So when does...

[Lukey]

A resurgent al Qeada, including the assassination of a US ambassador by a guy we let out of Gitmo start to reflect poorly on the Commander in Chief?

 

[ITALIA]

:noidea::frusty::noidea::frusty:

 

[TwoWitnesses]

When was this guy released from Gitmo?

 

[Lukey]

:noidea::frusty::noidea::frusty:

No idea? Typical...

 

[ITALIA]

:deadhorse::deadhorse::deadhorse::deadhorse::nod:

 

[TwoWitnesses]

It does reflect badly on the Commander-in-Chief who was in office when this terrorist was released from GITMO.

 

[Lukey]

When was this guy released from Gitmo?

2007 - but I've never been a fan of Bush so that's irrelevant. Why didn't Obama's national security team keep tabs on this guy? Why didn't they know he'd been released from the Libyan prison and taken up leadership of a terrorist cell? Why didn't they have extra security for all embassy personnel on 9/11? Why were they letting the Libyans handle security after so many "friendly" attacks on US personnel in Afghanistan?

 

[Bo-4]

You are desperate.. that much is obvious.

 

[Lukey]

It does reflect badly on the Commander-in-Chief who was in office when this terrorist was released from GITMO.

He didn't kill an Ambassador on Bush's watch...

 

[TwoWitnesses]

No, he participated in much worse terror during the Bush administration. 3,000 were killed on 9/11 on Bush's watch. That is even though he had advanced warning.

So just like you asked : When does it reflect poorly on the Commander in Chief? 2001, When this terrorist participated in the 9/11 attacks, and 2007, when he was released from gitmo. That's when.