The law specifically states that the intent to influence the election is a predicate for prosecution. So far no evidence of that. Do you have any info on someone being prosecuted....ever?
Title 18, U.S. code 597
- Thread starter PhilFish
- Start date
Well, they're either is evidence or there is not. The initial claim was that the Georgia law prohibits the provision of water. I exercise and pasted the specific passage that indicates that it's not prohibited generally, but is in fact prohibited specifically within a certain distance and by members of political parties.
Others claim that this prevents people from voting. Since we're in a thread whose title references Federal code within which there are explicit references prohibiting the provision of water, I asked for example since the claim was made. Should be a relatively low bar considering the claims made...
Not in the federal law, but it is in the Georgia law.
Why doesn't your artwork include Fox News? Can you go to Fox and get time to present your opinions on the air? If not they are censoring you....right?
No. I made no such claim. So far the only claim made is that this change in law will disenfranchise voters and cause them to leave the polls. Must be predicated on something correct? or is it simply being pulled out of thin air for sake of political fodder?
Mr. Friscus
Governor
Holy crap, the leftists on here are being shown direct proof and yet continue to recite made up claims. Nobody is being denied the ability to have water, and nobody is being denied voting. Facts.
EatTheRich
President
Just as poll workers were free to waive the requirement to recite the entire Constitution exactly without a mistake, and generally did in the case of white voters.
EatTheRich
President
Such is the obvious intent. The federal law cited does not prohibit the supply of water as humanitarian relief, only bribes intended to change votes. The Georgia law does prohibit the supply of water as humanitarian relief.
direct proof of what?
Spectacular silliness thank you for sharing
Yes that is the topic under discussion the supply of water as relief versus bribes intended to change votes. the Georgia law does not prohibit the supply of water as relief as cited above. Good luck
EatTheRich
President
Yes, it does, except by poll workers who as previously discussed will work with the Jim Crowing legislature to suppress the urban, minority, and student votes as has historically been the case.
Where does it mention political parties?
I'm sure that's it
Mr. Friscus
Governor
Can anyone show where voting is actually being suppressed? Is anyone being denied the right to vote?
Why is it so difficult to understand that this is an ongoing process...part of which was to limit polling places in democratic areas...how else do you end up with a five hour wait?
Do you really think people didn't give up and leave? On a hot and muggy day standing on a sidewalk, if you had no water for hours, would you leave?
I live in an upper middle class area and never waited for longer than 15 minutes to vote.
"hot and muggy" in Georgia in November, take a drink & food if needed
if they can't go a few hours w/out water, good thing they don't enlist!
Delaware has much stricter voting laws than Georgia
Georgia Governor Puts Biden In His Place Over New Election Law, ‘His Own Laws In His Own State Are More… | News Thud
State of Delaware - Department of Elections - Election law
"upper middle class" Joe's going to ensure you live in a poor area
You focused on the water proviso, yet it's obvious to all that you support this new Georgia voting bill which allows them to actually change the results of the election......as Trump wanted them to do for him. Now they can do it in upcoming elections.
what did I say about the new Georgia voting bill which allows them to actually change the results of the election?
If you could post my explicit statements please....
Temp was about 70 and humidity was 74%....Why would you think you'd be stuck for 5 hours in line?
Joe Biden isn't the guy who put election laws in place in Delaware.
Alinvegas
FJB
Come on man. Confusing us with fact again...Title 18, U.S. code 597
18 U.S. Code § 597 - Expenditures to influence voting
www.law.cornell.edu
Existing federal law that makes it a crime to attempt to influence the vote with food or beverage. Much like the law just passed in georgia. Seems to me a codifying of an existing federal law at the state level nothing more.
