New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

What Obama said about Benghazi attack TWO DAYS LATER while campaigning

NinaS

NinaS

Senator
Supporting Member
in Denver Colorado. Check out the bold print. 9/11/2001 was not mentioned...he was talking about
the Benghazi attack.

SEPTEMBER 13, 2012
Let me say at the outset that obviously our hearts are heavy this week -- we had a tough day a couple of days ago, for four Americans were killed in an attack on our diplomatic post in Libya. Yesterday I had a chance to go over to the State Department to talk to friends and colleagues of those who were killed. And these were Americans who, like so many others, both in uniform and civilians, who serve in difficult and dangerous places all around the world to advance the interests and the values that we hold dear as Americans.
And a lot of times their work goes unheralded, doesn't get a lot of attention, but it is vitally important. We enjoy our security and our liberty because of the sacrifices that they make. And they do an outstanding job every single day without a lot of fanfare. (Applause.)
So what I want all of you to know is that we are going to bring those who killed our fellow Americans to justice. (Applause.) I want people around the world to hear me: To all those who would do us harm, no act of terror will go unpunished. It will not dim the light of the values that we proudly present to the rest of the world. No act of violence shakes the resolve of the United States of America. (Applause.)

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/10/16/transcript-truthers-conservatives-deny-obama-ca/190677
 
The bottom line is you have no quote of him saying "the Benghazi attack was terrorism" or that the attackers were "terrorists." In fact, he referred directly to Stevens' attackers as "killers." We all know how good he is at speechifying without saying anything that can be pinned on him, so he can go whichever way he wants after the fact. This will work really well with you OWS 20%ers but most Americans are hearing this and saying, "now WTF is that supposed to mean?"
 
Lukey said:
The bottom line is you have no quote of him saying "the Benghazi attack was terrorism" or that the attackers were "terrorists." In fact, he referred directly to Stevens' attackers as "killers." We all know how good he is at speechifying without saying anything that can be pinned on him, so he can go whichever way he wants after the fact. This will work really well with you OWS 20%ers but most Americans are hearing this and saying, "now WTF is that supposed to mean?"
Click to expand...

What the HELL was he talking about here LUKEY???? He was talking about the Benghazi attack and he referred to it as an ACT OF TERROR. Do you see any reference in his statement about any other attack. DAMN...you are very very desperate aren't you??? And really...Candy Crowley never did say Mitt was RIGHT and she was WRONG. YoU PEOPLE just can't handle it can you when that SOB Romney is called out on his lies?
 
Lukey said:
The bottom line is you have no quote of him saying "the Benghazi attack was terrorism" or that the attackers were "terrorists." In fact, he referred directly to Stevens' attackers as "killers." We all know how good he is at speechifying without saying anything that can be pinned on him, so he can go whichever way he wants after the fact. This will work really well with you OWS 20%ers but most Americans are hearing this and saying, "now WTF is that supposed to mean?"
Click to expand...

That's right Luckey, "acts of terror" are committed by nuns, priests, and rodeo clowns, never, ever by terrorists. Damn, you're funny!
 
Lukey said:
The bottom line is you have no quote of him saying "the Benghazi attack was terrorism" or that the attackers were "terrorists." In fact, he referred directly to Stevens' attackers as "killers." We all know how good he is at speechifying without saying anything that can be pinned on him, so he can go whichever way he wants after the fact. This will work really well with you OWS 20%ers but most Americans are hearing this and saying, "now WTF is that supposed to mean?"
Click to expand...

ACT as in singular there Lukey, but you obfuscate and dodge your previous contention per usual. Catch a clue on what it means to be "presidential". One does not issue press releases or hold news conferences immediately after the fact with the clear purpose of politicizing a tragedy. And one does not become overly specific until ALL the facts are in. Capiche?
 
NinaS said:
What the HELL was he talking about here LUKEY???? He was talking about the Benghazi attack and he referred to it as an ACT OF TERROR. Do you see any reference in his statement about any other attack. DAMN...you are very very desperate aren't you??? And really...Candy Crowley never did say Mitt was RIGHT and she was WRONG. YoU PEOPLE just can't handle it can you when that SOB Romney is called out on his lies?
Click to expand...

No he did not. Near the end of the speech he made a broad statement about America's commitment to fighting radical Islam. In the beginning, when he was specifically talking about the Benghazi attack, he not only didn't refer to it as an "act of terrorism" he specifically referred to the attackers as "killers" rather than terrorists.
 
Bo-4 said:
ACT as in singular there Lukey, but you obfuscate and dodge your previous contention per usual. Catch a clue on what it means to be "presidential". One does not issue press releases or hold news conferences immediately after the fact with the clear purpose of politicizing a tragedy. And one does not become overly specific until ALL the facts are in. Capiche?
Click to expand...

