New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Proposal for JackCons

Bo-4

Bo-4

Senator
Forget about "individual mandate" being a child of The Heritage Foundation and Grassley, Newt, Mittens Howell lll and many other Rs.

Since you now support freeloaders, how about a truce?

Anyone who doesn't want to buy health insurance won't have to. But they WILL have to sign a waiver stating that they won't be eligible for any and all emergency room and subsequent care if they get in an horrible accident, have a heart attack, need an emergency appendectomy, come down with leukemia, etc.

Those of us individuals who pay our health insurance premiums month after month and year after year do not wish to see any more rate hikes to pay the estimate 75-100 billion per year it takes to cover them.

There will be only one exception.. those with money may post a $50,000 escrow bond but when/if their money runs out, they will be sent home to die with no further assistance.

House Republicans can write the bill immediately and the Senate will send it on through to President Obama.

Fair nuff?
 
No takers huh? Not even one??

At least someone could tell me why i should pay 20% increases every year due to the hospitals having to charge more to pay for more and more freeloaders.

It's a vicious cycle you know, the more those costs go up the fewer people can afford insurance.. so they TOO freeload.

Thanks in advance!
 
OK, if that is what it takes to make you happy let it be written....I've never figured out why someone in their 80/90s that don't know their name, or anyone elses, must wear diapers w/multi other health issues, are kept alive..........

MY living WILL makes it clear I do not wish to exist in that state of nothingness/uselessness.

dust to dust, ashes to ashes, just prop me up side the juke box and partay
 
Sounds good to me!

Of course, I would only ammend that by putting in an "available to pay" clause. In other words, people under a certain income level, will recieve "free" medical care, ALTHOUGH...with NO 'frills' (ie, no Viagra, Dick Enlargements, Breast enlargements, fertility treatments, cosmetic surgery, tummy tucks, face lifts, etc. Birth Control would be okay. And, we already have free abortions on demand, via Planned Parenthood...)
 
Doc said:
Sounds good to me!

Of course, I would only ammend that by putting in an "available to pay" clause. In other words, people under a certain income level, will recieve "free" medical care, ALTHOUGH...with NO 'frills' (ie, no Viagra, $#@! Enlargements, Breast enlargements, fertility treatments, cosmetic surgery, tummy tucks, face lifts, etc. Birth Control would be okay. And, we already have free abortions on demand, via Planned Parenthood...)
Click to expand...

Then it is settled.. we have a bipartisan bill Doc. Now tell SCOTUS they can wrap it up for the week, have Boehner and his pals write it up and send it along.

That was easy huh? ;-)
 
Those of us that pay our health insurance premiums and also pay federal taxes to the general fund month after month and year after year do not wish to see more an more people going on the medicaid dole either. I'm guessing that the over 50 million people on medicaid costs taxpayers more than the estimated $100 billion per year you complain about.

You can't ask for deal when it appears your gonna lose the game Bo...that's just not a very sportsman like attitude. :whip:
 
Bo-4 said:
Then it is settled.. we have a bipartisan bill Doc. Now tell SCOTUS they can wrap it up for the week, have Boehner and his pals write it up and send it along.

That was easy huh? ;-)
Click to expand...

Except that you and I likely do not have the authority of our local Dog Catchers......

Plus, IF you and I were to discuss this, and even THINK of compromise...well, we would need a few months of 3 six hour days, each, a nice salary, BETTER healthcare than the one we are discussion, provided by the same taxpayers whom we hope to foist this new bill upon, very nice retirement benefits, and, a few cocktail parties...you know, to start "hammering things out..."

Do you play Golf? I do not, but, if we are to "represent the people," I suppose I had better learn, as apparently Golf Courses, Cocktail lounges, and State Dinners are where the Aristocracy seems to do most of their "representing."

Oh, and the Campaign Trail, of course...which is their Primary Job and Duty
 
What makes you think those things are covered. MAYBE viagra because it's a drug that treats a condition. Everyday I wonder more and more if the people against this law have a clue about what it is and what it does.
 
Number_58 said:
Those of us that pay our health insurance premiums and also pay federal taxes to the general fund month after month and year after year do not wish to see more an more people going on the medicaid dole either. I'm guessing that the over 50 million people on medicaid costs taxpayers more than the estimated $100 billion per year you complain about.

You can't ask for deal when it appears your gonna lose the game Bo...that's just not a very sportsman like attitude. :whip:
Click to expand...

As opposed to what ? You'd rather see them get sick and die ?
 
Doc said:
Except that you and I likely do not have the authority of our local Dog Catchers......

Plus, IF you and I were to discuss this, and even THINK of compromise...well, we would need a few months of 3 six hour days, each, a nice salary, BETTER healthcare than the one we are discussion, provided by the same taxpayers whom we hope to foist this new bill upon, very nice retirement benefits, and, a few cocktail parties...you know, to start "hammering things out..."

Do you play Golf? I do not, but, if we are to "represent the people," I suppose I had better learn, as apparently Golf Courses, Cocktail lounges, and State Dinners are where the Aristocracy seems to do most of their "representing."

Oh, and the Campaign Trail, of course...which is their Primary Job and Duty
Click to expand...

Lol.. well said my friend. :D
 
Number_58 said:
Those of us that pay our health insurance premiums and also pay federal taxes to the general fund month after month and year after year do not wish to see more an more people going on the medicaid dole either. I'm guessing that the over 50 million people on medicaid costs taxpayers more than the estimated $100 billion per year you complain about.

You can't ask for deal when it appears your gonna lose the game Bo...that's just not a very sportsman like attitude. :whip:
Click to expand...

It appears we're going to lose the game 58? Says who.. that wishful thinking Republican gene of yours?
 
connieb said:
Sold. I think we shoud raise the bond though.
Click to expand...

Good point connie. 50 grand would barely cover the emergency appendectomy or a few days of hospitalization and care after an auto wreck. A heart bypass is more like 100k.

That might be a more appropriate bond.
 
WTF - the fact that Dems included millions of their dependent dregs as non-payers is what makes ObamaCare so offensive.
I wanted Medicare For All as it would replace outdated Employer Based Health Care installed by the govt in the 40's. The way to pay for it was a small National Sales Tax paid by everyone - the big objection & stickler with the libs was having to pay for it.
Go figure.... we could have been in the 4th year of transition with the 50 to 65 age already covered and the 0-16 age covered this year... Obama used thug mobster tactics to pass his bill and Congress Never Even Read It!!!!
 
Number_58 said:
You'd rather see the one's Bo refers to get sick and die?
Click to expand...

You mean the people who would make a conscious choice to circumvent the requirements of the law and in doing so knowingly relieve the medical system of its responsibility to treat them in an emergency ?

No. But I'd have to respect their having the freedom to make that choice.
 
NCmusicman said:
WTF - the fact that Dems included millions of their dependent dregs as non-payers is what makes ObamaCare so offensive.
I wanted Medicare For All as it would replace outdated Employer Based Health Care installed by the govt in the 40's. The way to pay for it was a small National Sales Tax paid by everyone - the big objection & stickler with the libs was having to pay for it.
Go figure.... we could have been in the 4th year of transition with the 50 to 65 age already covered and the 0-16 age covered this year... Obama used thug mobster tactics to pass his bill and Congress Never Even Read It!!!!
Click to expand...

You gotta include at least one lie in every post huh NC? Pelosi said, we need to pass it so YOU can see what's in it. Most Congressional Dems read it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top