What an ego you seem to have.
a regular legend in her own behind
I don't know why one would need to know a poster all that well to dislike what they post and to draw conclusions from it, like whether you like or dislike that poster.
If you don't like dishonest people, or the ignorant way outta their league but thinking/acting otherwise, etc, well, that's because they have a problem with integrity. The "problem" with this effort on her part is that she appears to be arguing that her integrity, etc, issues are somehow detached from who and what she is. Some don't see the satisfying of minimal societal expectations like loving family and friends, and puppies and kittens too, as sufficiently redeeming to warrant the respect, etc, she thinks she deserves.
And of course there's nothing special about her in regards to all of this. Many of us have a "problem" with the chronic and unending dishonesty, etc, of rightwingers these days, and pretty much treat them all the same.
"A problem is the relation between human will and reality. When will and reality do not coincide, the resolution of this gap between reality and will is the solution of the problem. A problem implies a desired outcome coupled with an apparent deficiency, doubt or inconsistency that prevents the outcome from taking place."
Those of us in the reality-based community will always have a "problem" her kind, and the idea that we need to "know her" well enough to have her phone number before we can have a "problem" with her, only shows the hows and whys of that. That's like saying that if she were a blatant racist like some of her now gone "pals", we can't have a "problem" with her because we don't know her well enough to have her phone number.
Speaking only for myself, I wouldn't want her pucking phone number. .
In that case, sorry for my reply. Hope I didn't offend you.
there's a diff between hate and dislike.
I "dislike" a lot of people around here, and could care less if the feeling is mutual or not.
On the other hand, there's only one still left around here that I hate, and I suspect you could guess who that is.
sure you do.
Your old "non-pal".
Any sense of humor is a good thing.
While I'm not up on how you debate other subjects, this is one that you're not doing very well with. You come off as a person who is so filled with preconceived ideas about people in general that there is no room for learning about them, understanding them or accepting them. In short, you present as a highly prejudiced individual.a regular legend in her own behind
I don't know why one would need to know a poster all that well to dislike what they post and to draw conclusions from it, like whether you like or dislike that poster.
If you don't like dishonest people, or the ignorant way outta their league but thinking/acting otherwise, etc, well, that's because they have a problem with integrity. The "problem" with this effort on her part is that she appears to be arguing that her integrity, etc, issues are somehow detached from who and what she is. Some don't see the satisfying of minimal societal expectations like loving family and friends, and puppies and kittens too, as sufficiently redeeming to warrant the respect, etc, she thinks she deserves.
And of course there's nothing special about her in regards to all of this. Many of us have a "problem" with the chronic and unending dishonesty, etc, of rightwingers these days, and pretty much treat them all the same.
"A problem is the relation between human will and reality. When will and reality do not coincide, the resolution of this gap between reality and will is the solution of the problem. A problem implies a desired outcome coupled with an apparent deficiency, doubt or inconsistency that prevents the outcome from taking place."
Those of us in the reality-based community will always have a "problem" her kind, and the idea that we need to "know her" well enough to have her phone number before we can have a "problem" with her, only shows the hows and whys of that. That's like saying that if she were a blatant racist like some of her now gone "pals", we can't have a "problem" with her because we don't know her well enough to have her phone number.
Speaking only for myself, I wouldn't want her pucking phone number. .
While I'm not up on how you debate other subjects, this is one that you're not doing very well with. You come off as a person who is so filled with preconceived ideas about people in general that there is no room for learning about them, understanding them or accepting them. In short, you present as a highly prejudiced individual.
That's very limiting.
Although I have only been here a short time, I find that I am in total agreement with you and your post.
What baseless nonsense jennifer. That's one of the reasons I've long disliked you -- for years now. I have had many a disagreement with even what are otherwise my lefty allies, and sometimes quite heated ones, but I still "like" them, because they have something you lack -- integrity. As far as BL and the "new guy" are concerned, I'd suggest they simply try me on for size sometime. I have a tendency to ignore conspiracy kooks like BL, but don't know enough about the "new guy" to have an opinion. If anyone is being presumptuous, I'd say it is them.Micah, some people don't like anyone who disagrees with them about politics (or anything else, probably). Mytzlplk is one of them.
What baseless nonsense jennifer. That's one of the reasons I've long disliked you -- for years now. I have had many a disagreement with even what are otherwise my lefty allies, and sometimes quite heated ones, but I still "like" them, because they have something you lack -- integrity. As far as BL and the "new guy" are concerned, I'd suggest they simply try me on for size sometime. I have a tendency to ignore conspiracy kooks like BL, but don't know enough about the "new guy" to have an opinion. If anyone is being presumptuous, I'd say it is them.