He said "ACTS" - plural, and in general.
 
Lukey said:
He said "ACTS" - plural, and in general.
Click to expand...

Which address are you talking about LUKEY??? Stay with the subject please. We are referring to the address in Denver on the 13th and YOU KNOW IT.
He said ACT OF TERROR ACT..SINGULAR. And he was talking about ONE ATTACK....and you know it.
 
Lukey said:
He said "ACTS" - plural, and in general.
Click to expand...

No, he didn't. Here is what he said in Denver, two days after the attack, and it was quoted for you earlier in this thread:

I want people around the world to hear me: To all those who would do us harm, no act of terror will go unpunished.

LeRoy: And, just personally, I think that sentence is very easy to understand. Yet you're asking "Now WTF is that supposed to mean?"

Arkady is right: You have a serious reading comprehension problem.
 
Lukey said:
No he did not. Near the end of the speech he made a broad statement about America's commitment to fighting radical Islam. In the beginning, when he was specifically talking about the Benghazi attack, he not only didn't refer to it as an "act of terrorism" he specifically referred to the attackers as "killers" rather than terrorists.
Click to expand...

You better go take a much needed nap if you can't even read a SUBJECT LINE. I am referring to his campaign speech in Denver Colorado on the 13th. And remember...Romney said he didn't mention it for how long??? Romney was wrong. Romney used this attack to make a political statement hours after it happened. He didn't even wait to hear from the President.
 
LeRoy_Was_Here said:
No, he didn't. Here is what he said in Denver, two days after the attack, and it was quoted for you earlier in this thread:

I want people around the world to hear me: To all those who would do us harm, no act of terror will go unpunished.

LeRoy: And, just personally, I think that sentence is very easy to understand. Yet you're asking "Now WTF is that supposed to mean?"

Arkady is right: You have a serious reading comprehension problem.
Click to expand...

Didn't you know?? He will NEVER admit he is wrong. He'll just spin and spin and then leave the thread and his pals here will pat his back and say...you really showed them, Lukey. LOL
 
NinaS said:
Didn't you know?? He will NEVER admit he is wrong. He'll just spin and spin and then leave the thread and his pals here will pat his back and say...you really showed them, Lukey. LOL
Click to expand...

At this point he's going all Rain Man on us. Hilarious. :D
 
NinaS said:
You better go take a much needed nap if you can't even read a SUBJECT LINE. I am referring to his campaign speech in Denver Colorado on the 13th. And remember...Romney said he didn't mention it for how long??? Romney was wrong. Romney used this attack to make a political statement hours after it happened. He didn't even wait to hear from the President.
Click to expand...

Let me say at the outset that obviously our hearts are heavy this week -- we had a tough day a couple of days ago, for four Americans were killed in an attack on our diplomatic post in Libya.

Where does he call the Benghazi attack a "terrorist" attack? I just see "in an attack."
 
Bo-4 said:
No Lukey, he said ACTS on the 12th and ACT on the 13th. Both times he was talking about Benghazi.

Man you're desperate today.. Bo understands!
Click to expand...

He was?

Let me say at the outset that obviously our hearts are heavy this week -- we had a tough day a couple of days ago, for four Americans were killed in an attack on our diplomatic post in Libya.

Where in that sentence does he use the word terror, terrorism or terrorist?
 
LeRoy_Was_Here said:
No, he didn't. Here is what he said in Denver, two days after the attack, and it was quoted for you earlier in this thread:

I want people around the world to hear me: To all those who would do us harm, no act of terror will go unpunished.

LeRoy: And, just personally, I think that sentence is very easy to understand. Yet you're asking "Now WTF is that supposed to mean?"

Arkady is right: You have a serious reading comprehension problem.
Click to expand...

How the ef are we supposed to know what he was talking about?

Let me say at the outset that obviously our hearts are heavy this week -- we had a tough day a couple of days ago, for four Americans were killed in an attack on our diplomatic post in Libya.

Where in that sentence does he use the word, terror, terrorism or terrorist?
 
NinaS said:
Which address are you talking about LUKEY??? Stay with the subject please. We are referring to the address in Denver on the 13th and YOU KNOW IT.
He said ACT OF TERROR ACT..SINGULAR. And he was talking about ONE ATTACK....and you know it.
Click to expand...

Let me say at the outset that obviously our hearts are heavy this week -- we had a tough day a couple of days ago, for four Americans were killed in an attack on our diplomatic post in Libya.

Where in that sentence does he use the word, terror, terrorism or terrorist?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top