New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Question

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Sure they did, I am sure it was protocol to destroy over 30k emails while under a subpoena too.... in the midst of a Federal Investigation..........

Golly.... what would you say if Trump did that?...........

Membership has its benefits.
I posted the link to security directives on how to dispose of smart devices. I posted it in response to you. Not my problem if you didn't read it.

Hillary did not destroy emails under subpoena. A tech supporting her system changed the retention date in her email. He extracted those emails before actually setting the new retention dates. That as before the subpoena. The file he deleted and used bleachbit to erase was his doing and not hers.

FBI report: Platte River Network employee used BleachBit to delete old Clinton e-mails
Staffer deleted archived e-mails 3 months after being told to change retention policies

 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Google it tough guy, see how many articles come up....
Yup, here is one.
Fact Check-Alleged Trump fundraising email with ‘nuke codes’ is fabricated

 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
That is incorrect. Either you are lying or don't care to find out the truth. There were negotiations ongoing. The FBI knew he had the docs and even told him to put a lock on the door which he did. He never refused anything. That is nothing but a lefty lie.
He forgets Hillary wiped her emails with a hammer
NARA can't be trusted

 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
Trump was informed in May of 2021 that there were missing documents. Negotiations? About what? They were not his to keep. Finally, in January 2022 the first 15 boxes were returned. Why not all of the documents (including the ones in his desk)? A subpoena was sent in May 2022 and additional documents were returned in June...this time to three FBI agents and a DOJ Lawyer. At that time Trump's lawyer handed them a certified letter saying all documents had been returned. That was a lie. At the time of that visit the FBI agents were shown the storage room at Mar-a-Lago where they saw the boxes. They were not permitted to inspect those boxes. Two days later they sent a message to Trump's lawyers that they needed to lock the room and that none of the contents of the room should be removed. That is when the DOJ applied for a search warrant...which was served in August 2022.
Topic is Biden
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
Sure they did, I am sure it was protocol to destroy over 30k emails while under a subpoena too.... in the midst of a Federal Investigation..........

Golly.... what would you say if Trump did that?...........

Membership has its benefits.
Wasn't the smartphones government property and what other pollie's staff beat smartphone with hammers as protcol
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
He forgets Hillary wiped her emails with a hammer
NARA can't be trusted

Two lies in one post. Hillary did not destroy emails. Certainly not with a hammer.
As I previously posted...state department guidelines are to destroy smart digital devices by shredding to smashing them. Her aids did that.

But that isn't the topic.

Add to that point. Trump attempted to defend his own possession of government documents by saying Obama did the same thing. He lied and NARA answered.

National Archives rejects Trump's claim that Obama took classified documents

 
How dishonest are they? So dishonest that the only thing they could come up to deny they ever speculated that the FBI was looking for nuclear material/ nuke codes is to post something that debunks....something else they made up......

Yup, here is one.
Fact Check-Alleged Trump fundraising email with ‘nuke codes’ is fabricated

If you had any integrity....


theguardian.com/us-news/2022/aug/12/fbi-search-trump-mar-a-lago-home-classified-nuclear-weapons-documents-report

--- Notice the headlines, "nuclear-weapons".."nuclear material"....

Not that it matters but there are more...
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
How dishonest are they? So dishonest that the only thing they could come up to deny they ever speculated that the FBI was looking for nuclear material/ nuke codes is to post something that debunks....something else they made up......



If you had any integrity....


theguardian.com/us-news/2022/aug/12/fbi-search-trump-mar-a-lago-home-classified-nuclear-weapons-documents-report

--- Notice the headlines, "nuclear-weapons".."nuclear material"....

Not that it matters but there are more...
Where did either say anything about nuclear codes? You wrote that the media said the FBI found nuclear codes. Now you write they were searching for nuclear material. In fact there was a document about the readiness of another country's nuclear weapons.

Clearly you have given up on saving any shred of credibility.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Wasn't the smartphones government property and what other pollie's staff beat smartphone with hammers as protcol
Physical destruction of a device is the ultimate way to prevent others from retrieving your information. Specialized services are available that will disintegrate, burn, melt, or pulverize your computer drive and other devices.

If you choose not to use a service, you can destroy your hard drive by driving nails or drilling holes into the device yourself. The remaining physical pieces of the drive must be small enough (at least 1/125 inches) that your information cannot be reconstructed from them.


 

EatTheRich

President
Democrats don't get FBI raids, especially Biden who has the FBI running his personal errands (see the raid on Trump and the one for his Daughters Diary).

Hillary Clinton had her staff cut off the tops of Classified Documents (ya know where it said classified) so they could fax it to her.

No raid for her either...

Membership has its benefits, I keep waiting for the picture of ALL Biden's documents displayed neatly on the floor..... ;)
Democrats who aren’t reasonably suspected of committing serious crimes don’t get FBI raids, although that WILL change if Trump or DeSantis becomes president. If Biden had been caught on video having top-secret documents hidden after being notified that the FBI was suspicious of his refusal to return them, as Trump did, instead of coming forward and organizing a transparent review with an eye to getting them back where they were supposed to go as quickly and securely as possible, he would have been the subject of an FBI raid years ago.
 

EatTheRich

President
That is incorrect. Either you are lying or don't care to find out the truth. There were negotiations ongoing. The FBI knew he had the docs and even told him to put a lock on the door which he did. He never refused anything. That is nothing but a lefty lie.
He was legally obligated to turn the documents over, not negotiate a ransom for their return. And he had them hidden so his own lawyers and the FBI wouldn’t find them while asserting under penalty of perjury that he had turned them all over.
 

EatTheRich

President
Sure they did, I am sure it was protocol to destroy over 30k emails while under a subpoena too.... in the midst of a Federal Investigation..........

Golly.... what would you say if Trump did that?...........

Membership has its benefits.
Clinton didn’t destroy any emails that were under subpoena. She turned them all over. The personal emails she destroyed were from outside the period under the scope of the subpoena. Given that prosecuting and jailing her was priority #1 for the Trump administration and pursued with a vengeance by the Comey regime at the FBI, it is telling that they could never find any pretext to do so.
 

TBLee

Governor
Clinton didn’t destroy any emails that were under subpoena. She turned them all over. The personal emails she destroyed were from outside the period under the scope of the subpoena. Given that prosecuting and jailing her was priority #1 for the Trump administration and pursued with a vengeance by the Comey regime at the FBI, it is telling that they could never find any pretext to do so.
She did indeed destroy emails that were under subpoena.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
She did indeed destroy emails that were under subpoena.
She did not delete any email...from your link

In December 2014, after the work-related emails were preserved, Mills told Platte River Networks – which at the time was managing Clinton’s private server – that Clinton “decided she no longer needed access to any of her e-mails older than 60 days.” Mills instructed the PRN employee — who was not identified — “to modify the e-mail retention policy” on Clinton’s server “to reflect this change,” the FBI said.

But the PRN employee mistakenly did not make the retention-policy change and did not delete the old emails until sometime between March 25 and March 31, even though Mills had sent PRN an email on March 9 that mentioned the committee’s request to preserve emails.

The PRN employee who deleted the emails was a recipient of Mills’ message. However, the employee told the FBI that “he had an ‘oh shit’ moment and sometime between March 25-31, 2015 deleted the Clinton archive mailbox from the PRN server and used BleachBit to delete the exported .PST files he had created on the server containing Clinton’s e-mails.”
 

EatTheRich

President
She did indeed destroy emails that were under subpoena.
1. Both of your links have identical content.
2. Neither supports your claim.
 
Top