Bugsy McGurk
President
Your off-topic canards evade the issue.About? It has. No. Biden lolligagging on test kits and slow relief to health systems will...
Your off-topic canards evade the issue.About? It has. No. Biden lolligagging on test kits and slow relief to health systems will...
n. the issue is well addressed above. including relevant discussion by legal experts. the supreme court ruled correctly. all pouting asideYour off-topic canards evade the issue.
It's amazing to see how you exaggerate numbers. Have you been taking math lessons from the CDC?You actually seem to think that thousands of Americans do not continue to die from the disease. It’s remarkable to see how much your handlers have destroyed your mind.
Nah, they’re just right wing stooges who took it upon themselves to make policy decisions.n. the issue is well addressed above. including relevant discussion by legal experts. the supreme court ruled correctly. all pouting aside
no. that is not how OSHA functions. You'd know that if you werent having a pouty apoplexyNah, they’re just right wing stooges who took it upon themselves to make policy decisions.
Judicial activism at its worst. But that has nothing to do with my point here, which is that their decision will cost thousands of lives. Which, in turn, wingers will try to blame on Biden.
leftist as bugs forgets what they posted before 1-20-2021no. that is not how OSHA functions. You'd know that if you werent having a pouty apoplexy
No normal, well-adjusted, decent person frames a question so fraudulently… but you’re a lying hack, so…Can you cite to the Constitution’s language that prevents the protection of people in the workplace?
I made a mistake in the word I chose.So you admit you Lied
you have no honor
Deplorable
This is not about OSHA functions; it’s about the SCOTUS wingers acting as if they are OSHA, making policy decisions they prefer. Judicial activism at its worst.no. that is not how OSHA functions. You'd know that if you werent having a pouty apoplexy
Translation: Nope. I just made it up. There is no such language in the Constitution.No normal, well-adjusted, decent person frames a question so fraudulently… but you’re a lying hack, so…
Nope. You don’t get to add worldwide illness to the limited scope of OSHA. Nice try, extremist statist.Translation: Nope. I just made it up. There is no such language in the Constitution.
I never Posted my doctor said I was "too sick and feeble" and that's the LIE you post and damn sure more than ne word. You didn't make a Mistake you straight up post a Lie and now proving you have No Honor and trying to derail what you posted and it doesn't surprise me.I made a mistake in the word I chose.
No honor is when you intentionally lie and then someone else has to bust your ass like I have done to you on multiple occasions.
I am here admitting to my mistake in my choice of words.
But if you want to keep on down this road...
Did you or did you not say your doctor told you to not take the vaccine for medical reasons ?
Worldwide illness? What if the illness was confined to this country? Would that alter your “constitutional analysis”?Nope. You don’t get to add worldwide illness to the limited scope of OSHA. Nice try, extremist statist.
Nope. OSHA does not have the authority. Never did. OSHA still acts like OSHA...This is not about OSHA functions; it’s about the SCOTUS wingers acting as if they are OSHA, making policy decisions they prefer. Judicial activism at its worst.
No, but nice attempt to drive a tangent. OSHA branching out to contagious illness-fighter was quite a kooky reach, eh?Worldwide illness? What if the illness was confined to this country? Would that alter your “constitutional analysis”?
Ridiculous. OSHA has been regulating health and safety in the workplace for decades.Nope. OSHA does not have the authority. Never did. OSHA still acts like OSHA...
Yes. It ends there. As outlined aboveRidiculous. OSHA has been regulating health and safety in the workplace for decades.
Looks like you now agree that the “worldwide” nature of the illness is irrelevant (begging the question of why you even mentioned it).No, but nice attempt to drive a tangent. OSHA branching out to contagious illness-fighter was quite a kooky reach, eh?
No, but lying is your only tactic (unless slobbering, spittle, and drool are considered).Looks like you now agree that the “worldwide” nature of the illness is irrelevant (begging the question of why you even mentioned it).
OSHA was not “branching out” to fight illness in the workplace. That is their central mission. But the SCOTUS wingers think they’re better at making policy.
The SCOTUS wingers won’t even let it begin there. OSHA has spent decades regulating toxins in the workplace air, but the SCOTUS wingers think they’re better at making policy, so they are allowing maximum Covid in the workplace despite what OSHA thinks.Yes. It ends there. As outlined above