New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

We've lost an unsung hero.

Boltlady

Boltlady

Governor
A few days ago a man died who has done more for the world than most people will ever know. Because of his efforts you've heard of the secretive Bilderberg group. Some of you make jokes about them or simply dismiss them as a private club that conspiracy theorists have a field day over, but there are many now who understand just how much power they wield.

When people refer to the 'elite', they are the people they mean. They've met every year for many years. The top power brokers in the world from media, politics, royalty and industry attend those meetings and yet, until this man spent the last 30 years of his life tracking them and reporting about them, nobody had ever heard about it. He almost single handedly shed light on those who set and implement the various agendas in the world. It has allowed a number of their plans to be thwarted and millions of people to have their eyes opened.

Jim Tucker was the old fashioned kind of investigative reporter who actually dug into stories and reported them. The security around the Bilderberg meetings is phenomenal but he was able to find out where and when they would meet, and quite often he was able to find out about their plans. Naturally the MSM would stay very quiet about it because they're part of it.

He will be sorely missed, but he was able to teach a number of others about how to get at that particular information. We can only hope that the next batch of reporters will be able to follow in his giant footsteps.

R.I.P. Jim Tucker

http://intellihub.com/2013/04/28/ou...-may-get-the-last-laugh-on-david-rockefeller/
 
Boltlady said:
He almost single handedly shed light on those who set and implement the various agendas in the world. It has allowed a number of their plans to be thwarted and millions of people to have their eyes opened.
Click to expand...


I am curious as to which specific plans were thwarted.
 
Boltlady said:
We're not yet one world gov't, one religion, one world currency, etc.
Click to expand...

Notice the "yet"....the eternal out for the conspiracists....popular along with "soon" or "if we don't wake up".

Evil plans are "thwarted"...but "are still imminent". Thus when the Dystopia fails to come after years and years and years and years and YEARS of doomsaying, the excuse is "_______ revealed their plans and delayed them...for a while." But they're never "defeated"....nor CAN they be defeated.

Why?....because Conspiracism is a religion. It'd be like a fundamentalist Christian saying "Welp, that's it...we've beaten Satan. He's no longer a threat". Can't happen....the religion would fall apart. Same deal here.

And just like a religion, it has its "saints"....in this case the hagiography incudes guys like Jim Tucker.
 
Boltlady said:
A few days ago a man died who has done more for the world than most people will ever know. Because of his efforts you've heard of the secretive Bilderberg group. Some of you make jokes about them or simply dismiss them as a private club that conspiracy theorists have a field day over, but there are many now who understand just how much power they wield.

When people refer to the 'elite', they are the people they mean. They've met every year for many years. The top power brokers in the world from media, politics, royalty and industry attend those meetings and yet, until this man spent the last 30 years of his life tracking them and reporting about them, nobody had ever heard about it. He almost single handedly shed light on those who set and implement the various agendas in the world. It has allowed a number of their plans to be thwarted and millions of people to have their eyes opened.

Jim Tucker was the old fashioned kind of investigative reporter who actually dug into stories and reported them. The security around the Bilderberg meetings is phenomenal but he was able to find out where and when they would meet, and quite often he was able to find out about their plans. Naturally the MSM would stay very quiet about it because they're part of it.

He will be sorely missed, but he was able to teach a number of others about how to get at that particular information. We can only hope that the next batch of reporters will be able to follow in his giant footsteps.

R.I.P. Jim Tucker

http://intellihub.com/2013/04/28/ou...-may-get-the-last-laugh-on-david-rockefeller/
Click to expand...

well, even the deranged lunatics , the two legged and two armed human looking creatures are mortal
 
GordonGecko said:
Notice the "yet"....the eternal out for the conspiracists....popular along with "soon" or "if we don't wake up".

Evil plans are "thwarted"...but "are still imminent". Thus when the Dystopia fails to come after years and years and years and years and YEARS of doomsaying, the excuse is "_______ revealed their plans and delayed them...for a while." But they're never "defeated"....nor CAN they be defeated.

Why?....because Conspiracism is a religion. It'd be like a fundamentalist Christian saying "Welp, that's it...we've beaten Satan. He's no longer a threat". Can't happen....the religion would fall apart. Same deal here.

And just like a religion, it has its "saints"....in this case the hagiography incudes guys like Jim Tucker.
Click to expand...

very well said, GG, you hit the "10"
 
Sorry when anyone dies.

I thought I uncovered their existence first. I resent him getting credit as a lot of time and effort went into my research. Sure they hid but they were no match for me. I found that sinister mystery group right here:

http://www.bilderbergmeetings.org/index.php

So now I hang out there and continue my spy V spy research. Stay tuned as I have just found out they may meet again. You have to really keep an eye on PRIVATE groups inviting leaders together and discussing global things n stuff.

This private group discussion should be OUTLAWED in America.
 
I'm too lazy for conspiracies and thank goodness I am. Ha, ha!

That said...I have 20/20 vision now baby! I'm almost ready to tackle a book again. ;)
 
Boltlady said:
You really should read the following article from the IMF website from Nov. 2000. Then look around and see where we are today and tell me again that the whole idea is malarky.

http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/ecforums/110800.htm
Click to expand...

