I'm not defending rioters...you are.Tell the to the Government bldgs in Portland.
I'm not defending rioters...you are.Tell the to the Government bldgs in Portland.
does it help you to call others liars when you cannot actually prove a lie?You lefties on the board run around with this "prove" word that does you more harm than good.
prove he lied.You only survive on lies.
Which one?Prove my post is a lie, then.
It's not even in this thread... ha ha. Desperate are you?
You mean "barge in" like this?You don't have a "civil right" to barge into any official place of government business.
1. Yes, they forced their way in. They broke down police barriers and used those barriers as weapons. They broke windows and doors. They attacked police officers with weapons. Over 100 policemen had to have medical care.
One had a heart attack after being tazed a number of times.
2. They smeared feces on the walls.
3. They stole items from congressional offices.
4. They roamed the halls calling for Mike Pence to be hanged.
5. They came equipped with zip tie handcuffs. Was that so they could restrain members of congress and force them to listen?
They had the chance to have their voices heard. It was called an election. Their guy lost and lost in a landslide. The evidence that Trump and his team offered of a stolen election has been trashed. Judges in over 60 lawsuits decided there was no verifiable proof of his allegations. None. Even judges he appointed couldn't go along.
unreal...what do you think you've proven? I don't know who the guy in the video you say is an FBI agent is. Do you?You mean "barge in" like this?
Jack Posobiec on Twitter: "Is this officer waving the people inside? https://t.co/20MX0uR0fC" / Twitter
And who is this guy:
Thomas Massie on Twitter: "I just played this video for AG Merrick Garland. He refused to comment on how many agents or assets of the federal government were present in the crowd on Jan 5th and 6th and how many entered the Capitol. https://t.co/lvd9n4mMHK" / Twitter
Why isn't he in custody? Because he was working for the FBI? MMMMmmmmm, could be...
Putting him on ignore is very effective if you want to avoid his unhinged antics.You mean "barge in" like this?
Jack Posobiec on Twitter: "Is this officer waving the people inside? https://t.co/20MX0uR0fC" / Twitter
And who is this guy:
Thomas Massie on Twitter: "I just played this video for AG Merrick Garland. He refused to comment on how many agents or assets of the federal government were present in the crowd on Jan 5th and 6th and how many entered the Capitol. https://t.co/lvd9n4mMHK" / Twitter
Why isn't he in custody? Because he was working for the FBI? MMMMmmmmm, could be...
That is Flat out fabrication. They were a violent mob. They broke in and destroyed...visited violence on othersThey were denied entry when others have been let in. They broke in and once inside did little violence. Had they been allowed inside after going through security likely nothing would have happened.
ha ha.That is Flat out fabrication. They were a violent mob. They broke in and destroyed...visited violence on others
Sure looks like it to me. As for the guy - HE'S an "insurrectionist" - why isn't he in custody? For the same reason the FBI operatives who were leaders in the Whitmer "kidnapping" aren't? Probably, almost certainly.unreal...what do you think you've proven? I don't know who the guy in the video you say is an FBI agent is. Do you?
The other video you think shows police waiving people in?
Whatever that guy was the vast number of people there were peaceful protestors. Some lead a violent break-in to their own capitol and demanded answers for a stolen election. If they had been let in peacefully the evidence suggests there would have been no violence. What violence there was outside and inside may well have been instigated in whole or in part by government operatives as you say. I'm inclined to believe that at least some of it was.Sure looks like it to me. As for the guy - HE'S an "insurrectionist" - why isn't he in custody? For the same reason the FBI operatives who were leaders in the Whitmer "kidnapping" aren't? Probably, almost certainly.
That would have been nice if they had been lined up like ordinary visitors to the Capitol. Which they were not. Again you're peddling complete bullshit.ha ha.
They were violent breaking into their capitol. A capitol that should have been opened and allowed them in after going through a security check. Entry and exit counts would have allowed the capitol police to the control the number inside at any given point in time. Once inside it was clear the protestors were peaceful. They had no fire, spray paint, guns, nor other BLM/Antifa tactic on hand. They actually showed reverence for the place for the most part. Nothing would have happened inside if they had been treated like citizens of the U.S.
You must have missed the video. Nobody was talking about guns.
I didn't say anything about overthrowing the government. You're waffling all over the place.@PhilFish
If anyone of the protestors had waved a gun in the air brandishing it about, we would have seen it on security camera or smartphone clips. How do you carry out an insurrection meant to overthrow the government without a single gun?
The Sixers were patriots trying to stop a stolen election from being validated. What else would you expect after the Supreme Court abrogated its duty and refused to hear the case of a number of states brought against Pennsylvania regarding the election?
No they'll wear masks in future because they're big fat pussies just like the masked antifa people, who countenanced in their planning that going around destroying things is okay. It's not. Eventually decent people will beat those [Unwelcome language removed] thugs back into the darkYou know what else is true @PhilFish ? This time and all prior times the patriots, very much unlike Antifa/BLM, did not wear masks (note that long before Covid Antifa wore their masks). I think that from here on out masks will be worn even by patriots because of the vitriol, hate, and severe political consequences incurred by the truth and honesty required to be bare faced.
I hope for their sakes the patriots don't remain naive in this day and age and face their advesaries equally masked. They are not liked as you've made clear. I think its because you focus on those who are easy to despise and overlook the large number of decent people involved.