New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

This is government...

You are right...Americans should let the "insurance companies" to continue to rip them off and collect huge profits at the public's expense
 
Inefficient? Hardly.

Federal Acquisition Regulations requires open bidded contracts, including those supplying cookies, and most often the government has to the use the lowest bidder.

Unless the type of cookies the government wants are spelled out in detail, the lowest bidder can get away with supplying low / inferior quality materials which would be wasting our hard earned tax dollars - wouldn't want that now would we.

Considering the variety of products covered in the specificaton, 28 pages doesn't seem that bad, and I've written / read more specifications than I care to count.
 
hard to say. though, given the stringency applied to the cookie process.. i'd buy a dozen. :confused:
 
see my post (yesterday) "what if your home was run like the US government".

specifically the theory that your dad would issue thousands of new regulations every year, including detailed instructions on how to clean the bathroom, and an ever changing list of approved brands of aspirins and band aids which qualify for parental reimbursement.
 
as seen on tv said:
see my post (yesterday) "what if your home was run like the US government".

specifically the theory that your dad would issue thousands of new regulations every year, including detailed instructions on how to clean the bathroom, and an ever changing list of approved brands of aspirins and band aids which qualify for parental reimbursement.
Click to expand...

I suppose Texas deciding to secede from the Union would be sort of like you deciding to get divorced from your husband?
 
Cerulean Mutt said:
Inefficient? Hardly.

Federal Acquisition Regulations requires open bidded contracts, including those supplying cookies, and most often the government has to the use the lowest bidder.

Unless the type of cookies the government wants are spelled out in detail, the lowest bidder can get away with supplying low / inferior quality materials which would be wasting our hard earned tax dollars - wouldn't want that now would we.

Considering the variety of products covered in the specificaton, 28 pages doesn't seem that bad, and I've written / read more specifications than I care to count.
Click to expand...

I suspect that getting on the government cookie-provision bid list requires "certified ingredient listing" demonstrating that diversity of chips (not just chocolate) are integrated into each confection, both bleached and unbleached flour are utilized, and that no cookie is excluded based on baked color, shape, or material make-up. Should any complaint arise that oatmeal is promoted ahead of snickerdoodle...or should said cookies be shown to express sufficient interest in being collectively consumed, no management interference in the process will be abided - and the full force of the state shall be brought to bear.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top