The (&@%$) Obama administration

[Jen]

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Which "Park Ranger" supposedly said that?

 

[Minotaur]

Look at the law regarding closing government Jen. You've been had.

 

[resident_evil]

Which "Park Ranger" supposedly said that?

Look at the law regarding closing government Jen. You've been had.

You're both full of crap. The closing of open air parks with barriers is all the evidence needed to demonstrate a ridiculous attempt to make life difficult. As an egregiously ham handed attempt as the IRS denying Tea Party groups fair and equal treatment before the law.

The placing of the barriers are as ham handed in how the IRS handed over direct evidence of wrong doing in correspondence with U.S. citizens. Really, how incompetent must the IRS be to actually supply the materials to be submitted as evidence in court cases against them.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

You're both full of crap. The closing of open air parks with barriers is all the evidence needed to demonstrate a ridiculous attempt to make life difficult. As an egregiously ham handed attempt as the IRS denying Tea Party groups fair and equal treatment before the law.

The placing of the barriers are as ham handed in how the IRS handed over direct evidence of wrong doing in correspondence with U.S. citizens. Really, how incompetent must the IRS be to actually supply the materials to be submitted as evidence in a court cases against them.

I'm full of crap because I asked a question?

Do you know the answer to the question?

 

[Minotaur]

You're both full of crap. The closing of open air parks with barriers is all the evidence needed to demonstrate a ridiculous attempt to make life difficult. As an egregiously ham handed attempt as the IRS denying Tea Party groups fair and equal treatment before the law.

The placing of the barriers are as ham handed in how the IRS handed over direct evidence of wrong doing in correspondence with U.S. citizens. Really, how incompetent must the IRS be to actually supply the materials to be submitted as evidence in a court cases against them.

You are wrong. There is a 143 year old law: The Antideficiency Act dictating that they may be subject to disciplinary action, suspension and even "fines, imprisonment, or both."

They can't even volunteer to staff or assist in these sites. No oversite at all requires closure. Any changes require the legal protocol as all changes are legally reviewed after the fact. And in fact even Congress is fearful of that Act.

 

[resident_evil]

I'm full of crap because I asked a question?

Do you know the answer to the question?

You're full of crap because your question is asked and answered with a picture from which any thinking person can extrapolate a simple truth.

 

[resident_evil]

You are wrong. There is a 143 year old law: The Antideficiency Act dictating that they may be subject to disciplinary action, suspension and even "fines, imprisonment, or both.

They can't even volunteer to staff or assist in these sites. No oversite at all requires closure. Any changes require the legal protocol as all changes are legally reviewed after the fact. And in fact even Congress is fearful of that Act.

So you're saying that putting the barriers up was against this Anti-deficiency Act?

 

[Minotaur]

You're full of crap because your question is asked and answered with a picture from which any thinking person can extrapolate a simple truth.

But you were wrong.

 

[Minotaur]

So you're saying that putting the barriers up was against this Anti-deficiency Act?

I am saying they could NOT staff it even with volunteers so until it was approved by legal means in a closed government, putting the barriers up was 100% required to keep the public out of a closed area. Did you know that parks had to be closed?

 

[resident_evil]

But you were wrong.

No to me an open air monument/park really can't be closed. It might be un-staffed and buildings may be locked but trying to ring them with a barrier is a problem.

 

[resident_evil]

I am saying they could NOT staff it even with volunteers so until it was approved putting the barriers up was 100% required to keep the public out of a closed area.

I've just lost all respect for you. And the reason is because you demonstrate a bureaucratic mind.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

No to me an open air monument/park really can't be closed. It might be un-staffed and buildings may be locked but trying to ring them with a barrier is a problem.

So you would allow local hoodlums to run wild spraying graffiti all over the WWLL monument?

 

[Minotaur]

No to me an open air monument/park really can't be closed. It might be un-staffed and buildings may be locked but trying to ring them with a barrier is a problem.

Unfortunately there is legal and illegal so what seems like it should be a Federal exception is rarely an exception. These are very old procedures.

 

[resident_evil]

So you would allow local hoodlums to run wild spraying graffiti all over the WWLL monument?

Hoodlums? You mean the 99% of Occupy Wall Street? No, I'd pay Punisher to drop them with a .308 Winchester from a snipers vantage.

 

[Minotaur]

So you would allow local hoodlums to run wild spraying graffiti all over the WWLL monument?

Well that explains why they block it off when unmanned but not how inefficient the protections are when government is working. Ugh.

 

[resident_evil]

Unfortunately there is legal and illegal so what seems like it should be a Federal exception is rarely an exception. These are very old procedures.

And these are lies. Nobody spends money to do things like put barriers around open air monuments or parks when there is supposedly no money to spend. Only a socialist/c0mmunistic mind would grasp this idea and hold it as rational.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Hoodlums? You mean the 99% of Occupy Wall Street? No, I'd pay Punisher to drop them with a .308 Winchester from a snipers vantage.

Without guards the graffiti crews could run wild. You're good with that? You REALLY think open air memorials don't need guards?

 

[Minotaur]

I've just lost all respect for you. And the reason is because you demonstrate a bureaucratic mind.

I didn't write the law. I told you about it because you are unaware of it. Now you know. I gave NO personal opinion. Shame on you.

 

[resident_evil]

Without guards the graffiti crews could run wild. You're good with that? You REALLY think open air memorials don't need guards?

Do you thinks the barriers being used (as shown in pictures) will keep these hoodlums at bay? You really, really think that?