine when a transcriber be present. Eh, I'm getting off into the weeds a bit. However, since we're talking about a transcriber being there, that cements my belief there's not much to be squeezed via the info in the disclaimer.
Trump did ask the Ukrainian leader to look in to the issue with Biden's son but there was no quid pro quo. I think that will be enough for the dems to continue screaming and yelling about the issue though. Remember the rule is if Trump did it, it's illegal.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/25/tru...ook-into-biden-and-his-son-in-phone-call.html
The experts are saying it doesn't have to be quid pro quo to be an impeachable offense.
Asking someone to find out about a criminal investigation is illegal? On what planet?
So asking for a favor is illegal. Under what statute?
Soliciting a foreign government to dig up dirt on a potential political opponent is impeachable.
Is "dig up dirt" a legal term?
There is no whistleblower.No,
Keeping a WBC from congress is illegal and impeachable.
There is no whistleblower.
No,
Keeping a WBC from congress is illegal and impeachable.
Trumps IG says there is
And right on cue, NO MATTER WHAT HE SAID, the BASE claps, cheers and defends him.
The big picture ( which you CAN'T CHANGE ) is the lamestream media has REPORTED this for 100's of millions of people who aren't in the base- they can connect the dots. Oh, and keep Rudy out there - he is the best at admitting guilt when he get's excited and his eyes bulge out. Think about the GOP wanted impeachment for Monica, The dems want impeachment from 6 different committees moving forward and have successfully soiled the Trump brand worldwide.
Again - how does this win him the election? He has fulfilled the evangelical demands of 2 court appointments, for the majority, so they have no need for him now - they can take the clothespin off their collective noses and move forward - stay home.
You honestly think, after all the exposed corruption, people will jump in line for him? He will get his 40% and lose, he will then call the military to surround the White House and tie the election results up in court claiming 25 million illegals voted - or whatever he loses by.
But hey keep up the faith, only 14 more months to expose him.... and 14 more months for you righties to defend him. You all knew, BEFORE, the transcript was released he was innocent - no matter what it said.