I posted facts. Texas got two seats. You say Colorado should not have gotten a seat. Based on what? Colorado was not listed as an over count. So based on the uncontested count, they got a seat. Florida did get an extra seat.
Minnesota was neither an over or under count, so based on the fact that the count was correct, why do you think they should have lost a seat?
California lost one seat.
Colorado gained one seat.
Florida gained a seat.
Illinois lost a seat.
Michigan lost a seat.
Montana gained a seat.
New York lost a seat.
North Carolina gained a seat.
Ohio lost a seat.
Oregon gained a seat.
Pennsylvania lost a seat.
Texas gained two seats.
West Virginia lost a seat.
Where did I say Colorado shouldn't have gotten a seat? The article said they shouldn't have gotten a seat...to which you've provide no proof that the author of the article is wrong. I posted an article from Forbes that provided information...if you can prove what the author said is wrong...cough it up.
Prove that the Texas count wasn't short by up to 985,000 people...that New York wasn't overcounted by as many as 1,000,000 people...provide proof that Texas should have received an
additional representative over the one they received and Florida shouldn't have gotten two
additional representatives...that Minnesota and Rhode Island shouldn't have lost an additional representative.
The only thing you've provided in terms of anything is a list of states that gained or lost seats. Nowhere does the article dispute that...
Now provide proof that anything the author of the article says is incorrect or carry-on debating against yourself. You've proven absolutely nothing.