Colorforms
Senator
I just showed you he did. You obviously don't care about facts, so this discussion is going no where.
Republicans vote for a cover up on all documents and witnesses.
- Thread starter Spamature
- Start date
Colorforms
Senator
*sigh* hard to make someone think when they really don't want to. Oh well.
m i t h @ManlnTheHoody
trump could shoot someone in the senate and still get acquitted 53-47. unless he shot a republican, then it would be 52-47.
https://twitter.com/intent/like?tweet_id=1220190924291969024
10:46 PM - Jan 22, 2020
Good one, eh?
trump could shoot someone in the senate and still get acquitted 53-47. unless he shot a republican, then it would be 52-47.
https://twitter.com/intent/like?tweet_id=1220190924291969024
10:46 PM - Jan 22, 2020
Good one, eh?
Nutty Cortez
Dummy (D) NY
Actually. A Bernie Supporter tried that. Sick Leftists.
https://www.cnn.com/2017/06/14/homepage2/james-hodgkinson-profile/index.html
Nutty Cortez
Dummy (D) NY
*sigh* hard to make someone think when they really don't want to. Oh well.
2+2 Goes over his head. So discussing political issues with a leftist is wayyyyy over their head.
Spamature
President
No the article claims that he has it. He never formally invoked it with the House in the impeachment process.
And as that posted court decision shows. It has already been ruled invalid in unanimous vote by the SCOTUS.
Bugsy McGurk
President
Here’s the liar’s link to an opinion piece supposedly proving Trump has claimed executive privilege as to the impeachment inquiry...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-trump-administration-is-exercising-executive-privilege-without-saying-so/2018/09/04/4301954e-b05b-11e8-9a6a-565d92a3585d_story.html
It’s a September 2018 piece, written well over a year before ago, having nothing to do with the impeachment inquiry. It concerned the Kavanaugh nomination, and had nothing to do with executive privilege in any event.
And wingers wonder they are called the deplorables.
;-)
Spamature
President
Colorforms
Senator
In doing what he did, executive privilege has been invoked. I don't think he needs your permission.
Spamature
President
No, that is just obstruction of congress. He doesn't get anyone's permission to do that.In doing what he did, executive privilege has been invoked. I don't think he needs your permission.
Well maybe the Republican senate, or it looks like he will get a cover up out for it at least
Colorforms
Senator
So Schiff brainwashed you with his googly eyes as well. It's his super power, getting fascists to say stupid things
Spamature
President
So now it has come to this ? Once you guys excuses have been dealt with and exhausted you try to blame Trump being a criminal on anyone else except him. How could you not see that a man would a long history of questionable and illegal acts would continue those questionable and illegal acts if you made him the most powerful man in the world.So Schiff brainwashed you with his googly eyes as well. It's his super power, getting fascists to say stupid things
And now you're set to make him a King who can not be reigned in by the law.
We are all going to regret what you folks did to this nation.
But at least those of us who warned you, and spoke out against it, will have a clean conscience.
You won't.
Colorforms
Senator
LOL The house used partisan parliamentary tricks to push an impeachment that has no crime, and then you claim that if the Senate doesn't rule the way that the house wants, it's a cover up?
Trump could be a drug dealer and still not be nearly as corrupt as the current fascist left.
Spamature
President
Let me repeat:
If you obstructed congress it is a crime. In fact it is a federal crime. It is not my opinion it is the law.
18 U.S. Code § 1505. Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1505
Abusing his power would also include the laws he broke in furtherance of his attempt to cheat in the election. Which both the IG for intelligence and the GOA outlined when he violated the Impoundment and Control Act and covering up the whistleblower complaint. Remember his breaking the law by withholding the whistle blower complaint is how the country even found out about any of this in the first place.
Colorforms
Senator
The court hasn't ruled if the president obstructed or not. The fascist dems didn't wait for a verdict.
Nutty Cortez
Dummy (D) NY
The court hasn't ruled if the president obstructed or not. The fascist dems didn't wait for a verdict.
Hell, they couldn't wait to hear from witnesses.
Spamature
President
The courts ruled on that almost 50 yrs ago in regards to that in impeachment proceedings against Nixon.The court hasn't ruled if the president obstructed or not. The fascist dems didn't wait for a verdict.
Colorforms
Senator
There's still a debate as to whether or not this is a legal impeachment hearing, since there was never a vote to proceed with hearings in the house to begin with. That being said, there is no compulsion outside of the courts for the president to turn over anything demanded by the house. It's been that way since Washington.
Spamature
President
The House has SOLE POWER in regards to impeachment, not the courts, so says the highest law in the land, the Constitution.
It was a settled matter BEFORE Washington was even POTUS.
Spamature
President
See post 179The court hasn't ruled if the president obstructed or not. The fascist dems didn't wait for a verdict.
