New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Phone Call Transcript Released!!!

  • Thread starter Deleted member 21794
  • Start date
YouCantHandleDaTruth said:
Depends of course,

If the Current AG's country is being potentially extorted for say ... something like defense weapons .... then no they don't get weight in.

Either way, current AG isn't claiming there's any "there there" either !!!

DAMN !!!

MAGA Cultist be like 'whatever man'
Click to expand...

Pssst... the weapons were already purchased, Einstein. Now can you point us to the extortion or not?

Here, let me give you an example of extortion.

A vice president tells another person he has to fire someone or else he won't get a billion dollars in loan guarantees. He tells the victim they have six hours to comply. The victim complies. The victim then gets the loan guarantees that the vice president was threatening to take away.

OK, now you give it a try.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Thinker said:
Here you go. I used a specific article just for you. The Trump administration approved the sale of the missiles, which has Russia pissed off.

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/b...s-javelin-missile-and-russia-isnt-happy-83016

Glad I could help educate you yet again, *Mensa*. LOL

Edit: And POOF! @YouCantHandleDaTruth disappears!! ROFLMAO!!!
Click to expand...

This does not prove what you implied that the weapons were already bought ... they weren't.

Also, it looks like the Trump admin help up the sell of the weapons until after the call.

Simply ... Trump solicited a foreign country to look up dirt on a potential political opponent.

Done
 
YouCantHandleDaTruth said:
This does not prove what you implied that the weapons were already bought ... they weren't.

Also, it looks like the Trump admin help up the sell of the weapons until after the call.

Simply ... Trump solicited a foreign country to look up dirt on a potential political opponent.

Done
Click to expand...

I knew you'd take the bait. Here you go. The sale was approved by the Trump administration WAAAAAY before the phone call. Documented FACT.

Now, let's proceed with bitch slapping you:

First, my favorite line that completely destroys you:

The US has delivered the Javelin anti-tank missile system to Ukraine, a State Department official confirmed to Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty on Monday.

"They have already been delivered," the official told RFE/RL.

https://www.businessinsider.com/this-the-antitank-missile-that-the-us-sending-ukraine-2017-8

And just to add insult to injury, here are some more links that leave you absolutely NOWHERE to hide:

https://news.yahoo.com/ukraine-tests-anti-tank-missiles-bought-us-171808365.html

https://www.businessinsider.com/this-the-antitank-missile-that-the-us-sending-ukraine-2017-8

Oh and by the way, I didn't "insinuate" anything. I flat out stated they bought the missiles. And they did.

But at least we can agree:

You are DONE.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
 
The Thinker said:
I knew you'd take the bait. Here you go. The sale was approved by the Trump administration WAAAAAY before the phone call. Documented FACT.

Now, let's proceed with bitch slapping you:

First, my favorite line that completely destroys you:

The US has delivered the Javelin anti-tank missile system to Ukraine, a State Department official confirmed to Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty on Monday.

"They have already been delivered," the official told RFE/RL....
Click to expand...

Ummmm, Mensa ...

That was last years Javilens not this years ... jus ... please quit walking out in public k?

thx
 
YouCantHandleDaTruth said:
Ummmm, Mensa ...

That was last years Javilens not this years ... jus ... please quit walking out in public k?

thx
Click to expand...

Show me where you stipulated dates, sweet cheeks.

Didn't think so. But hey, thanks for outing yourself as thinking Javelin missiles are like cars and new models come out every year.

And don't forget to breathe.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Thinker said:
I think the inability of PJ libs to cite something unlawful in the transcript speaks VOLUMES.

Where are all the usual loudmouths? Probably waiting for talking points, given they can't think for themselves.
Click to expand...

The illegal requests for help with an election demand and tying policy decisions to personal favors have been cited many times. You are just doing more of the same old gaslighting.
 
The Thinker said:
They got NOTHIN'. Asking someone to find about a suspected crime without asking for or even hinting at a desired outcome isn't a crime. OK, so I'm preaching to the choir maybe.

I do think it's funny Macron and Merkel got a dishonorable mention from both leaders. Oops!
Click to expand...

“There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that,” is Trump asking for a finding that Biden stopped the prosecution.
 
EatTheRich said:
“There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that,” is Trump asking for a finding that Biden stopped the prosecution.
Click to expand...

No. You're lying again.
 
The Thinker said:
So asking for a favor is illegal. Under what statute?
Click to expand...

Under the Constitution, Article 1, Section 9, among other relevant laws.

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.
 
The Thinker said:
Asking someone to find out about a criminal investigation is illegal? On what planet?
Click to expand...

Asking someone to look into a legitimate criminal concern on behalf of the country is one thing ... asking someone to affirm bogus charges against a political rival is something entirely different.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top