From your own link, these are the two primary reasons why the idea of a single global currency is malarky:

The travails of the euro since its introduction last year are a stark reminder of the dangers of corralling different and divergent economies into a single currency, however advanced they may be. True single-currency candidates require international replication that is not found among real, functioning, market economies.

Under a single regional currency, normal cyclical movements in a country's macroeconomic indicators suddenly become threats to regional stability that must be muffled or suppressed, irrespective of their self-correcting impetus or the economic signals they are transmitting.

LeRoy: Possibly, the situation could be different a century from now, or two centuries from now. But for the next several decades, I tell you there is not a chance in hell of a single global currency emerging.
 
I'm eternally grateful for Jim Tucker's preventing the earth from exploding into a fiery ball of hell.

What? You tell me..HAS the earth exploded into a fiery ball of hell? I didn't THINK so!
 
LeRoy_Was_Here said:
From your own link, these are the two primary reasons why the idea of a single global currency is malarky:

The travails of the euro since its introduction last year are a stark reminder of the dangers of corralling different and divergent economies into a single currency, however advanced they may be. True single-currency candidates require international replication that is not found among real, functioning, market economies.

Under a single regional currency, normal cyclical movements in a country's macroeconomic indicators suddenly become threats to regional stability that must be muffled or suppressed, irrespective of their self-correcting impetus or the economic signals they are transmitting.

LeRoy: Possibly, the situation could be different a century from now, or two centuries from now. But for the next several decades, I tell you there is not a chance in hell of a single global currency emerging.
Click to expand...

May I assume that you're familiar with the recent formation of BRIC?
 
Boltlady said:
May I assume that you're familiar with the recent formation of BRIC?
Click to expand...

BRIC is simply an acronym referring to Brazil, Russia, India, and China. There is NO evidence that they are moving towards a single currency:

In economics, BRIC is a grouping acronym that refers to the countries of Brazil, Russia, India and China, which are all deemed to be at a similar stage of newly advanced economic development. It is typically rendered as "the BRICs" or "the BRIC countries" or "the BRIC economies" or alternatively as the "Big Four".

The acronym was coined by Jim O'Neill in a 2001 paper entitled "Building Better Global Economic BRICs".[1][2][3] The acronym has come into widespread use as a symbol of the shift in global economic power away from the developed G7 economies towards the developing world. It is estimated that BRIC economies will overtake G7 economies by 2027.[4]

According to a paper published in 2005, Mexico and South Korea were the only other countries comparable to the BRICs, but their economies were excluded initially because they were considered already more developed, as they were already members of the OECD.[5] The same creator of the term "BRIC" coined the term MIKT, that includes Mexico and South Korea.

Several of the more developed of the N-11 countries, in particular Turkey, Mexico, Indonesia and Nigeria, are seen as the most likely contenders to the BRICs. Some other developing countries that have not yet reached the N-11 economic level, such as South Africa, aspire to BRIC status. Economists at the Reuters 2011 Investment Outlook Summit, held on 6–7 December 2010, dismissed the notion of South Africa joining BRIC.[6] Jim O'Neill told the summit that he was constantly being lobbied about BRIC status by various countries. He said that South Africa, at a population of under 50 million people, was just too small an economy to join the BRIC ranks.[7] However, after the BRIC countries formed a political organization among themselves, they later expanded to include South Africa, becoming the BRICS.[8]

Goldman Sachs has argued that, since the four BRIC countries are developing rapidly, by 2050 their combined economies could eclipse the combined economies of the current richest countries of the world. These four countries, combined, currently account for more than a quarter of the world's land area and more than 40% of the world's population.[9][10]

Goldman Sachs did not argue that the BRICs would organize themselves into an economic bloc, or a formal trading association, as the European Union has done.[11] However, there are some indications that the "four BRIC countries have been seeking to form a 'political club' or 'alliance'", and thereby converting "their growing economic power into greater geopolitical clout".[12][13] On June 16, 2009, the leaders of the BRIC countries held their first summit in Yekaterinburg, and issued a declaration calling for the establishment of an equitable, democratic and multipolar world order. Since then they have met in Brasília in 2010, met in Sanya in 2011 and in New Delhi, India in 2012.[14]

In recent years, the BRICs have received increasing scholarly attention. Brazilian political economist Marcos Troyjo and French investment banker Christian Déséglise founded the BRICLab at Columbia University, a Forum examining the strategic, political and economic consequences of the rise of BRIC countries, especially by analyzing their projects for power, prosperity and prestige through graduate courses, special sessions with guest speakers, Executive Education programs, and annual conferences for policymakers, business and academic leaders, and students. [15]
 
I wouldn't mind a one world government and currency, but one world religion will never happen because you have Christians, Jews, and Muslims still fightin' over which son was at the top of the Mountain when Abraham heard that voice to kill the little bastard... ( I know wrong )

Also Hindu's and Buddhists make another good amount of the world religious people...

So one world religion will never happen even though most us all pray to the same divine being without knowing it, well we might know but we argue over the small details of which son was going to be sacrafice that day, well with Abrahamic religions at least...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top