We may have been wrong about Hillary and Benghazi...it may be higher up.

[Drumcollie]

https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/0...s-on-its-way-to-benghazi-but-was-turned-back/

Col. Andrew Wood had once commanded a Special Forces anti-terrorism team protecting Ambassador Chis Stevens and other diplomats in Libya. In October of 2012, Woods told Congress that one month before the attacks in Benghazi, his team had been removed from Libya by the Obama administration, despite the numerous warnings of impending terrorist attacks. Wood told Attkisson that Special Forces (the ones mentioned in the "spinning up" email from Jeremy Bash) were on their way to Benghazi, but were ordered to turn back.

"Those individuals I know loaded aircraft and got on their way to Benghazi to respond to that incident. They were not allowed to cross the border as per protocol until they got approval from the commander in chief," Wood explained. "That authority has to come from him or they're not allowed to enter the country."

If this were true and the evidence presented so far would then suggest that everything Hillary did was just following orders ...from the lack of security after multiples of requests to the turn down on the assistance during and the Coptic Christian video lies...was just following orders.

 

[Lukey]

Oh it was definitely higher up! It came directly from the West Wing.

 

[Jen]

Oh it was definitely higher up! It came directly from the West Wing.

So Obama is who is being protected on the Benghazi thing.
No surprise there.

 

[middleview]

https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/0...s-on-its-way-to-benghazi-but-was-turned-back/



If this were true and the evidence presented so far would then suggest that everything Hillary did was just following orders ...from the lack of security after multiples of requests to the turn down on the assistance during and the Coptic Christian video lies...was just following orders.

So the republicans in the house lied on their investigation? Really?

 

[Lukey]

So the republicans in the house lied on their investigation? Really?

"It's not credible what he's claiming," Zuckoff said of the station chief, whom he said he had tried to interview when writing the book, but his request was denied.

http://www.usnews.com/news/entertai...ghazi-book-stands-by-pivotal-stand-down-scene

 

[middleview]

"It's not credible what he's claiming," Zuckoff said of the station chief, whom he said he had tried to interview when writing the book, but his request was denied.

http://www.usnews.com/news/entertainment/articles/2016-01-16/author-of-benghazi-book-stands-by-pivotal-stand-down-scene

So Zuckoff is telling the truth and the republican house intelligence committee investigation lied.

 

[Dawg]

Θ was AWOL for 8 hours...........seems there was a FUND RAISER in Vegas I think, or somewhere..........either way Jarrett who has called all shots since 2009, ordered the STAND DOWN,

http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/080713-666729-jarrett-gave-benghazi-stand-down-order.htm

hell, they arrested a GENERAL for NOT standing down:

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/rogu...-teams-ignoring-libya-stand-down-order_102012

 

[Drumcollie]

Oh it was definitely higher up! It came directly from the West Wing.

It' starting to look like this although I'd rather pin it on Hillary for now. To paraphrase from Harry Reid: "They can call it whatever they want. Hillary didn't win did she?"

 

[Drumcollie]

So Zuckoff is telling the truth and the republican house intelligence committee investigation lied.

what lie? I'd like to hear how this matters...considering Harry Reid's quote: "

They can call it whatever they want. Romney didn't win did he?"

 

[Drumcollie]

So the republicans in the house lied on their investigation? Really?

I fail to see how that revalation matters.

"They can call it whatever they want. Romney didn't win did he?" Reid said during a wide-ranging interview.

 

[Lukey]

So Zuckoff is telling the truth and the republican house intelligence committee investigation lied.

It's semantics. No formal "stand down" order was issued. But the guy running the CIA station in Benghazi was asking higher ups what he should do and they were giving him the run around (because they were getting the run around from the White House), so he kept telling his guys to sit tight. Finally they got tired of waiting and went without orders.

 

[Constitutional Sheepdog]

https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/0...s-on-its-way-to-benghazi-but-was-turned-back/



If this were true and the evidence presented so far would then suggest that everything Hillary did was just following orders ...from the lack of security after multiples of requests to the turn down on the assistance during and the Coptic Christian video lies...was just following orders.

I'd bet every firearm I have that the marching orders or lack of it came from the white house.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/0...s-on-its-way-to-benghazi-but-was-turned-back/



If this were true and the evidence presented so far would then suggest that everything Hillary did was just following orders ...from the lack of security after multiples of requests to the turn down on the assistance during and the Coptic Christian video lies...was just following orders.

FYI, all this hooey was exhaustively investigated during the 8 prior Benghazi investigations already, including by the GOP. Their 8th Benghazi investigation report, in particular, shot down these lies. The GOP House members. They shot down the lies.

Not that it keeps haters from repeating them.

 

[middleview]

It's semantics. No formal "stand down" order was issued. But the guy running the CIA station in Benghazi was asking higher ups what he should do and they were giving him the run around (because they were getting the run around from the White House), so he kept telling his guys to sit tight. Finally they got tired of waiting and went without orders.

Or....the CIA station chief was telling the truth that he was trying to get help from various Libyan groups and getting the run around...It would be interesting for "Bob" and the three guys who argue they were told to stand down to be interviewed together....see who is more credible.

 

[middleview]

I fail to see how that revalation matters.

How likely is it that they lied to cover for Obama?

 

[Constitutional Sheepdog]

How likely is it that they lied to cover for Obama?

Two months before an uncertain election why would you even ask such a question?

 

[middleview]

https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/0...s-on-its-way-to-benghazi-but-was-turned-back/

If this were true and the evidence presented so far would then suggest that everything Hillary did was just following orders ...from the lack of security after multiples of requests to the turn down on the assistance during and the Coptic Christian video lies...was just following orders.

There has been no evidence to support your conclusion. The evidence that flies in the face of your anti-Obama nonsense is the findings of a number of different investigations.

Additional assistance was sent from Tripoli...and you continue to say none was sent. That was the closest group of armed Americans.

 

[middleview]

Two months before an uncertain election why would you even ask such a question?

Please pay attention. We were talking about the republican investigation.

 

[middleview]

It' starting to look like this although I'd rather pin it on Hillary for now. To paraphrase from Harry Reid: "They can call it whatever they want. Hillary didn't win did she?"

You assume that whether or not the militia group attacked because of the video...which didn't help Romney in 2012, is going to help someone in 2016. It won't.

 

[Constitutional Sheepdog]

Please pay attention. We were talking about the republican investigation.

News flash since the Republicans were given an election historical wave they have been acting worse than democrats, so your argument is nothing new